| Literature DB >> 31762614 |
Asim Mehmood1, Umal Baneen1, Ahmad Zaheer2, Muhammad Wasim Sajid1, Abrar Hussain1, Shahzad Saleem1, Qudsia Yousafi1, Hamid Rashid1, Hassan Riaz1, Awais Ihsan1, Farrukh Jamil1, Yasar Sajjad3, Nageena Zahid4, Muhammad Shahzad Anjam4, Muhammad Arshad5, Zeenat Mirza6,7, Sajjad Karim8,7, Mahmood Rasool8,7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Phosphorous is an essential micronutrient of plants and involved in critical biological functions. In nature, phosphorous is mostly present in immobilized inorganic mineral and in the fixed organic form including phytic acid and phosphoesteric compounds. However, the bioavailability of bound phosphorous could be enhanced by the use of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi. The phytases are widespread in an environment and have been isolated from different sources comprising bacteria and fungi.Entities:
Keywords: EMS mutagenesis; Fungus; Gamma rays; Phosphate solubilizer
Year: 2019 PMID: 31762614 PMCID: PMC6864213 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.07.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1(A) Phytase producing fungal strains on phytase screening medium, (B) Strain ST2 of Sporotrichum thermophile forming halo zone on potato dextrose agar medium.
Effect of different carbon sources on phytase activity of strain ST2.
| Carbon Source | Enzyme Activity, U/mL (Days) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 1% glucose | 169 ± 0.87 | 286 ± 2.41 | 347 ± 1.63 | 302 ± 1.6 | 254 ± 1.43 |
| Sucrose | 198 ± 2.67 | 256 ± 1.34 | 312 ± 2.34 | 315 ± 2.78 | 269 ± 1.56 |
| Fructose | 205 ± 2.23 | 276 ± 2.89 | 326 ± 2.98 | 338 ± 1.67 | 246 ± 2.77 |
| Maltose | 212 ± 1.23 | 298 ± 1.54 | 345 ± 1.45 | 347 ± 1.79 | 259 ± 1.30 |
| Lactose | 236 ± 1.65 | 265 ± 2.32 | 329 ± 1.96 | 310 ± 2.67 | 279 ± 1.12 |
| Glucose + Sucrose | 256 ± 1.12 | 299 ± 1.10 | 334 ± 1.12 | 328 ± 1.74 | 312 ± 1.32 |
| Dextrose | 278 ± 1.21 | 311 ± 1.54 | 381 ± 1.12 | 320 ± 2.99 | 278 ± 1.23 |
| Glucose + Lactose | 289 ± 2.34 | 300 ± 1.23 | 339 ± 1.23 | 318 ± 1.33 | 301 ± 1.12 |
Optimization of pH for maximum enzyme activity of strain ST2.
| Days | pH (Enzyme activity U/mL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 8.5 | |
| 1 | 47 ± 1.33 | 76 ± 1.3 | 156 ± 1.34 | 86 ± 1.61 | 52 ± 1.53 | 39 ± 1.42 |
| 2 | 84 ± 2.53 | 113 ± 1.62 | 248 ± 2.22 | 139 ± 2.32 | 98 ± 1.32 | 72 ± 2.12 |
| 3 | 95 ± 1.90 | 156 ± 1.22 | 382 ± 1.53 | 169 ± 1.92 | 154 ± 2.78 | 90 ± 1.34 |
| 4 | 109 ± 2.39 | 179 ± 1.98 | 321 ± 1.52 | 179 ± 1.12 | 169 ± 2.34 | 189 ± 2.99 |
| 5 | 198 ± 1.03 | 201 ± 1.99 | 299 ± 1.53 | 199 ± 1.23 | 265 ± 1.99 | 299 ± 1.45 |
Screening of various nitrogen sources for maximum phytase activity of strain ST2.
