| Literature DB >> 31763180 |
Ramit Sharma1, Saloni Rahi1, Sidharth Mehan1.
Abstract
Autism is the category used within the newest edition of the diagnostic and statistical manual of neurodevelopmental disorders. Autism is a spectrum of disorder where a variety of behavioural patterns observed in autistic patients, such as stereotypes and repetitive behavior, hyperexcitability, depression-like symptoms, and memory and cognitive dysfunctions. Neuropathological hallmarks that associated with autism are mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, Neuro-excitation, abnormal synapse formation, overexpression of glial cells in specific brain regions like cerebellum, cerebral cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus. ICV injection of propionic acid (PPA) (4 μl/0.26 M) mimics autistic-like behavioral and biochemical alterations in rats. Literature findings reveal that there is a link between autism neuronal mitochondrial coenzyme-Q10 (CoQ10) and ETC-complexes dysfunctions are the keys pathogenic events for autism. Therefore, in the current study, we explore the neuroprotective interventions of Solanesol (SNL) 40 and 60 mg/kg alone and in combination with standard drugs Aripiprazole (ARP) 5 mg/kg, Citalopram (CTP) 10 mg/kg, Memantine (MEM) 5 mg/kg and Donepezil (DNP) 3 mg/kg to overcome behavioral and biochemical alterations in PPA induced experimental model of Autism. Chronic treatment with SNL 60 mg/kg in combination with standard drug shows a marked improvement in locomotion, muscle coordination, long-term memory and the decrease in depressive behavior. While, chronic treatment of SNL alone and in combination with standard drug aripiprazole, citalopram, donepezil, and memantine shows the Neuroprotective potential by enhancing the cognitive deficits, biochemical alterations along with reducing the level of inflammatory mediators and oxidative stress.Entities:
Keywords: AChE, acetylcholinesterase acetylcholinesterase; ARP, Aripiprazole; ATP; Aripiprazole; Autism; BBB, blood-brain barrier; CNS, center nerves system; CTP, Citalopram; Citalopram; CoQ10, coenzyme-Q10; Coenzyme-Q10; DNP, Donepezil; Donepezil; ELT, escape latency; ETC, electron-transport chain; ICV, Intracerebroventricular; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MAPK3, mitogen-activated protein kinase 3; MDA, malondialdehyde; MEM, Memantine; Memantine; NO, nitric oxide; PPA, propionic acid; Propionic acid; SNL, Solanesol; SOD, superoxide dismutase; UBE3A, Ubiquitin-protein ligase E3A; i.p., Intraperitoneal route; mitochondrial dysfunction; p.o., Oral
Year: 2019 PMID: 31763180 PMCID: PMC6861559 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.10.019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Treatment Groups.
| S.no. | Group | Drug treatment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Sham Control | No treatment |
| 2. | Solanesol perse | 60 mg/kg ( |
| 3. | Propionic acid | 0.26 M/4 μl/unilateral (ICV) from day 1 to 11 |
| 4. | Propionic acid + | 0.26 M/4 μl/unilateral (ICV) from day 1 to 11 + 40 mg/kg ( |
| 5. | Propionic acid + Solanesol | 0.26 M/4 μl/unilateral (ICV) from day 1 to 11 + 60 mg/kg ( |
| 6. | Propionic acid + Solanesol + Aripiprazole | 0.26 M/4 μl/unilateral (ICV) from day 1 to 11 + 40 mg/kg ( |
| 7. | Propionic acid + Solanesol | 0.26 M/4 μl/unilateral (ICV) from day 1 to 11 + 40 mg/kg ( |
| 8. | Propionic acid + Solanesol + Citalopram | 0.26 M/4 μl/unilateral (ICV) from day 1 to 11 + 40 mg/kg ( |
| 9. | Propionic acid + Solanesol | 0.26 M/4 μl/unilateral (ICV) from day 1 to 11 + 40 mg/kg ( |
Fig. 1Experimental protocol schedule (Behavioral & Biochemical estimations).
