Literature DB >> 31761183

Comparison of 2D and 3D cell culture models for cell growth, gene expression and drug resistance.

Julia C Fontoura1, Christian Viezzer2, Fabiana G Dos Santos3, Rosane A Ligabue3, Ricardo Weinlich4, Renato D Puga4, Dyeison Antonow5, Patricia Severino4, Cristina Bonorino6.   

Abstract

In vitro drug screening is widely used in the development of new drugs, because they constitute a cost-effective approach to select compounds with more potential for therapy. They are also an attractive alternative to in vivo testing. However, most of these assays are done in two-dimensional culture models, where cells are grown on a polystyrene or glass flat surface. In order to develop in vitro models that would more closely resemble physiological conditions, three-dimensional models have been developed. Here, we introduce two novel fully synthetic scaffolds produced using the polymer polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB): a Solvent-Casting Particle-Leaching (SCPL) membrane; and an electrospun membrane, to be used for 3D cultures of B16 F10 murine melanoma cells and 4T1 murine breast cancer cells. A 2D cell culture system in regular tissue culture plates and a classical 3D model where cells are grown on a commercially available gel derived from Engelbreth-Holm Swarm (EHS) tumor were used for comparison with the synthetic scaffolds. Cells were also collected from in vivo tumors grown as grafts in syngeneic mice. Morphology, cell viability, response to chemotherapy and gene expression analysis were used to compare all systems. In the electrospun membrane model, cells were grown on nanometer-scale fibers and in the SCPL membrane, which provides a foam-like structure for cell growth, pore sizes varied. Cells grown on all 3D models were able to form aggregates and spheroids, allowing for increased cell-cell contact when compared with the 2D system. Cell morphology was also more similar between 3D systems and cells collected from the in vivo tumors. Cells grown in 3D models showed an increase in resistance to dacarbazine, and cisplatin. Gene expression analysis also revealed similarities among all 3D platforms. The similarities between the two synthetic systems to the classic EHS gel model highlight their potential application as cost effective substitutes in drug screening, in which fully synthetic models could represent a step towards higher reproducibility. We conclude PHB synthetic membranes offer a valuable alternative for 3D cultures.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31761183     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  28 in total

1.  Culture and in situ H2O2-mediated electrochemical study of cancer cells using three-dimensional scaffold based on graphene foam coated with Fe3O4 nanozyme.

Authors:  Xue-Bo Hu; Ning Shang; Xiao-Hui Chen; Zi-He Jin; Meng-Yuan He; Tian Gan; Yan-Ming Liu
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 2.  Dynamic Interactions between Tumor Cells and Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Erika Testa; Claudia Palazzo; Roberta Mastrantonio; Maria Teresa Viscomi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Mast Cells Tryptase Promotes Intestinal Fibrosis in Natural Decellularized Intestinal Scaffolds.

Authors:  Jian Wan; Tianqi Wu; Ying Liu; Muqing Yang; Jakub Fichna; Yibing Guo; Lu Yin; Chunqiu Chen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 4.451

4.  Reproducible In Vitro Tissue Culture Model to Study Basic Mechanisms of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: Comparative Analysis to Valvular Interstitials Cells.

Authors:  Andreas Weber; Melissa Pfaff; Friederike Schöttler; Vera Schmidt; Artur Lichtenberg; Payam Akhyari
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-04-26

5.  3D cell culture alters signal transduction and drug response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonas Heid; Annette Affolter; Yvonne Jakob; Johann Kern; Nicole Rotter; Esther Tenschert; Anne Lammert
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Gene Expression Signature of BRAF Inhibitor Resistant Melanoma Spheroids.

Authors:  Viktoria Koroknai; Vikas Patel; István Szász; Róza Ádány; Margit Balazs
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.201

7.  Development of pH-Responsive Polymer Coating as an Alternative to Enzyme-Based Stem Cell Dissociation for Cell Therapy.

Authors:  Yu-Jin Kim; Tae-Jin Lee; Gun-Jae Jeong; Jihun Song; Taekyung Yu; Doo Sung Lee; Suk Ho Bhang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Advances in Engineering Human Tissue Models.

Authors:  Chrysanthi-Maria Moysidou; Chiara Barberio; Róisín Meabh Owens
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-28

9.  Cytotoxicity of Seaweed Compounds, Alone or Combined to Reference Drugs, against Breast Cell Lines Cultured in 2D and 3D.

Authors:  Fernanda Malhão; Alice Abreu Ramos; Ana Catarina Macedo; Eduardo Rocha
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-01-31

Review 10.  Advances in 3D peptide hydrogel models in cancer research.

Authors:  Jingwen Xu; Guangyan Qi; Weiqun Wang; Xiuzhi Susan Sun
Journal:  NPJ Sci Food       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.