H Donkers1, R Bekkers2, L Massuger3, K Galaal4. 1. Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust, Truro, Cornwall, United Kingdom. 2. Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands. 3. Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 4. Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust, Truro, Cornwall, United Kingdom; University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom. Electronic address: k.galaal@nhs.net.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: METHODS: This is a retrospective study of surgically managed endometrial cancer patients in the Royal Cornwall Hospital Truro between January 2006 and August 2017. Patient characteristics, overall survival, recurrence free survival and intra- and postoperative outcomes were evaluated across socioeconomic deprivation groups in which socioeconomic deprivation was measured with the English Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). RESULTS: In total, we identified 831 women, of which 690 were included. The median age was 66 years with a median BMI of 31 and the majority of tumours were endometrioid tumours (80.1%). For type 1 (endometrioid) tumours, better survival was seen in the least deprived patients, however this was not significant in a multivariate analysis and only age, stage and BMI remained significant. For type 2 (all other) tumours, no association between survival and socioeconomic deprivation was found and only stage was significant. However, more affluent patients had significantly higher recurrence rates. In addition, we did not find evidence of an association between intra- or post-operative complication rates and socioeconomic deprivation. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with survival in endometrial cancer patients, however after adjusting for confounders this association does not remain. Only age, stage and BMI are independent prognostic factors for survival. In addition, there is no evidence of association between socioeconomic deprivation and peri-operative outcomes in endometrial cancer patients.
OBJECTIVES: METHODS: This is a retrospective study of surgically managed endometrial cancerpatients in the Royal Cornwall Hospital Truro between January 2006 and August 2017. Patient characteristics, overall survival, recurrence free survival and intra- and postoperative outcomes were evaluated across socioeconomic deprivation groups in which socioeconomic deprivation was measured with the English Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). RESULTS: In total, we identified 831 women, of which 690 were included. The median age was 66 years with a median BMI of 31 and the majority of tumours were endometrioid tumours (80.1%). For type 1 (endometrioid) tumours, better survival was seen in the least deprived patients, however this was not significant in a multivariate analysis and only age, stage and BMI remained significant. For type 2 (all other) tumours, no association between survival and socioeconomic deprivation was found and only stage was significant. However, more affluent patients had significantly higher recurrence rates. In addition, we did not find evidence of an association between intra- or post-operative complication rates and socioeconomic deprivation. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with survival in endometrial cancerpatients, however after adjusting for confounders this association does not remain. Only age, stage and BMI are independent prognostic factors for survival. In addition, there is no evidence of association between socioeconomic deprivation and peri-operative outcomes in endometrial cancerpatients.