Literature DB >> 31762935

Linking miR-138 and USP10-P53 signaling.

Ri Cui.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  P53; USP10; miR-138; mutation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31762935      PMCID: PMC6859924          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


× No keyword cloud information.
A negative feedback regulatory loop between miR-138 and TP53 is mediated by USP10 by Luo et al. Oncotarget. 2019; 10:6288–6296. P53 is one of the best known tumor suppressors and is known as the “guardian of the genome”. Since discovery of P53, its function has been extensively studied and P53 network keeps growing in complexity. P53 is a transcription factor, regulates and associates with a number of genes to exert central role in genomic maintenance and tumor inhibition [1, 2]. In the normal condition, the expression level of P53 in the cells is relatively low, owing to E3 ubiquitin ligase Mdm2 mediated ubiquitin-proteasome degradation pathway. Mdm2 and other P53 ubiquitination associated proteins were phosphorylated by ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated) result in degradation through inhibiting their interaction with USP7 (ubiquitin specific peptidase 7) / HAUSP (herpesvirus-associated ubiquitin-specific protease), thereby stabilizing P53 when cells under stress [3, 4]. In addition, USP10 directly deubiquitinates P53 subsequently increasing P53 expression levels [5]. TP53 gene is most frequently mutated gene in human cancers, as in about 50% of human cancers have TP53 deletion or mutation. Mutation of TP53 gene and the resultant inactivation of P53 allow evasion of tumor cell death and rapid tumor progression. Accumulating evidence indicates that mutant P53 is abundantly expressed in the certain type of human cancers and contributes to tumor progression and resistance to anticancer therapy [6]. Importantly, USP10 could involve deubiquitination of both wild-type and mutant P53 thus was considered as either tumor suppressor or oncogene [5]. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small endogenous non-coding RNAs with 19–25 nucleotides long. In general, microRNAs bind to the 3’-untranslated regions (3’-UTR) of mRNA in a sequence specific manner inducing mRNA degradation or repressing mRNA translation. miRNAs have tissue specific expression pattern, function as tumor suppressor or oncogene depend on tumor tissue type [7]. In 2002, Dr. Croce’s lab revealed for the first time that the potential importance of miRNAs in the diagnosis, prognosis and progression of a malignancy. They found that deletion of two miRNAs, miR-15a and miR-16-1 at chromosome 13q14 region, lead to development of indolent form of CLL (chronic lymphocytic leukemia) [8, 9]. In this context, Luo et al. found that USP10 is a direct target of miR-138. miR-138 overexpression inhibited both USP10 mRNA and protein expression levels. Since USP10 deubiquitinates and stabilizes P53, they further examined the effects of miR-138 on the expression level of P53 and observed that consistent down-regulation of P53 mRNA and protein levels after overexpressing miR-138. miR-138 overexpression also inhibited P53 dependent transcriptional activity by repressing USP10 and attenuated P53 dependent cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. By using Chip assay and Luciferase reporter assay, Luo et al. identified that P53 directly binds to the promoter region of miR-138 and negatively regulates miR-138 expression indicating that negative feedback regulatory loop between miR-138 and P53 [10]. P53 mutation status largely influences oncogenic or tumor suppressive functions of USP10 in cancer. Since miR-138 targets USP10, miR-138 could also work as either tumor suppressor or oncogene. In fact, miR-138 has been found to play a tumor suppressive role by targeting various oncogenes in non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer etc. In contrary, miR-138 plays oncogenic function by targeting tumor suppressor genes in glioblastoma [11]. These dual functions of miR-138 might be due to its different targets in different cancer tissue type. Another possibility is that miR-138 regulates either wild-type or mutated P53 by targeting USP10 as reported in this study. Further studies need to confirm that distinct role of miR-138 in tumorigenesis and P53 mutation status. Considering approximately half of human cancers with P53 mutation/deletion and regulatory axis of miR138 - USP10 - P53, miR-138 might be a promising therapeutic target upon identification of P53 mutation/deletion status.
  11 in total

1.  A dynamic role of HAUSP in the p53-Mdm2 pathway.

Authors:  Muyang Li; Christopher L Brooks; Ning Kon; Wei Gu
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Cancer. p53, guardian of the genome.

Authors:  D P Lane
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-07-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Pivotal role of microRNA-138 in human cancers.

Authors:  Margaret Yeh; Christina S Oh; Ji Young Yoo; Balveen Kaur; Tae Jin Lee
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Frequent deletions and down-regulation of micro- RNA genes miR15 and miR16 at 13q14 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  George Adrian Calin; Calin Dan Dumitru; Masayoshi Shimizu; Roberta Bichi; Simona Zupo; Evan Noch; Hansjuerg Aldler; Sashi Rattan; Michael Keating; Kanti Rai; Laura Rassenti; Thomas Kipps; Massimo Negrini; Florencia Bullrich; Carlo M Croce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Causes and consequences of microRNA dysregulation in cancer.

Authors:  Carlo M Croce
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  USP10 regulates p53 localization and stability by deubiquitinating p53.

Authors:  Jian Yuan; Kuntian Luo; Lizhi Zhang; John C Cheville; Zhenkun Lou
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  MicroRNA profiling reveals distinct signatures in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemias.

Authors:  George Adrian Calin; Chang-Gong Liu; Cinzia Sevignani; Manuela Ferracin; Nadia Felli; Calin Dan Dumitru; Masayoshi Shimizu; Amelia Cimmino; Simona Zupo; Mariella Dono; Marie L Dell'Aquila; Hansjuerg Alder; Laura Rassenti; Thomas J Kipps; Florencia Bullrich; Massimo Negrini; Carlo M Croce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  p53 mutations in cancer.

Authors:  Patricia A J Muller; Karen H Vousden
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  Molecular recognition of p53 and MDM2 by USP7/HAUSP.

Authors:  Yi Sheng; Vivian Saridakis; Feroz Sarkari; Shili Duan; Tianne Wu; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; Lori Frappier
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2006-02-12       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  A negative feedback regulatory loop between miR-138 and TP53 is mediated by USP10.

Authors:  Zhenghua Luo; Manchao Zhang; Ri Cui; Esmerina Tili; Taewan Kim; Tae Jin Lee; Yong Peng; Carlo Croce
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2019-10-29
View more
  1 in total

1.  Serum MicroRNA-137 Serves as a Novel Biomarker for Cerebral Atherosclerosis Diagnosis and Cerebrovascular Event Prediction.

Authors:  Jingjing Xuan; Meiling Shang; Xuelian Li
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.271

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.