Literature DB >> 31760309

Oral contraceptive and intrauterine device use and the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III or worse: a population-based study.

Diede L Loopik1, Joanna IntHout2, Willem J G Melchers3, Leon F A G Massuger4, Ruud L M Bekkers5, Albert G Siebers6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Hormonal contraceptive use has been associated with the development of cervical cancer, although inconsistent results are reported on the association with intrauterine device (IUD) use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the type of contraceptive use and the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III or worse (CIN3+).
METHODS: A retrospective population-based cohort study including women aged 29-44 years attending the cervical cancer screening program with normal cytology between 2005 and 2009 identified from the Dutch Pathology Registry. Subgroups with at least 5 years registered use of an oral contraceptive (OC) or IUD were compared with non-users. Risk ratios of CIN3+ were estimated per contraceptive type.
RESULTS: 702,037 women were included with a median follow-up of 9.7 years, of which 6705 (0.96%) and 559 (0.08%) women developed CIN3 and cervical cancer, respectively. IUD use was associated with an increased risk of developing CIN3+ (risk ratio (RR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32-1.74), and OC use was associated with an increased risk of developing CIN3+ (RR 2.77, 95%CI 2.65-3.00) and cervical cancer (RR 2.06, 95%CI 1.52-2.79). The risk of developing CIN3+ and cervical cancer was higher for OC users compared with IUD users (RR 1.83, 95%CI 1.60-2.09 and RR 1.70, 95%CI 1.00-2.90, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Both OC use and IUD use were associated with an increased risk of developing CIN3+. However, for women with a contraceptive wish, an IUD seems safer than an OC as the risk of developing CIN3+ and cervical cancer was higher for OC users.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Contraceptives; Follow-up studies; Intrauterine devices; Retrospective studies; Risk assessment; Uterine cervical neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31760309     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  3 in total

1.  Phototheranostics of Cervical Neoplasms with Chlorin e6 Photosensitizer.

Authors:  Aida Gilyadova; Anton Ishchenko; Artem Shiryaev; Polina Alekseeva; Kanamat Efendiev; Radmila Karpova; Maxim Loshchenov; Victor Loschenov; Igor Reshetov
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-02       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Genotype-specific Distribution and Change of High-risk Human Papillomavirus Infection and the Association with Cervical Progression Risk in Women with Normal Pathology and Abnormal Cytology in a Population-based Cohort Study in China.

Authors:  Haixia Jia; Ling Ding; Yang Han; Yuanjing Lyu; Min Hao; Zhiqiang Tian; Jintao Wang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  Increased Risk of High-grade Cervical Neoplasia in Women with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Case-controlled Cohort Study.

Authors:  R L Goetgebuer; J E Kreijne; C A Aitken; G Dijkstra; F Hoentjen; N K de Boer; B Oldenburg; A E van der Meulen; C I J Ponsioen; M J Pierik; F J van Kemenade; I M C M de Kok; A G Siebers; J Manniën; C J van der Woude; A C de Vries
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 9.071

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.