| Literature DB >> 31763416 |
Talaat A Ahmed1, Ahmed Abou Elezz1, Noura H Al-Sayed2.
Abstract
In agricultural fields that are surrounded by dunes, the Casuarina tree is usually used as windbreaks. In addition, it plays a significant role in inhibiting nearby vegetation growth. In this dataset, the effect of Casuarina equisetifolia-L leaf aquatic extract on seed germination and growth of four selected plant crops (Maize, Lentil, Mustard, and Wheat) was tested. Seed germination test and a greenhouse experiment were conducted to study the effects of Casuarina equisetifolia aquatic leaf extract on seed germination and seedling growth. Various concentrations of leaf extract were used (0, 1.25%, 2.5%, and 5%). Results revealed that aqueous leaf extract of Casuarina equisetifolia-L affected significantly seed germination of all selected plant crops under laboratory conditions. Both wheat and maize have a comparable reduction in root length at 2.47 cm and 2.45 cm, respectively, but show a remarkable difference in percentage at 92% and 54% respectively under the effect of 5% aqueous solution. Similarly, lentil shows the highest drop in shoot length (SL) of 69% while no significant reduction observed in Mustard (SL) at the same aqueous solution concentration (5%). In the greenhouse experiment, dried leaf powder was mixed with soil in different concentrations (0, 15, 30, and 45 g kg-1 soil). Greenhouse experiments demonstrated that C. equisetifolia exhibited significant inhibition on wheat germination and seedling characteristics under all treatments. However, soil pH and electrical conductivity (EC) were examined and showed a relative reduction in pH and marked an increase in (EC).Entities:
Keywords: Casuarina equisetifolia-L; Greenhouse; Inhibition; Plant crops; Seed germination; Seedling growth
Year: 2019 PMID: 31763416 PMCID: PMC6864344 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104770
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Means of seed germination percentage, shoot length, root length (cm), and standard deviation as influenced by different concentrations of Casuarina leaf extracts of Mustard and Maize.
| Treatment | Mustard | Maize | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GP | ±SD | RL | ±SD | SL | ±SD | GP | ±SD | RL | ±SD | SL | ±SD | |
| Control | 95 | 14.8 | 3.51 | 1.11 | 2.03 | 0.34 | 72.5 | 5 | 4.51 | 1.84 | 1.65 | 0.46 |
| 1.25% | 85 | 14.8 | 3.21 | 0.57 | 2.32 | 0.8 | 52.5 | 12.5 | 5.03 | 0.94 | 2.26 | 0.32 |
| 2.50% | 90 | 8.6 | 2.66 | 0.82 | 2.54 | 0.47 | 60 | 8.16 | 3.52 | 0.5 | 1.82 | 0.36 |
| 5% | 66.67 | 12.2 | 1.56 | 0.71 | 1.97 | 0.77 | 37 | 5 | 2.06 | 0.25 | 1.43 | 0.13 |
Germination percentage (GP), Standard Deviation (SD), root length (RL), shoot length (SL).
Means of seed germination percentage, shoot/root length (cm), and standard deviation as influenced by different concentrations of Casuarina leaf extracts of lentil and Wheat.
| Treatment | lentil | Wheat | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GP | ±SD | RL | ±SD | SL | ±SD | GP | ±SD | RL | ±SD | SL | ±SD | |
| Control | 100 | 0 | 2.21 | 0.52 | 1.91 | 0.15 | 95.00 | 4.08 | 2.68 | 0.8 | 2.29 | 0.13 |
| 1.25% | 92.5 | 9.57 | 1.57 | 0.37 | 1.05 | 0.24 | 87.50 | 6.45 | 2.11 | 0.57 | 2.15 | 0.24 |
| 2.50% | 95 | 5.77 | 1.15 | 0.22 | 0.76 | 0.14 | 78.75 | 2.50 | 0.25 | 0.16 | 1.62 | 0.12 |
| 5% | 80 | 8.16 | 0.66 | 0.03 | 0.59 | 0.13 | 67.50 | 2.89 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 1.26 | 0.33 |
Germination percentage (GP), Standard Deviation (SD), root length (RL), shoot length (SL).
Analysis of variance of seed germination percentage as influenced by different concentrations of Casuarina leaf extracts of Mustard, Maize, Lentil, and Wheat.
| Source of Variation | DF | MS | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mustard | Maize | Lentil | Wheat | ||||||||||
| GP | SL | RL | GP | SL | RL | GP | SL | RL | GP | SL | RL | ||
| Between | 3 | 611.2 | 0.28 | 2.95 | 856.25 | 0.49 | 6.84 | 289.58 | 1.36 | 1.72 | 559.90 | 0.90 | 0.35 |
| Within | 12 | 164.8 | 0.34 | 0.57 | 68.75 | 0.11 | 1.14 | 47.92 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 18.23 | 0.04 | 0.24 |
| Total | 15 | ||||||||||||
Indicates significant differences among means at 0.05. MS; Means of squares. Germination percentage % (GP%), shoot length (SL), root length (RL).
Fig. 1The mean measurement data of germination percentage (GP), Root, and Shoot lengths (cm) for four crops under controlled lab conditions. (A)Mean germination %, (B)Mean root length, (C)Mean shoot length.
