Literature DB >> 31761407

Comprehensive hearing aid assessment in adults with bilateral severe-profound sensorineural hearing loss who present for Cochlear implant evaluation.

J Eric Lupo1, Allison Biever2, David C Kelsall2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To comprehensively assess and describe functional auditory performance in a group of adults with bilateral, moderate sloping to profound sensorineural hearing loss who were dissatisfied users of well-fit bilateral hearing aids and presented for Cochlear implant evaluation. Participants were evaluated with bilateral hearing aids and after six months of bimodal (Cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid) hearing experience with a Cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid.
METHODS: Study participants were assessed using pure tone audiometry, aided speech understanding in quiet (CNC words) and in noise (AzBio sentences at +10 and +5 dB SNR) in the sound field with unilateral and bilateral hearing aids fit to target. Participants completed subjective scales of quality of life, (Health Utilities Index Mark 3), hearing disability, (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale) and a device use satisfaction scale. Participants ≥55 years were administered the Montreal Cognitive Assessment screening tool. One-hundred enrolled individuals completed baseline evaluations.
RESULTS: Aided bilateral mean speech understanding scores were 28% for CNC words and 31%, and 17% for AzBio sentences at a +10 dB, and +5 dB SNR, respectively. Mean scale ratings were 0.46 for overall quality of life and 3.19 for functional hearing ability. Ninety percent of participants reported dissatisfaction with overall hearing performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation results, including functional performance metrics quantifying the deleterious effects of hearing loss for overall wellbeing, underscore that bilateral hearing aids are not an effective treatment for individuals with bilateral, moderate sloping to profound sensorineural hearing loss. Individuals with this degree of hearing impairment, who demonstrate poor aided speech understanding and dissatisfaction with hearing abilities in everyday life, require timely referral to a Cochlear implant clinic for further evaluation.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31761407     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.102300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0196-0709            Impact factor:   1.808


  2 in total

1.  External Validation of Cochlear Implant Screening Tools Demonstrates Modest Generalizability.

Authors:  David S Lee; Jacques A Herzog; Amit Walia; Jill B Firszt; Kevin Y Zhan; Nedim Durakovic; Cameron C Wick; Craig A Buchman; Matthew A Shew
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 2.619

2.  Development of a novel screening tool for predicting Cochlear implant candidacy.

Authors:  Stephany J Ngombu; Christin Ray; Kara Vasil; Aaron C Moberly; Varun V Varadarajan
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.