CASE SERIES SUMMARY: Two adult cats were evaluated because of recurrent abscesses of the right lateral thoracoabdominal wall. The abscesses receded with antibiotics but relapsed shortly after therapy interruption. Ultrasonography identified fluid-filled lesions containing linear, hyperechoic material with distal acoustic shadowing in the sublumbar region of both cats. Ultrasound-guided retrieval of grass awns was performed in both cases, which resulted in complete clinical resolution. RELEVANCE AND NOVEL INFORMATION: While sublumbar abscesses in dogs are a relatively common disease, their occurrence in cats is much less common. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the ultrasonographic features of sublumbar abscessation induced by foreign bodies and their ultrasound-guided retrieval in cats.
CASE SERIES SUMMARY: Two adult cats were evaluated because of recurrent abscesses of the right lateral thoracoabdominal wall. The abscesses receded with antibiotics but relapsed shortly after therapy interruption. Ultrasonography identified fluid-filled lesions containing linear, hyperechoic material with distal acoustic shadowing in the sublumbar region of both cats. Ultrasound-guided retrieval of grass awns was performed in both cases, which resulted in complete clinical resolution. RELEVANCE AND NOVEL INFORMATION: While sublumbar abscesses in dogs are a relatively common disease, their occurrence in cats is much less common. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the ultrasonographic features of sublumbar abscessation induced by foreign bodies and their ultrasound-guided retrieval in cats.
While sublumbar abscesses in dogs (often resulting from bite wounds or grass awn
migration) are a relatively common disease, their occurrence in cats is much less
common.[1-5] In cats, grass awns have been
found in the ocular region, in the thoracic cavity (lungs, caudal mediastinum,
heart), cervical spine and abdominal cavity (urinary bladder, common bile duct and
peripancreatic region).[1,3,4,6-13] CT features of a sublumbar
abscess secondary to a grass seed lodged in the sublumbar muscles have been
described in one cat that underwent surgical treatment.[1] To our knowledge, the ultrasonographic features of sublumbar abscessation
induced by migrating foreign bodies and their ultrasound-guided retrieval have not
been reported in cats.The aim of this paper is to present the clinical and ultrasonographic findings
observed in two cats affected by a grass awn-induced sublumbar abscess extending
into the lateral thoracoabdominal wall; both cats underwent successful
ultrasound-guided retrieval of the foreign bodies.
Case series description
Case 1
A 7-year-old neutered female, indoor–outdoor Maine Coon cat was referred in
January for an abscess of the right lateral thoracoabdominal wall, noted for the
first time by the owner 2 months earlier. It had recurred several times in the
previous 2 months, despite surgical curettage and multiple courses of
antibiotics. Coughing, sneezing or general prostration had not been reported by
the owner. At presentation, the cat was pyrexic and a painful space-occupying
lesion, with a length of about 15 cm and a height of 7 cm, and with multiple
draining tracts could be appreciated in the dorsal portion of the right lateral
thoracoabdominal wall. A complete blood cell count showed severe leukocytosis
with band and toxic neutrophils; routine serum biochemistry and urinalysis were
within normal limits.Ultrasonographic examination was performed with a 12 MHz linear transducer (Aplio
400; Toshiba). Within the abdominal wall, a large subcutaneous multi-cavitary
lesion with several draining tracts was visible. One of the draining tracts
could be followed to the right retroperitoneal space at the mid-lumbar level. A
poorly defined, hypoechoic, irregularly marginated, cavitary lesion consistent
with a right retroperitoneal abscess was detected in the right sublumbar region
and located in the right ileopsoas muscles, which did not show normal
echotexture.A 2.4 mm long linear spindle-shaped shadow, with two hyperechoic parallel
interfaces causing a dense acoustic shadow was imaged within this lesion, on the
right ventrolateral aspect of the mid-lumbar spine, dorsolateral to the caudal
vena cava (Figure
1).
