Literature DB >> 31763256

Identification of Nasal Irrigation Bottle Contamination in Post Sinonasal Surgery.

Farah Dayana Zahedi1, Najihah Hanim Asmi2, Salina Husain1, Balwant Singh Gendeh3.   

Abstract

Nasal irrigation is an effective and cheap method in managing post sinonasal surgery patients. It works by improving ciliary clearance and performing mechanical debridement of the thick crust, decreasing mucosal edema and reducing the inflammatory mediators. Presence of nasal irrigation bottle contamination and its effect on patients have been studied. The aim of this study is to prospectively identify the risk of contamination in the nasal irrigation bottle, fluid from the bottle and to correlate with endoscopic findings from the patients who had underwent sinonasal surgery. Swabs will be taken from the nasal irrigation bottle and patient's middle meatus before the surgery and at each post surgery visits (2 and 4 weeks). Patients will be advised to irrigate their nose three times per day post sinonasal surgery. During endoscopic examination of the patient's nasal cavity at 2 and 4 weeks, any evidence of infection will be noted and documented. Additionally, a swab of fluid irrigated from the nasal cavity collected during the clinic follow-ups will also be taken. The specimens will be sent to the Microbiology laboratory for standard culture and sensitivity test. A total of 27 patients completed the study and were divided into case (n = 15) and control (n = 12) groups. The CFU (colony-forming unit) value of the bacteria cultured from the nasal cavity and the nasal irrigation bottle was statistically significantly (P = 0.00) increased from the baseline to the second week follow-up in both groups but not from the second week to the fourth week follow-up. The majority of the swabs from the nasal cavity of the patients and the nasal irrigation bottles were positively cultured for Pseudomonas sp. group. Other groups of bacteria that were cultured were Enterobacter sp., Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CONS) and Klebsiella sp. Endoscopically, there was no clinical evidence of infection found in the nasal cavity of the patients. The nasal irrigation bottle that was used in the post sinonasal surgery treatment and for alleviation of symptoms of sinonasal diseases was found to have bacterial contamination from the swabs taken from the bottle. However, despite this finding there was not clinical evidence of infection noted from the nasal endoscopic examination. A simple and effective method of cleaning the bottle would be helpful to reduce the bacterial contamination for this useful treatment method. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contamination; Nasal irrigation; Paranasal sinus; Transnasal endoscopic surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 31763256      PMCID: PMC6848311          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-017-1219-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  9 in total

Review 1.  Early postoperative care following endoscopic sinus surgery: an evidence-based review with recommendations.

Authors:  Luke Rudmik; Zachary M Soler; Richard R Orlandi; Michael G Stewart; Neil Bhattacharyya; David W Kennedy; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.858

2.  Assessing the risk of irrigation bottle and fluid contamination after endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  John M Lee; Jayakar V Nayak; Laurie L Doghramji; Kevin C Welch; Alexander G Chiu
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.467

3.  Identification of bacterial contaminants in sinus irrigation bottles from chronic rhinosinusitis patients.

Authors:  Shawn Lewenza; Laetitia Charron-Mazenod; John J W Cho; Brad Mechor
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-08

4.  Can bottle design prevent bacterial contamination of nasal irrigation devices?

Authors:  Andrew Foreman; Peter-John Wormald
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.858

5.  Nasal irrigation for the alleviation of sinonasal symptoms.

Authors:  D G Heatley; K E McConnell; T L Kille; G E Leverson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  The clinical significance of nasal irrigation bottle contamination.

Authors:  Mark Keen; Andrew Foreman; Peter-John Wormald
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 7.  Saline nasal irrigation: Its role as an adjunct treatment.

Authors:  Blake Papsin; Alison McTavish
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 8.  Saline nasal irrigation for upper respiratory conditions.

Authors:  David Rabago; Aleksandra Zgierska
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 3.292

9.  Clinical correlation between irrigation bottle contamination and clinical outcomes in post-functional endoscopic sinus surgery patients.

Authors:  Kevin C Welch; Michael B Cohen; Laurie L Doghramji; Noam A Cohen; Rakesh K Chandra; James N Palmer; Alexander G Chiu
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.467

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.