| Literature DB >> 31759351 |
Rosethe Rimande-Joel1, Golda Obiageri Ekenedo1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The rising prevalence of cancer of the cervix especially in developing countries gives cause for concern. Fortunately, it can be prevented especially when the women at risk possess correct knowledge, have the right belief and access to screening and prevention services. Previous studies have reported poor knowledge and screening practices among women in developing countries raising the fear of continued spread. The aim of the study was to establish the cervical cancer knowledge, belief and prevention/screening practices among women in Taraba, North-East Nigeria.Entities:
Keywords: Keywords: Cervical cancer; Knowledge; Prevention; Screening; beliefs
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31759351 PMCID: PMC7063016 DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.11.3291
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Percentage and Mean Responses on Cervical Cancer Knowledge, Belief, Prevention and Screening Practices of Respondents (N = 978)
| Knowledge about cervical cancer | Correct % | Incorrect% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge about the nature of cervical cancer | 73.2 | 26.8 | ||||
| Knowledge of sign and symptoms | 76.5 | 23.5 | ||||
| Knowledge of risk factors | 88.1 | 11.9 | ||||
| Knowledge of cervical cancer prevention | 90.3 | 17.9 | ||||
| Overall % | 82.2 | 17.9 | ||||
| Beliefs about cervical cancer | Remarks | |||||
| I am young and cannot develop cervical cancer | 1.03 | -ve | ||||
| Cervical cancer is a deadly disease | 3.20 | +ve | ||||
| Promiscuity does not predispose to cervical cancer | 2.77 | +ve | ||||
| Cervical cancer is a punishment from the gods | 2.65 | +ve | ||||
| Cervical cancer is caused by witches and wizards | 2.71 | +ve | ||||
| It is embarrassing to undergo cervical pap test. | 2.66 | +ve | ||||
| Going for screening is lack of faith and belief in God | 2.19 | -ve | ||||
| The procedure for cervical cancer screening is painful | 2.02 | -ve | ||||
| If I know my status, I will die before my time | 2.33 | -ve | ||||
| I will be stigmatized if I test positive | 2.21 | -ve | ||||
| I will lose my virginity during the screening | 2.58 | +ve | ||||
| The test is unnecessary and without benefit | 2.91 | +ve | ||||
| Cervical cancer cannot be prevented | 2.60 | +ve | ||||
| Only the gods can prevent it | 2.75 | +ve | ||||
| It is a disease of illiterates | 2.57 | +ve | ||||
| Cervical cancer affects only married women | 2.01 | -ve | ||||
| Grand | 2.45 | -ve | ||||
| Cervical cancer screening and prevention practice | Always | Occasionally | Never | |||
| f | % | f | % | f | % | |
| I screen for cervical cancer (pap smear). | 38 | 3.9 | 279 | 28.5 | 661 | 67.6 |
| I examine my vagina for possible abnormality | 438 | 44.8 | 299 | 30.6 | 241 | 24.6 |
| I eat fruit & vegetables to prevent cervical cancer | 317 | 32.4 | 556 | 56.9 | 105 | 10.7 |
| I check my family for the history of cervical cancer | 91 | 9.3 | 322 | 32.9 | 565 | 57.8 |
| I take measures to avoid contracting STI | 685 | 70.0 | 268 | 27.4 | 25 | 2.6 |
| I do not keep multiple sexual partners | 925 | 94.6 | 39 | 4.0 | 14 | 1.4 |
| I avoid oral contraceptives due to its side effects | 579 | 49.2 | 358 | 36.6 | 41 | 4.2 |