Figure 1
Case 1: view of the transverse process V sublumbar vertebra (arrow)
showing a large sublumbar cavitary lesion containing a linear
hyperecohoic spindle-shaped structure with some distal shadowing
consistent with a migrating foreign body (arrowhead)
Case 1: view of the transverse process V sublumbar vertebra (arrow)
showing a large sublumbar cavitary lesion containing a linear
hyperecohoic spindle-shaped structure with some distal shadowing
consistent with a migrating foreign body (arrowhead)Once the foreign body was deemed reachable with a non-surgical approach, the cat
was sedated with methadone (0.2 mg/kg IV; Dechra). General anaesthesia was
induced with propofol (3 mg/kg IV; Merial) and was maintained with isoflurane
inhalant 1–2% (Virbac). After surgical preparation of the right lateral
thoracoabdominal wall, Hartmann Alligator forceps were introduced in one of the
previously detected fistulous tracts (with the aim of aligning it with the
connecting tract between the parietal and the sublumbar abscesses and the
foreign body), and directed towards the retroperitoneal foreign body, under
ultrasonographic guidance. The forceps were opened and the foreign body grasped
and successfully removed (Figure 2). Cytological analysis was not performed; antibiotic
therapy with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (16 mg/kg PO q12h [Pfizer]) was
prescribed for 2 weeks. Postoperatively, pain was controlled with methadone
(0.2 mg/kg IM q4–6h [Novartis]). Two months later, the cat was clinically
normal.
Figure 2
Case 1: oblique view of the sublumbar region during ultrasound-guided
foreign body (arrowhead) retrieval with Hartmann Alligator forceps
(arrow)
Case 1: oblique view of the sublumbar region during ultrasound-guided
foreign body (arrowhead) retrieval with Hartmann Alligator forceps
(arrow)
Case 2
A 5-year-old castrated male, mostly outdoor domestic shorthair cat was referred
for a large, recurring, right lumbar abscess, first noted 5 months earlier, in
August. The cat had been previously treated with several courses of antibiotics:
enrofloxacin (5 mg/kg PO q24h [Bayer]) for 21 days and then
amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (16 mg/kg PO q12h [Pfizer]) twice for 14 and 21
days, respectively. Despite initial therapeutic success, recurrence occurred
each time after cessation of antibiotic therapy. At presentation, the cat was
quite alert and responsive, although the owner reported prostration of the cat
in the past few days.Upon clinical examination, a large warm mass with no draining tract was detected
at the right caudal abdominal wall. Blood testing was declined by the cat’s
owner. Ultrasound examination of the lesion was performed using an L8-18i linear
probe (Logiq E R6; General Electric). Ultrasonographically, a large,
well-defined cavitary lesion containing echogenic heterogeneous fluid was
detected in the subcutaneous region. A thin fistulous tract connected this
lesion with another large cavitary lesion located in the right caudal sublumbar
region; two hyperechoic structures with linear interfaces and acoustic shadowing
were imaged inside the sublumbar region. The cat was sedated with butorphanol
(0.2 mg/kg IV; Zoetis) and anaesthetised with propofol (3 mg/kg IV; Merial).
After intubation, general anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane inhalant
1–2% (Virbac). After surgical preparation of the right abdominal wall, a small
stab incision was performed in the skin overlying the subcutaneous abscess in
order to align it with the fistulous tract and the sublumbar foreign bodies
using ultrasound guidance again. Hartmann Alligator forceps were then inserted
into the incision and the two fragments grasped and retrieved in two separate
attempts (Figure 3). The
shape of the retrieved foreign bodies was compared with the ultrasonographic
images. Subsequently, approximately 25 ml of purulent material was suctioned
from the sublumbar abscess and 60 ml from the subcutaneous lesion under
ultrasonographic guidance. The latter abscess was flushed with saline and a
Penrose drain applied in the subcutaneous abscess via the stab incision.
Figure 3
Two grass awn fragments retrieved in case 2
Two grass awn fragments retrieved in case 2Postoperatively, pain was controlled with robenacoxib (1 mg/kg PO [Novartis]).
Sensitivity testing of collected pus was declined by the cat’s owner and broad
spectrum antibiotic therapy with enrofloxacin (5 mg/kg PO q24h [Bayer]) was
prescribed for 4 weeks. Recovery was uneventful: 36 months after the procedure,
the patient was free of clinical signs and did not show any recurrence.