Fig. 2Neuroprotective effect of SNL on body weight in ICV-PPA treated autistic rats.
Values expressed as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.001 versus sham control and SNL60 perse; # p < 0.001versus PPA; #@ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL40; $ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL60; $β p < 0.001 versus CTP10, DNP3, MEM5 (two way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test)
Fig. 3Neuroprotective effect of SNL in spatial memory using Morris water maze task in ICV- PPA treated autistic rat.
Values expressed as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.001 versus sham control and SNL60 perse; # p < 0.001versus PPA; #@ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL40; $ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL60; $β p < 0.001 versus MEM5, ARP5, CTP10 (two way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test)
Fig. 4Neuroprotective effect of SNL in TSTQ using morris water maze task in ICV-PPA treated autistic rat.
Values expressed as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.001 versus sham control and SNL60 perse; # p < 0.001versus PPA; #@ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL40; $ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL60; $β p < 0.001 versus MEM5, ARP5, CTP10 (two way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test)
Fig. 5Neuroprotective Effect of SNL on locomotion activity using actophotometer in ICV-PPA induced autistic rat.
Values expressed as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.001 versus sham control and SNL60 perse; # p < 0.001versus PPA; #@ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL40; $ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL60; $β p < 0.001 versus ARP5, DNP3, CTP10 (two way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test).
Fig. 6Neuroprotective Effect of SNL on muscle coordination using a beam crossing task in ICV-PPA treated autistic rats.
Values expressed as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.001 versus sham control and SNL60 perse; # p < 0.001versus PPA; #@ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL40; $ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL60; $β p < 0.001 versus ARP5, MEM5, DNP3 (two way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test)
Fig. 7Neuroprotective Effect of SNL on immobility phase using Forced swim test in ICV-PPA treated autistic rats.
Values expressed as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.001 versus sham control and SNL60 perse; # p < 0.001versus PPA; #@ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL40; $ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL60; $β p < 0.001 versus DNP3, CTP10, ARP5 (two way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test).
Neuroprotective effect of SNL in mitochondrial ETC complexes enzyme level in ICV-PPA treated autistic rats.
| Grouping | Mitochondrial complexes enzyme level | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complex-I | Complex -II | Complex -V | CoQ10 | |
| Sham control | 11.85 ± 0.61 | 8.46 ± 0.25 | 588.0 ± 2.08 | 7.28 ± 0.06 |
| SNL | 11.25 ± 0.40 | 8.38 ± 0.23 | 588.0 ± 2.44 | 7.38 ± 0.15 |
| PPA 4 μl/0.26 M | 2.76 ± 0.36* | 1.52 ± 0.0* | 130.3 ± 16.97* | 0.83 ± 0.09* |
| PPA + SNL40 | 3.58 ± 0.37# | 1.73 ± 0.07# | 250.3 ± 2.51# | 1.91 ± 0.23# |
| PPA + SNL60 | 4.35 ± 0.42#@ | 2.11 ± 0.18#@ | 329.7 ± 4.90#@ | 2.51 ± 0.15#@ |
| PPA + SNL60+ CTP10 | 5.53 ± 0.22$ | 3.45 ± 0.11$ | 406.7 ± 8.49 $ | 3.90 ± 0.24$ |
| PPA + SNL60+MEM5 | 6.03 ± 0.30$ | 4.04 ± 0.12$ | 448.3 ± 11.21 $ | 4.48 ± 0.13$ |
| PPA + SNL60+ | 8.83 ± 0.41$ | 5.43 ± 0.23$ | 495.8 ± 4.43 $ | 5.55 ± 0.13$ |
| PPA + SNL60+ | 10.07 ± 0.14 $β | 7.29 ± 0.23 $β | 539.7 ± 7.28 $β | 6.33 ± 0.08 $β |
Values expressed as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.001 versus sham control and SNL60 perse; # p < 0.001versus PPA; #@ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL40; $ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL60; $β p < 0.001 versus DNP3, MEM5, CTP10 (one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test).
