Literature DB >> 31763294

Study the Role of Nasal Scrap Cytology in Allergic Rhinitis Patients in Rural Population.

Puneet Singhvi1, Nitish Baisakhiya2, Gurchand Singh2.   

Abstract

Allergic Rhinitis is one of the gift of modern era. Condition is involving wide range of age group starting from children to old age people. In spite of latest diagnostic facility and advanced treatment, it is still a great challenge for the otorhinolaryngologist. This study was done to perform simple and cost effective test to understand the severity of Allergic Rhinitis. To investigate the patients of allergic rhinitis with specific focus on nasal scrape cytology. After applying inclusion and exclusion criterion were found suitable and hence selected for the present study. 100 patients who were clinically diagnosed on history and examination as allergic rhinitis were included as cases while control group consisted of 100 subjects having no symptoms of allergic rhinitis. These patients were a subjected to nasal scrape cytology for which Cytobrush Plus (Medscand Cell Sampling Kit), Malmo, Sweden, was employed. Mucosal specimens were acquired by scraping the surfaces of the middle thirds of inferior turbinates with Cytobrush Plus (Medscand Cell Sampling Kit), Malmo, Sweden. The samples thus obtained were transferred onto glass slides to be fixed in 95% ethyl alcohol and stained with May Gurwald Gimesa stain to study pattern and profile of different types of cells like eosinophils, goblet cells, mast cells. The nasal eosinophils were studied under 1000 × magnification of light microscope 10-well spread, high power epithelium fields were examined and the quantitative score of nasal eosinophils was rated according to a scale described by Meltzer. In study group all 100 patients underwent nasal scrape cytology. 25 (25%) patients in study group showed grade 1 + nasal eosinophilia followed by grade ½ + in 24 (24%), grade 0 in 22 (22%) and grade 2 + in 21 (21%). In control group 80% of subjects had grade 0 nasal eosinophilia. Difference between nasal eosinophilia in the study and the control group were found to be statistically significant. In study group 54% showed grading > 0.5 + whereas 46% showed ≤ 0.5 + . The sensitivity and specificity were observed to be 54% and 100% respectively. The results thus found were statistically significant. Nasal scrape cytology which was an added dimension proved to be a more specific than sensitive test. The specificity of nasal scrape cytology in our study was 100%. Sensitivity was only 54%. 22% of the patients of allergic rhinitis showed an eosinophil count more than 300/cu mm. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allergic rhinitis; Eosinophils; Nasal scraping

Year:  2018        PMID: 31763294      PMCID: PMC6848469          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-018-1468-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  13 in total

1.  Clinico-pathological correlation between allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma.

Authors:  B T Varghese; P S Murthy; R Rajan
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.469

2.  Intranasal corticosteroids versus oral H1 receptor antagonists in allergic rhinitis: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  J M Weiner; M J Abramson; R M Puy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-12-12

Review 3.  Epidemiology of allergy.

Authors:  Charles S Ebert; Harold C Pillsbury
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 4.  Evaluating rhinitis: clinical, rhinomanometric, and cytologic assessments.

Authors:  E O Meltzer
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  Descriptive study of 226 patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma in karaj city.

Authors:  Abolhassan Farhoudi; Alireza Razavi; Zahra Chavoshzadeh; Marzyeh Heidarzadeh; Mohammad Hassan Bemanian; Mohammad Nabavi
Journal:  Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.464

Review 6.  Allergy for the otologist. External canal to inner ear.

Authors:  M J Derebery; K I Berliner
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  The relationship between allergy and rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Virat Kirtsreesakul; Suwalee Ruttanaphol
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 8.  Pediatric otolaryngic allergy.

Authors:  B L Renfro
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Nasal eosinophilia in allergic and nonallergic rhinitis: usefulness of the nasal smear in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  D M Lans; N Alfano; R Rocklin
Journal:  Allergy Proc       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug

10.  Nasal eosinophilic inflammation contributes to bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  An-Soo Jang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  1 in total

1.  Efficacy of Biologics on Refractory Eosinophilic Otitis Media Associated with Bronchial Asthma or Severe Uncontrolled CRSwNP.

Authors:  Eugenio De Corso; Claudio Montuori; Stefano Settimi; Dario Antonio Mele; Alessandro Cantiani; Marco Corbò; Elena Cantone; Gaetano Paludetti; Jacopo Galli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.