Discussion
Migration of vegetal foreign bodies poses a clinical challenge for the veterinarian
and the clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic features have been evaluated in several
studies, primarily involving canine patients.[1] Because most affected dogs show aspecific clinical signs, grass awn migration
should be always considered as a differential diagnosis in patients living in areas
where the disease is present.[1,2,4-7,14-22]Both cases presented in this report showed thoraco-abdominal wall abscesses as the
presenting complaint, but no previous clinical signs reported by the owners were
suggestive of sublumbar grass awn migration as the inciting cause.In our cases, the entry route of the foreign bodies could not be determined with
absolute certainty but, as it occurs in dogs with the same location of plant
material, inhalation was suspected as the entry route.[5,14,17,19] Although respiratory clinical
signs, such as coughing and sneezing, were not noted by owners in neither of the
cases in the present report, Leal et al reported that 9/12 cats with
tracheobronchial foreign bodies were asymptomatic.[8]Ultrasonography proved to be the diagnostic modality of choice for the evaluation of
patients with thoraco-abdominal wall abscesses because it allows identification of
foreign material that, because of its peculiar morphology, in most instances can be
recognised as a grass awn seed. Grass awns can be differentiated from wooden foreign
bodies because of their linear spindle shape and multiple parallel, hyperechoic
linear interfaces.[2,5,7,14,17,20,21,23] Distal acoustic shadowing is a
constant ultrasonographic feature of wooden foreign bodies, but it is not always
present in plant awns (depending on their composition/thickness and on the angle of
insonation); it is most likely to be seen in transverse views rather than in
longitudinal views.[24]Once diagnosis was established, ultrasonography proved to be useful in therapeutic
planning by allowing assessment of the feasibility of non-surgical retrieval. If a
draining tract is present, it can be used to insert the forceps into the abscess.
Given proper alignment, it can be obtained with the connecting fistulous tracts
between the parietal and sublumbar abscesses and the foreign body (if alignment
cannot be obtained, a new stab skin incision needs to be performed). Once inserted
into the parietal abscess, the Hartmann Alligator forceps are directed under
real-time ultrasound guidance through the draining tract to reach the sublumbar
abscess and then the foreign body.[23] Special care must be taken to avoid large vessels, such as the aorta or the
caudal vena cava, during both insertion of the forceps and grasping.Furthermore, ultrasonography allows for a non-invasive overhaul of the whole
infection site in search of multiple foreign bodies/fragments. Special attention
needs to be paid to the retrieval procedure in order not to overlook smaller
fragments that can lead to recurrence. Entrance of air and the flow of purulent
material out of the lesion with secondary image quality degradation might be causes
of procedure failure.An alternative diagnostic imaging tool is CT, which usually allows adequate
identification of the secondary lesions and draining tracts connecting them, but
correct identification and localisation of the foreign body is uncommon.[1,6] Both Schultz and Zwingenberger[6] and Vansteenkiste et al[1] described the CT findings observed in dogs and cats with migrating grass
awns; grass seeds were identified only in 4/14 and 6/32 patients, respectively, and
only when located in the bronchi. This is probably due to the lower inherent
contrast between the vegetal foreign material and the content of the abscess.
Furthermore, CT does not allow real-time guidance of the surgeon, which is an
inherent advantage of ultrasonography. Consequently, CT is considered a second line
diagnostic tool in patients with a suspected plant awn-induced abscess.[1,6]
Conclusions
Most subcutaneous abscesses in cats are secondary to bite wounds and are treated
accordingly with antibiotics, or are eventually associated with surgical debridement
in selected cases without any need for diagnostic imaging to be performed. This
aetiology was also suspected in the cases presented in this report, but other
possible causes had to be considered because of multiple episodes of recurrence. In
both cases, ultrasonography showed high diagnostic accuracy by allowing for accurate
assessment of the parietal lesions, depiction of the fistulous tracts connecting
them with the sublumbar portion of the abscesses, and correct recognition and
localization of the foreign bodies. Furthermore, the foreign bodies were safely
retrieved under ultrasonographic guidance in a minimally invasive fashion without
the need of a standard surgical celiotomy. This approach, as previously reported in
dogs, allowed for a reduction in the duration of anaesthesia, reduced costs and
allowed a faster recovery than the standard surgical procedure.[23,25]