Literature DB >> 31759132

Spine Explorer: a deep learning based fully automated program for efficient and reliable quantifications of the vertebrae and discs on sagittal lumbar spine MR images.

Jiawei Huang1, Haotian Shen1, Jialong Wu1, Xiaojian Hu1, Zhiwei Zhu2, Xiaoqiang Lv3, Yong Liu4, Yue Wang5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although quantitative measurements improve the assessment of disc degeneration, acquirement of quantitative measurements relies on manual segmentation on lumbar magnetic resonance images (MRIs), which may introduce subjective bias. To date, only a few semiautomatic systems have been developed to quantify important components on MRIs.
PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning based program (Spine Explorer) for automated segmentation and quantification of the vertebrae and intervertebral discs on lumbar spine MRIs. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The study was extended on the Hangzhou Lumbar Spine Study, a population-based study of mainland Chinese with focuses on lumbar degenerative changes. From this population-based database, 50 sets lumbar MRIs were randomly selected as training dataset, and another 50 as test dataset. OUTCOME MEASURES: Regions of vertebrae and discs were manually segmented on T2W sagittal MRIs to train a convolutional neural network for automated segmentation. Intersection-over-union was calculated to evaluate segmentation performance. Computational definitions were proposed to acquire quantitative morphometric and signal measurements for lumbar vertebrae and discs. MRIs in the test dataset were automatically measured with Spine Explorer and manually with ImageJ.
METHODS: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to examine inter-software agreements. Correlations between disc measurements and Pfirrmann score as well as age were examined to assess measurement validity.
RESULTS: The trained Spine Explorer automatically segments and measures a lumbar MRI in half a second, with mean Intersection-over-union of 94.7% and 92.6% for the vertebra and disc, respectively. For both vertebra and disc measurements acquired with Spine Explorer and ImageJ, the agreements were excellent (ICC=0.81~1.00). Disc measurements significantly correlated to Pfirrmann score, and greater age was associated with greater anterior disc bulging area (r=0.35~0.44) and fewer signal measurements (r=-0.62~-0.77) as automatically acquired with Spine Explorer.
CONCLUSIONS: Spine Explorer is an efficient, accurate, and reliable tool to acquire comprehensive quantitative measurements for lumbar vertebra and disc. Implication of such deep learning based program can facilitate clinical studies of the lumbar spine.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Disc degeneration; II; Image processing; Level of Evidence; Lumbar spine; MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31759132     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  17 in total

1.  Automated selection of mid-height intervertebral disc slice in traverse lumbar spine MRI using a combination of deep learning feature and machine learning classifier.

Authors:  Friska Natalia; Julio Christian Young; Nunik Afriliana; Hira Meidia; Reyhan Eddy Yunus; Sud Sudirman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Machine Learning Algorithms in Neuroimaging: An Overview.

Authors:  Vittorio Stumpo; Julius M Kernbach; Christiaan H B van Niftrik; Martina Sebök; Jorn Fierstra; Luca Regli; Carlo Serra; Victor E Staartjes
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2022

Review 3.  Current development and prospects of deep learning in spine image analysis: a literature review.

Authors:  Biao Qu; Jianpeng Cao; Chen Qian; Jinyu Wu; Jianzhong Lin; Liansheng Wang; Lin Ou-Yang; Yongfa Chen; Liyue Yan; Qing Hong; Gaofeng Zheng; Xiaobo Qu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

4.  A deep learning framework for vertebral morphometry and Cobb angle measurement with external validation.

Authors:  Danis Alukaev; Semen Kiselev; Tamerlan Mustafaev; Ahatov Ainur; Bulat Ibragimov; Tomaž Vrtovec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 2.721

5.  The current role and future directions of imaging in failed back surgery syndrome patients: an educational review.

Authors:  Richard L Witkam; Constantinus F Buckens; Johan W M van Goethem; Kris C P Vissers; Dylan J H A Henssen
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-07-15

6.  Spinopelvic measurements of sagittal balance with deep learning: systematic review and critical evaluation.

Authors:  Tomaž Vrtovec; Bulat Ibragimov
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.721

7.  Automated measurement of anteroposterior diameter and foraminal widths in MRI images for lumbar spinal stenosis diagnosis.

Authors:  Friska Natalia; Hira Meidia; Nunik Afriliana; Julio Christian Young; Reyhan Eddy Yunus; Mohammed Al-Jumaily; Ala Al-Kafri; Sud Sudirman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Review on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Diseases.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Taravat Yazdanian; Edward C Benzel; Hossein Nayeb Aghaei; Shirzad Azhari; Sohrab Sadeghi; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-04-24

Review 9.  AI musculoskeletal clinical applications: how can AI increase my day-to-day efficiency?

Authors:  YiRang Shin; Sungjun Kim; Young Han Lee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Nanocarriers surface engineered with cell membranes for cancer targeted chemotherapy.

Authors:  Wen Lei; Chen Yang; Yi Wu; Guoqing Ru; Xianglei He; Xiangmin Tong; Shibing Wang
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 10.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.