| I go for treatment when I notice any sign of STI. | 794 | 81.2 | 180 | 18.4 | 4 | 0.4 |
| I have been vaccinated against cervical cancer | 113 | 11.6 | 28 | 2.9 | 837 | 85.6 |
| Overall% | 45.2 | 25.6 | 283 | |||
Summary of Chi-Square Analysis of No Significant Difference in the Knowledge about Cervical Cancer among the Women with Regards to the Location of Residence, Educational Status, Marital Status, Age and Religion
| Demographic variables | N | Cal.χ2 | df | tab.χ2 | p-value | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | 13.915 | 2 | 5.99 | 0.036 | Rejected | |
| Urban | 440 | |||||
| Semi-urban | 284 | |||||
| Rural | 254 | |||||
| Educationalstatus | 5.11 | 3 | 7.82 | 0.214 | Accepted | |
| Noformal | 150 | |||||
| Primary | 184 | |||||
| Secondary | 369 | |||||
| Tertiary | 275 | |||||
| Maritalstatus | 4.129 | 3 | 7.82 | 0.282 | Accepted | |
| Single | 213 | |||||
| Married | 567 | |||||
| Divorced | 72 | |||||
| Widowed | 126 | |||||
| Age | 4.483 | 3 | 7.82 | 0.207 | Accepted | |
| 16–30yrs. | 364 | |||||
| 31–44yrs. | 428 | |||||
| 45yr.+ | 186 | |||||
| Religion | 7.763 | 2 | 5.99 | 0.013 | Rejected | |
| Christianity | 513 | |||||
| Islam | 403 | |||||
| Others | 62 |
Chi-square two-tailed, α = 0.05
Summary of ANOVA Analysis of no Significant Difference in Beliefs about Cervical Cancer among the Women with Regards to the Location of Residence, Educational Status, Marital Status, Age and Religion
| Demographic variables | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | f-cal | tab. f | p-value | Decision | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location . | B/ G | 0.109 | 2 | 0.55 | ||||
| W/ G | 193.405 | 975 | 0.198 | |||||
| Total | 193.51 | 977 | 0.275 | 19.50 | 0.760 | Accepted | ||
| Educational Status | B/ G | 0.721 | 3 | 0.240 | ||||
| W/ G | 192.793 | 947 | 0.198 | |||||
| Total | 193.714 | 977 | 1.215 | 8.53 | 0.303 | Accepted | ||
| Marital status | B/ G | 4.857 | 3 | 1.619 | ||||
| W/ G | 188.658 | 947 | 0.194 | |||||
| Total | 193.514 | 977 | 8.358 | 8.53 | 0.000 | Rejected | ||
| Age | B/ G | 3.258 | 3 | |||||
| W/ G | 190.256 | 947 | 1.629 | |||||
| Total | 193.514 | 977 | 0.195 | 8.349 | 8.53 | 0.000 | Rejected | |
| Religion | B/ G | 0.242 | 2 | |||||
| W/ G | 193.273 | 975 | 0.121 | |||||
| Total | 193.514 | 977 | 0.198 | 0.610 | 19.50 | 0.543 | Accepted |
Summary of Chi-Square Analysis of No Significant Difference in the Practice of Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention among the Women with Regards to the Location of Residence, Educational Status, Marital Status, Age and Religion
| Demographic variables | N | Cal. χ2 | df | tab. χ2 | p-value | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | 15.052 | 2 | 5.99 | 0.005 | Rejected | |
| Urban | 440 | |||||
| Semi-urban | 284 | |||||
| Rural | 254 | |||||
| Educational status | 6.426 | 3 | 7.82 | 0.377 | Accepted | |
| No formal | 150 | |||||
| Primary | 184 | |||||
| Secondary | 369 | |||||
| Tertiary | 275 | |||||
| Marital status | 5.347 | 3 | 7.82 | 0.500 | Accepted | |
| Single | 213 | |||||
| Married | 567 | |||||
| Divorced | 72 | |||||
| Widowed | 126 | |||||
| Age | 3.240 | 3 | 7.82 | 0.519 | Accepted | |
| 16 -30yrs | 364 | |||||
| 31-44yrs | 248 | |||||
| 45yrs + | 186 | |||||
| Religion | 26.486 | 2 | 5.99 | 0.000 | Rejected | |
| Christianity | 513 | |||||
| Islam | 403 | |||||
| Others | 62 |
Chi-Square two-tailed, α = 0.05