Neuroprotective Effect of SNL on neurotransmitters level (serotonin, Dopamine, Glutamate, acetylcholine) estimations in PPA treated rats.
| Neurotransmitter levels | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grouping | 5-HT | Grouping | Glutamate | Grouping | Dopamine | Grouping | Ach |
| Sham control | 32.00 ± 0.85 | Sham control | 98.17 ± 0.79 | Sham control | 82.00 ± 0.57 | Sham control | 5.44 ± 0.04 |
| SNL | 31.33 ± 0.66 | SNL | 96.33 ± 0.49 | SNL | 80.50 ± 0.76 | SNL | 5.24 ± 0.02 |
| PPA 4 μl/0.26 M | 7.83 ± 0.30* | PPA 4 μl/0.26 M | 273.30 ± 0.91* | PPA 4 μl/0.26 M | 24.17 ± 0.60* | PPA 4 μl/0.26 M | 0.32 ± 0.01* |
| PPA + SNL40 | 10.83 ± 0.30# | PPA + SNL40 | 196.20 ± 2.35# | PPA + SNL40 | 39.50 ± 0.99# | PPA + SNL40 | 0.69 ± 0.04# |
| PPA + SNL60 | 13.67 ± 0.21#@ | PPA + SNL60 | 167.00 ± 0.73#@ | PPA + SNL60 | 43.67 ± 1.05#@ | PPA + SNL60 | 0.94 ± 0.01#@ |
| PPA + SNL60 | 20.00 ± 0.44 $ | PPA + SNL | 147.20 ± 1.10 $ | PPA + SNL60 | 58.50 ± 0.42 $ | PPA + SNL + CTP10 | 1.93 ± 0.01$ |
| PPA + SNL60 | 23.50 ± 0.42 $ | PPA + SNL60+ DNP3 | 127.00 ± 1.23 $ | PPA + SNL60 | 62.17 ± 0.70 $ | PPA + SNL60 | 2.82 ± 0.04$ |
| PPA + SNL60+ ARP5 | 27.33 ± 0.33 $ | PPA + SNL60+ ARP5 | 115.70 ± 2.66 $ | PPA + SL60 | 66.00 ± 0.57 $ | PPA + SNL60 | 3.70 ± 0.09$ |
| PPA + SNL60 | 31.00 ± 0.57 $β | PPA + SNL60 | 105.50 ± 1.45 $β | PPA + SNL60 | 73.83 ± 0.94 $β | PPA + SNL60 | 4.08 ± 0.02 $β |
Values expressed as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.001 versus normal control and SNL60 perse;#p < 0.001 versus PPA; #@ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL40; $ p < 0.05 versus PPA + SNL60; $β p < 0.001 versus ARP5, MEM5, DNP3 (one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test).
Values expressed as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.001 versus normal control and SNL60 perse;#p < 0.001 versus PPA; #@ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL40; $ p < 0.05 versus PPA + SNL60; $β p < 0.001 versus ARP5, DNP3, CTP10 (one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test).
Values expressed as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.001 versus normal control and SNL60 perse;#p < 0.001 versus PPA; #@ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL40; $ p < 0.05 versus PPA + SNL60; $β p < 0.001 versus MEM5, ARP5, CTP10 (one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test).
Values were expressed as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.001 versus normal control and SNL60 perse;#p < 0.001 versus PPA; #@ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL40; $ p < 0.05 versus PPA + SNL60; $β p < 0.001 versus MEM5, ARP5, CTP10 (one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test).