| Days | Source of Nitrogen | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urea | NaNO3 | Yeast Extract | (NH4)2SO4 | CH3COONH4 | |
| 1 | 193 ± 1.72 | 64 ± 1.39 | 180 ± 1.72 | 187 ± 1.62 | 163 ± 1.23 |
| 2 | 201 ± 4.93 | 194 ± 2.34 | 185 ± 2.91 | 211 ± 1.90 | 198 ± 2.23 |
| 3 | 286 ± 8.23 | 265 ± 1.12 | 395 ± 2.54 | 301 ± 2.45 | 299 ± 2.12 |
| 4 | 235 ± 8.11 | 204 ± 2.18 | 302 ± 2.45 | 312 ± 1.76 | 275 ± 2.99 |
| 5 | 278 ± 6.27 | 322 ± 1.85 | 342 ± 2.43 | 289 ± 2.49 | 265 ± 2.23 |
Effect of temperature on enzyme activity of strain ST2.
| Temperature (°C) | Activity, U/mL |
|---|---|
| 20 | 79 ± 1.71 |
| 25 | 190 ± 1.67 |
| 35 | 223 ± 1.11 |
| 45 | 387 ± 1.12 |
| 55 | 321 ± 1.11 |
| 65 | 354 ± 1.43 |
Fig. 2Showing approximate number of colonies of Sporotrichum thermophile after different doses of gamma radiations in kilorads.
Number of colonies of Sporotrichum thermophile at different concentrations of gamma radiation doses.
| Gamma Radiation Kilorads | CFU/ml (colony forming units) | Log (CFU/ml) |
|---|---|---|
| 180 | 12 ± 1.12 | 4.079 |
| 160 | 28 ± 1.52 | 4.447 |
| 140 | 30 ± 2.93 | 4.612 |
| 120 | 35 ± 1.26 | 4.801 |
| 100 | 40 ± 1.62 | 4.902 |
| 80 | 43 ± 1.21 | 5.613 |
| 60 | 102 ± 1.80 | 7.008 |
| 40 | 122 ± 1.94 | 7.086 |
| 20 | 300 ± 2.63 | 7.577 |
Fig. 3Survival curve of colonies of Sporotrichum thermophile at different concentrations of gamma radiations.
Fig. 4Growth and clearance of all picked colonies.
Fig. 5Selected potential mutants of Sporotrichum thermophile for phytase production.
Comparison of phytase production between parent and mutant strains.
| Strain | Productivity folds | |
|---|---|---|
| (U/l/d) | Increase | |
| Parent | 6183 ± 2.83 | 1 |
| STM-1 | 14221 ± 2.21 | 2.3 |
| STM-2 | 16694 ± 2.15 | 2.7 |
| STM-3 | 13603 ± 2.41 | 2.2 |
| STM-4 | 14839 ± 2.25 | 2.4 |
| STM-5 | 15458 ± 2.43 | 2.5 |
| STM-6 | 17931 ± 2.71 | 2.9 |
Fig. 6Activity profile of mutant strain by gamma radiations under fermentation condition.
Number of colonies of Sporotrichum thermophile at different time intervals of EMS treatment.
| EMS Treatment (Min.) | CFU/ml | Log (CFU/ml) |
|---|---|---|
| 150 | 10 ± 1.61 | 3.901 |
| 120 | 11 ± 1.50 | 4.075 |
| 90 | 26 ± 1.15 | 4.345 |
| 60 | 28 ± 1.19 | 4.582 |
| 30 | 34 ± 1.44 | 4.801 |
Fig. 7Survival curve of colonies of Sporotrichum thermophile at time intervals of EMS treatment.
Comparison of phytase production between parent and EMS-generated mutant strains.
| Strain | Productivity folds | |
|---|---|---|
| (U/l/d) | Increase | |
| Parent | 6185 ± 2.43 | 1 |
| STM-1 | 15341 ± 2.57 | 2.5 |
| STM-2 | 18342 ± 2.19 | 2.9 |
| STM-3 | 15432 ± 2.78 | 2.5 |
| STM-4 | 16543 ± 2.67 | 2.6 |
| STM-5 | 17634 ± 2.64 | 2.8 |
| STM-6 | 19875 ± 2.55 | 3.2 |
Fig. 8Activity profile of EMS-mutant strains under fermentation conditions.