| Literature DB >> 31762993 |
Xiao-Qing Zhang1, Chang Yao1, Wei-He Bian1, Xu Chen1, Jing-Xian Xue1, Zhi-Yuan Zhu1, Yu Ying1, Yan Lei Xu1, Cong Wang1.
Abstract
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has from ancient times been applied in China for the treatment of breast cancer with its own unique theoretical system. Sanhuang decoction composed of astragalus membranaceus, prepared rhubarb, and rhizoma curcumae longae has traditionally been used for antioxidant stress, inflammatory reaction, and angiogenesis. However, the role and mechanism of Sanhuang decoction in breast cancer remains unknown. The present study demonstrated the antitumor activity of Sanhuang decoction against breast cancer xenografts in nude mice. Notably, Sanhuang decoction promoted severe necrosis and induced cell death. In addition, Sanhuang decoction obviously regulated the inflammation and oxidative stress. Despite these, Sanhuang decoction could increase the expression of Nrf2. Moreover, si-Nrf2 exhibited the opposite effects compared with the Sanhuang decoction treatment group and reversed the antibreast cancer role of Sanhuang decoction. Further, Sanhuang decoction remarkably suppressed the expression of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Taken together, Sanhuang decoction was firstly evaluated to possess potent antibreast cancer effect in vivo through regulation of inflammation and oxidative stress accomplished by up-regulation of Nrf2 via PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway and Sanhuang decoction might be a powerful candidate formula for antibreast cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Nrf2; PI3K/AKT/mTOR; Sanhuang decoction; breast cancer
Year: 2019 PMID: 31762993 PMCID: PMC6848822 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1154
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1The tumor volume, weight, pathology, and cell apoptosis in vivo. NC: planting by normal MCF‐7 cell; si‐Nrf2: planting by MCF‐7 which was transfected with si‐Nrf2; si‐Nrf2 + Sanhuang: planting by MCF‐7 which was transfected with si‐Nrf2 and fed by Sanhuang decoction (4 g/kg); Sanhuang: planting by normal MCF‐7 cell and fed by Sanhuang decoction (4 g/kg). (a) The tumor of difference groups in body. (b) The tumor tissues taken out and tumor volume and weight. *: p <.05 versus NC; ##: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2; $: p < .05 versus si‐Nrf2 + Sanhuang. (c) The tumor pathology of difference groups by H&E staining (400×). (d) The positive apoptosis cell of difference groups by TUNEL assay (400×). *: p < .05 versus NC; ##: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2; $: p < .05 versus si‐Nrf2 + Sanhuang
Figure 2The TNF‐α and IL‐6 concentrations of difference groups by ELISA. *: p < .05 versus NC; ##: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2; $: p < .05 versus si‐Nrf2 + Sanhuang
Figure 3Antioxidant enzymes activities and ROS production. (a) The antioxidant enzyme activities of difference groups. *: p < .05 versus NC; ##: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2; $: p < .05 versus si‐Nrf2 + Sanhuang. (b) The ROS production of difference groups. *: p < .05 versus NC; ##:p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2; $: p < .05 versus si‐Nrf2 + Sanhuang
Figure 4The mRNA and protein expressions of VEGF, MMP‐2, and MMP‐9. (a). The VEGF, MMP‐2, and MMP‐9 genes expressions of difference groups by RT‐PCR. ***: p < .001 versus NC; ##: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2; $$: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2 + Sanhuang. (b) The VEGF protein expression of difference groups by IHC (400×). ***: p < .001 versus NC; ##: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2; $$: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2 + Sanhuang. (c) The MMP‐2 protein expression of difference groups by IHC (400×). ***: p < .001 versus NC; ##: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2; $$: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2 + Sanhuang. (d) The MMP‐9 protein expression of difference groups by IHC (400×). ***: p < .001 versus NC; ##: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2; $$: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2 + Sanhuang
Figure 5The mRNA and protein expressions of PI3K, AKT, and mTOR. (a) The PI3K, AKT, and mTOR gene expressions of difference groups by RT‐PCR. ***: p < .001 versus NC; ##: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2; $$: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2 + Sanhuang. (b) The PI3K protein expression of difference groups by IHC (400×). ***: p < .001 versus NC; ##: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2; $$: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2 + Sanhuang. (c) The AKT protein expression of difference groups by IHC (400×). ***: p < .001 versus NC; ##: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2; $$: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2 + Sanhuang. (d) The mTOR protein expression of difference groups by IHC (400×). ***: p < .001 versus NC; ##: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2; $$: p < .01 versus si‐Nrf2 + Sanhuang