Neuroprotective Effect of SNL on pro-inflammatory cytokines in ICV-PPA treated autistic rats.
| Grouping | Neuro-inflammatory markers | |
|---|---|---|
| TNF-α | IL-1β | |
| Sham control | 23.83 ± 0.79 | 7.50 ± 0.42 |
| SNL | 23.50 ± 0.76 | 7.33 ± 0.49 |
| PPA 4 μl/0.26 M | 61.33 ± 0.76* | 17.17 ± 0.79* |
| PPA + SNL40 | 55.67 ± 1.02# | 15.83 ± 0.30# |
| PPA + SNL60 | 43.00 ± 0.85#@ | 15.50 ± 0.22#@- * |
| PPA + SNL + CTP10 | 54.00 ± 0.93 $ | 14.17 ± 0.40 $ |
| PPA + SL60+MEM5 | 52.83 ± 1.07 $ | 13.83 ± 0.30 $ |
| PPA + SNL60+DNP3 | 43.50 ± 1.25 $ | 12.83 ± 0.47 $ |
| PPA + SNL60+ARP5 | 35.00 ± 1.31 $β | 10.50 ± 0.42 $β |
Values were expressed as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.001 versus normal control and SNL60 perse;#p < 0.001 versus PPA; #@ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL40; $ p < 0.05 versus PPA + SNL60; $β p < 0.001 versus DNP3, MEM5, CTP10 (One way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test).
Neuroprotective effect of SNL on oxidative stress markers (AchE, GSH, LDH, MDA, nirite and SOD) in ICV-PPA treated autistic rats.
| Oxidative stress markers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | AchE | GSH | LDH | MDA | Nitrite | SOD |
| Sham control | 11.67 ± 0.17 | 24.78 ± 0.11 | 99.33 ± 0.33 | 23.83 ± 0.79 | 2.56 ± 0.07 | 448.3 ± 0.66 |
| SNL | 11.58 ± 0.20 | 25.±0.15 | 98.00 ± 0.36 | 23.50 ± 0.76 | 2.56 ± 0.42 | 447.2 ± 0.94 |
| PPA 4 μl/0.26 M | 43.83 ± 1.17* | 1.2 ± 0.01* | 372.80 ± 0.87* | 61.33 ± 0.76* | 3.71 ± 0.01* | 305.7 ± 1.68* |
| PPA + SNL40 | 30.33 ± 0.21# | 2.65 ± 0.17# | 277.00 ± 0.57# | 55.17 ± 0.47# | 3.61 ± 0.01# | 318.3 ± 0.88# |
| PPA + SNL60 | 23.67 ± 0.21#@ | 3.73 ± 0.08#@ | 252.00 ± 0.85@ | 48.33 ± 0.88#@ | 3.52 ± 0.01#@ | 335.3 ± 0.80#@ |
| PPA + SNL60+ CTP10 | 21.67 ± 0.21 $ | 5.65 ± 0.07$ | 198.70 ± 0.49 $ | 39.50 ± 0.42 $ | 3.23 ± 0.01$ | 349.7 ± 0.66 $ |
| PPA + SNL60+ ARP5 | 19.50 ± 0.22 $ | 7.58 ± 0.09$ | 149.00 ± 0.51 $ | 36.17 ± 0.60 $ | 3.14 ± 0.01$ | 369.0 ± 0.73 $ |
| PPA + SL60+ MEM5 | 17.50 ± 0.22 $ | 9.45 ± 0.10$ | 121.30 ± 0.80 $ | 31.83 ± 0.60 $ | 3.05 ± 0.01$ | 388.5 ± 0.88 $ |
| PPA + SNL60+ DNP3 | 13.67 ± 0.14 $β | 10.83 ± 0.16 $β | 117.70 ± 1.47 $β | 28.67 ± 0.49 $β | 2.80 ± 0.01 $β | 417.7 ± 1.68 $β |
Values were expressed as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.001 versus normal control and SNL60 perse;#p < 0.001 versus PPA; #@ p < 0.001 versus PPA + SNL40; $ p < 0.05 versus PPA + SNL60; $β p < 0.001 versus MEM5, ARP5, CTP10. (One way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test).