Literature DB >> 31758981

How Many Cores Should be Obtained During Saturation Biopsy in the Era of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance? Experience in 875 Patients Submitted to Repeat Prostate Biopsy.

Pietro Pepe1, Michele Pennisi2, Filippo Fraggetta3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the number of needle cores combined with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) findings needed to diagnose all clinically significant cases of prostate cancer (csPCa) in men subject to transperineal saturation biopsy (SPBx; 30 cores).
METHODS: From January 2016 to June 2019, 875 men (median age 63 years) underwent repeat SPBx (median 30 cores) for the suspicion of cancer. All of the patients underwent for the first time 3.0 Tesla pelvic mpMRI before SPBx, and the lesions with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System category ≥3 underwent additional transperineal-targeted fusion prostate biopsies (TPBx).
RESULTS: StageT1c PCa was found in 306/875 (34.5%), and 222/306 (72.5%) of them were classified as csPCa. SPBx missed 2/222 (1%) csPCa with International Society of Urologic Pathology Grade Group (GG) 3. TBPx missed 33/222 (14.9%) csPCa (21 vs 12 cases were GG1 vs GG3). The initial 20 needle SPBx cores obtained from the peripheric (16 cores) and anterior gland (4 cores) diagnosed all of the 222 (100%) csPCa only missing 84/129 (65.1%) indolent PCa thus presenting diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity equal to 83.1%, 100%, and 65.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In men subject to mpMRI and/or TPBx, a maximum of 20 systematic transperineal needle cores detected all cases of csPCa and minimized the diagnosis of indolent cancers.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31758981     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  Clinical Outcomes of Hydrogel Spacer Injection Space OAR in Men Submitted to Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Pietro Pepe; Maria Tamburo; Michele Pennisi; Dario Marletta; Francesco Marletta
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Improved oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients staged with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET: a single-center retrospective cohort comparison.

Authors:  Daniela A Ferraro; Fabienne Lehner; Daniel Eberli; Irene A Burger; Anton S Becker; Benedikt Kranzbühler; Ken Kudura; Iliana Mebert; Michael Messerli; Thomas Hermanns
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Identifying Risk Factors for MRI-Invisible Prostate Cancer in Patients Undergoing Transperineal Saturation Biopsy.

Authors:  Alberto Artiles Medina; Rafael Rodríguez-Patrón Rodríguez; Mercedes Ruiz Hernández; Marina Mata Alcaraz; Silvia García Barreras; Guillermo Fernández Conejo; Agustín Fraile Poblador; Enrique Sanz Mayayo; Francisco Javier Burgos Revilla
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-09-27

Review 4.  Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Spyridon P Basourakos; Mark N Alshak; Patrick J Lewicki; Emily Cheng; Michael Tzeng; Antonio P DeRosa; Mathew J Allaway; Ashley E Ross; Edward M Schaeffer; Hiten D Patel; Jim C Hu; Michael A Gorin
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-01-29

5.  Analysis of the cause of missed diagnosis in mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided targeted prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Shun Zhang; Haifeng Huang; Qing Zhang; Shengjie Zhang; Shiwei Zhang; Hongqian Guo
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 2.090

6.  Could 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Evaluation Reduce the Number of Scheduled Prostate Biopsies in Men Enrolled in Active Surveillance Protocols?

Authors:  Pietro Pepe; Marco Roscigno; Ludovica Pepe; Paolo Panella; Marinella Tamburo; Giulia Marletta; Francesco Savoca; Giuseppe Candiano; Sebastiano Cosentino; Massimo Ippolito; Andreas Tsirgiotis; Michele Pennisi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.964

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.