Means of germination percentage, plant characteristics, and their standard deviations of wheat as influenced by different concentrations of Casuarina dried leaf powder.
| Treatment | GP | ±SD | SL | ±SD | RL | ±SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 97.50 | 0.50 | 5.28 | 0.33 | 5.36 | 0.52 |
| 15 g/kg | 87.50 | 1.50 | 5.16 | 0.12 | 3.75 | 0.42 |
| 30 g/kg | 60.00 | 1.15 | 4.42 | 0.19 | 3.50 | 0.44 |
| 45 g/kg | 40.00 | 2.50 | 4.22 | 0.21 | 3.37 | 0.53 |
Means of germination percentage, plant characteristics, and their standard deviations of Mustard as influenced by different concentrations of Casuarina dried leaf powder.
| Treatment | GP | ±SD | SL | ±SD | RL | ±SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 60.00 | 4.08 | 9.60 | 4.22 | 4.08 | 0.74 |
| 15 g/kg | 68.30 | 2.06 | 3.75 | 0.65 | 3.37 | 0.62 |
| 30 g/kg | 58.33 | 6.13 | 3.79 | 0.57 | 3.33 | 0.98 |
| 45 g/kg | 95.00 | 1.50 | 5.75 | 1.30 | 2.37 | 1.41 |
Fig. 2Mean of Wheat, and Mustard germination percentage (GP) in a greenhouse under different Treatments.
Analysis of variance of seed germination percentage, shoot, and root length of wheat and Mustard as influenced by different concentrations of Casuarina leaf extracts of Wheat plant in the greenhouse.
| ANOVA | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | ANOVA | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wheat (GP) | Between Groups | 3 | 2741.6 | .000 | Mustard (GP) | Between Groups | 3 | 1151.22 | .000 | ||
| Within Groups | 12 | 2.55 | Within Groups | 12 | 15.16 | ||||||
| Total | 15 | Total | 15 | ||||||||
| Wheat (SL) | Between Groups | 3 | 1.12 | .000 | Mustard (SL) | Between Groups | 3 | 30.22 | 0.009 | ||
| Within Groups | 12 | 0.046 | Within Groups | 12 | 4.98 | ||||||
| Total | 15 | Total | 15 | ||||||||
| Wheat (RL) | Between Groups | 3 | 3.41 | .000 | Mustard (RL) | Between Groups | 3 | 1.971 | 2.015 | 0.166 | |
| Within Groups | 12 | 0.23 | Within Groups | 12 | 0.979 | ||||||
| Total | 15 | Total | 15 | ||||||||
Indicates significant differences among means at 0.05. Germination percentage (GP), shoot length (SL), root length (RL).
Means of pH, the electrical conductivity of soil, and their standard deviations as influenced by different concentrations of Casuarina leaf extracts of wheat and Mustard experiment in a greenhouse.
| Treatment | pH | ±SD | EC | ±SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 8.50 | 0.20 | 659.5 | 108.20 |
| 15 g/kg | 8.40 | 0.42 | 709.5 | 26.60 |
| 30 g/kg | 7.71 | 0.20 | 1054 | 156.25 |
| 45 g/kg | 7.81 | 0.30 | 1154 | 233.39 |
Fig. 3A-line chart of pH and EC under the effect of four different treatments.
Analysis of variance of pH and electrical conductivity of soil as influenced by different concentrations of Casuarina leaf extracts of Wheat and Mustard experiment in a greenhouse.
| ANOVA | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | Between Groups | 3 | .648 | .005 | |
| Within Groups | 12 | .091 | |||
| Total | 15 | ||||
| EC | Between Groups | 3 | 242973.67 | .001 | |
| Within Groups | 12 | 22784.62 | |||
| Total | 15 | ||||
Indicates significant differences among means at 0.05. The potential of Hydrogen (pH) and Electrical conductivity (EC).
Fig. 4Collection of Casuarina equisetifolia-L. leaves.
Preparation of the different concentrations.
| Volume taken (ml) | Volume up to (ml) | Final concentration (DF%) |
|---|---|---|
| 12.5 | 1000 | 1.25 |
| 25 | 1000 | 2.5 |
| 50 | 1000 | 5 |
Fig. 5Three different extract concentrations 1.25%, 2.50%, and 5% obtained from the stock solution of C. equisetifolia Leaves.
Fig. 6Germination test on Maize seeds by different extract concentrations.
Fig. 7Effect of incorporation of C. equisetifolia leaf powder on Wheat and Mustard (weed) germination and growth.
Specifications Table
| Subject | Agricultural, chemical science |
| Specific subject area | Allelopathic effect of |
| Type of data | Table, figure, chart |
| How data were acquired | Different leaf aquatic extract concentrations and leaf powder were used to study the effect of |
| Data format | Raw, analyzed |
| Parameters for data collection | Seed germination percentage (GP), root and shoot length of selected plant crops were investigated in the lab greenhouse under different concentrations of |
| Description of data collection | A four plant crops (Maize, lentil, Mustard, and Wheat) were tested for germination with different concentrations (0, 1.25%, 2.5%, and 5%) of leaf extract and (0, 15, 30 and 45 g kg−1) of well-dried leaf powder in the greenhouse were mixed with soil to study the seedlings inhibition effect during the study period. |
| Data source location | Institution: Environmental Science Center (ESC) and Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences (DBES), Qatar University |
| Data accessibility | The raw data was archived in Mendeley Data |
Understanding the allelopathic effects of The present dataset could be useful for concerned researchers and those who interested in cultivation, from the potential effects of crops surrounded by Furthermore, the dataset introduced in this article can be used to investigate the possible effect of the chemicals released from |