| Literature DB >> 31762608 |
Abstract
For the first time a finger print analysis via high-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) of Boswellia Sp. Burseraceae was accomplished. A preliminary investigation of the Boswellia Sp. Burseraceae displayed the presence of chemical constituents that could be involved in the production of innovative pharmaceuticals for an array of antiviral, anticancer, and antibacterial uses. Moreover, the finger print analysis would deem useful for establishing HPTLC standardization for natural and herbal photochemical constituents.Entities:
Keywords: Boswellia Sp. Burseraceae; HPTLC; Pharmaceuticals
Year: 2019 PMID: 31762608 PMCID: PMC6864145 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.09.019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Results for identification of phytochemical constituents by HPTLC Analysis of Aqueous Extract of Boswellia Sp. Burseraceae.
| S. No. | Name of the Test | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Trichloroacetic Acid Test | NEGATIVE |
| 2. | Xanthoprotein Test | NEGATIVE |
| 1. | Dragendroff’s Test | POSITIVE |
| 2. | Tannic acid Test | POSITIVE |
| 1. | Millons Test | NEGATIVE |
| 2. | Ninhydrin Test | NEGATIVE |
| 1. | Molisch’s Test | POSITIVE |
| 2. | Barfoed’s Test | POSITIVE |
| 3. | Seliwinoff’s test | POSITIVE |
| 4. | Test for Pentoses | NEGATIVE |
| 1. | Shinoda Test | NEGATIVE |
| 2. | Alkaline reagent Test | NEGATIVE |
| 3. | Zinc hydrochloride test | NEGATIVE |
| 1. | Ferric chloride test | NEGATIVE |
| 1. | Test for Gallotannins | NEGATIVE |
| 2. | Test for Ellagitannins | NEGATIVE |
| 1. | Libermann- Burchard Test | NEGATIVE |
| 2. | Salkowaski test | NEGATIVE |
| 3. | Sulfur powder test | NEGATIVE |
| 1. | Test A & B | NEGATIVE |
| 1. | Legal’s test | NEGATIVE |
| 2. | Baljet’s test | NEGATIVE |
| 1. | Froth formation Test | NEGATIVE |
| 1. | Borntrager’s test | NEGATIVE |
| 1. | Test For Saponins | POSITIVE |
| 1. | Test For Anthocyanins | NEGATIVE |
HPTLC profile of Boswellia Sp. Burseraceae aqueous extract in DMSO.
| Sr. No. | Track | Start Position | Start Height | Max Position | Max Height | End Position | End Height | Area | Area % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 0.07 Rf | 3.6 AU | 0.07 Rf | 133.8 AU | 0.09 Rf | 0.0 AU | 904.8 AU | 14.83 |
| 2 | 2 | 0.11 Rf | 0.3 AU | 0.13 Rf | 12.2 AU | 0.14 Rf | 6.5 AU | 165.3 AU | 02.71 |
| 3 | 2 | 0.14 Rf | 6.7 AU | 0.16 Rf | 24.8 AU | 0.18 Rf | 0.6 AU | 519.7 AU | 08.52 |
| 4 | 2 | 0.51 Rf | 0.3 AU | 0.54 Rf | 17.6 AU | 0.56 Rf | 0.2 AU | 383.2 AU | 6.28 |
| 5 | 2 | 0.58 Rf | 1.1 AU | 0.61 Rf | 50.3 AU | 0.65 Rf | 0.6 AU | 1329.3 AU | 21.79 |
| 6 | 2 | 0.68 Rf | 0.3 AU | 0.73 Rf | 15.4 AU | 0.76 Rf | 2.5 AU | 665.5 AU | 10.91 |
| 7 | 2 | 0.79 Rf | 0.2 AU | 0.83 Rf | 64.8 AU | 0.87 Rf | 2.8 AU | 2133.1 AU | 34.96 |
Fig. 12 D chromatogram of aqueous Boswellia Sp. Burseraceae extract.
Fig. 2Spectra of Peak observed at Rf Value 0.07.
Fig. 3Spectra of Peak observed at Rf Value 0.13.
Fig. 4Spectra of Peak observed at Rf Value 0.16.
Fig. 5Spectra of Peak observed at Rf Value 0.54.
Fig. 6Spectra of Peak observed at Rf Value 0.61.
Fig. 7Spectra of Peak observed at Rf Value 0.73.
Fig. 8Spectra of Peak observed at Rf Value 0.83.