Xin Wang1,2, Zhiqi Mao2, Zhipei Ling2, Xinguang Yu3,4. 1. School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. 3. School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China. xinguang_yu301@126.com. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. xinguang_yu301@126.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique for Alzheimer's disease (AD). rTMS, with high- or low-frequency, is thought to enhance or inhibit the cortical activities, respectively. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to summarize the efficacy of the rTMS on the cognition of AD patients and to identify its potential influential factors. METHODS: Literature from the Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched and screened to identify eligible studies. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects of rTMS. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate the influential factors. RESULTS: Ten studies with 15 trials involving 240 patients were included. Compared with sham stimulation, rTMS could significantly improve cognition in AD (SMD, 0.42; 95% CI 0.18-0.67; P = 0.0006). Subgroup analysis suggested significant cognitive enhancement in participants receiving rTMS on multiple sites rather than on single site, and in patients receiving rTMS of more than 10 sessions, but not ≤ 10 sessions. Compared with rTMS as the single therapeutic method, rTMS with concurrent cognitive training seemed to produce greater improvement. Moreover, 20 Hz rTMS, seemed to be more effective than 10 Hz or 1 Hz rTMS. Furthermore, patients with higher education, or with mild-to-moderate AD were more likely to benefit from rTMS than patients with lower education, or with severe dementia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current evidence, rTMS was an effective therapy for cognitive impairment in AD. Large RCTs are warranted to further validate the results of our subgroup analyses.
BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique for Alzheimer's disease (AD). rTMS, with high- or low-frequency, is thought to enhance or inhibit the cortical activities, respectively. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to summarize the efficacy of the rTMS on the cognition of ADpatients and to identify its potential influential factors. METHODS: Literature from the Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched and screened to identify eligible studies. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects of rTMS. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate the influential factors. RESULTS: Ten studies with 15 trials involving 240 patients were included. Compared with sham stimulation, rTMS could significantly improve cognition in AD (SMD, 0.42; 95% CI 0.18-0.67; P = 0.0006). Subgroup analysis suggested significant cognitive enhancement in participants receiving rTMS on multiple sites rather than on single site, and in patients receiving rTMS of more than 10 sessions, but not ≤ 10 sessions. Compared with rTMS as the single therapeutic method, rTMS with concurrent cognitive training seemed to produce greater improvement. Moreover, 20 Hz rTMS, seemed to be more effective than 10 Hz or 1 Hz rTMS. Furthermore, patients with higher education, or with mild-to-moderate AD were more likely to benefit from rTMS than patients with lower education, or with severe dementia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current evidence, rTMS was an effective therapy for cognitive impairment in AD. Large RCTs are warranted to further validate the results of our subgroup analyses.
Authors: Arianna Menardi; Simone Rossi; Giacomo Koch; Harald Hampel; Andrea Vergallo; Michael A Nitsche; Yaakov Stern; Barbara Borroni; Stefano F Cappa; Maria Cotelli; Giulio Ruffini; Georges El-Fakhri; Paolo M Rossini; Brad Dickerson; Andrea Antal; Claudio Babiloni; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Bruno Dubois; Gustavo Deco; Ulf Ziemann; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Emiliano Santarnecchi Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 11.788
Authors: Shahid Bashir; Mohammad Uzair; Turki Abualait; Muhammad Arshad; Roaa A Khallaf; Asim Niaz; Ziyad Thani; Woo-Kyoung Yoo; Isaac Túnez; Asli Demirtas-Tatlidede; Sultan Ayoub Meo Journal: Mol Med Rep Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 2.952