W H Richter1, R Koytchev2, V Kirkov3, G Merki4, E Colli5, P-A Regidor6. 1. CCDRD AG, Germany. Electronic address: wrichter@ccdrdag.com. 2. CCDRD AG, Germany. Electronic address: rkoytchev@ccdrdag.com. 3. MHAT Tokuda Hospital, Bulgaria. Electronic address: v.kirkov@mail.bg. 4. Klinik für Reproduktions-Endokrinologie, Universitäts Spital Zürich, Switzerland. Electronic address: gabriele.merki@usz.ch. 5. Exeltis Healthcare, Germany. Electronic address: enrico.colli@exeltis.com. 6. Exeltis Healthcare, Germany. Electronic address: pedro-antonio.regidor@exeltis.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drospirenone (DRSP), alone versus in combination with ethinyl estradiol (EE), after single and repeated administration. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a single-centre, open-label, crossover, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence study in which non-micronized DRSP 4 mg or a combination of DRSP 3 mg and EE 0.02 mg were administered to healthy female subjects on day 1 to obtain a single-dose kinetic profile, and from day 4 to day 15 to obtain a repeated-dose kinetic profile. The maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration/time curve (AUC) were determined in a model-independent way using non dose corrected data. Statistical analysis was based on a parametric method (ANOVA-log). RESULTS: A total of 24 healthy female subjects were randomized 1:1 into the study. The mean relative, non-dose-corrected PK estimates after single-dose administration for the endpoints AUC(0-72h), AUC(0-24h) and Cmax were 543.5 ng*h/mL, 296.1 ng*h/mL and 27.3 ng/mL for DRSP alone, and 442.0 ng*h/mL, 264.7 ng*h/mL and 37.5 ng/mL for the DRSP/EE combination; p < 0.001. The mean relative, non-dose-corrected PK estimates after repeated dose administration for the endpoints AUC(0-72h), AUC(0-24h) and Cmax were 1066.8 ng*h/ml, 570.2 ng*h/mL and 41.0 ng/mL for DRSP alone, and 1394.5 ng*h/mL, 732.8 ng*h/mL and 61.4 ng/mL for the DRSP/EE combination; p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS:DRSP alone exhibits a lower accumulation ratio than together with EE. The extent of systemic exposure at steady-state is about 32% less with the new formulation (AUC(0-24h), steady-state geometric mean ratio: 77.8%; 90% confidence interval: 74.6%-81.1%). This PK profile may be caused by EE. IMPLICATIONS: Our results suggest that metabolic pathways of DRSP can be inhibited by EE resulting in higher DRSP plasma concentrations in DRSP/EE formulations than in a DRSP-alone formulation. The enzymes CYP3A4 and SULT1A1 may play a role. Additional drug-drug-interaction studies are needed to better understand these metabolic pathways and their future clinical implications.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drospirenone (DRSP), alone versus in combination with ethinyl estradiol (EE), after single and repeated administration. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a single-centre, open-label, crossover, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence study in which non-micronized DRSP 4 mg or a combination of DRSP 3 mg and EE 0.02 mg were administered to healthy female subjects on day 1 to obtain a single-dose kinetic profile, and from day 4 to day 15 to obtain a repeated-dose kinetic profile. The maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration/time curve (AUC) were determined in a model-independent way using non dose corrected data. Statistical analysis was based on a parametric method (ANOVA-log). RESULTS: A total of 24 healthy female subjects were randomized 1:1 into the study. The mean relative, non-dose-corrected PK estimates after single-dose administration for the endpoints AUC(0-72h), AUC(0-24h) and Cmax were 543.5 ng*h/mL, 296.1 ng*h/mL and 27.3 ng/mL for DRSP alone, and 442.0 ng*h/mL, 264.7 ng*h/mL and 37.5 ng/mL for the DRSP/EE combination; p < 0.001. The mean relative, non-dose-corrected PK estimates after repeated dose administration for the endpoints AUC(0-72h), AUC(0-24h) and Cmax were 1066.8 ng*h/ml, 570.2 ng*h/mL and 41.0 ng/mL for DRSP alone, and 1394.5 ng*h/mL, 732.8 ng*h/mL and 61.4 ng/mL for the DRSP/EE combination; p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS:DRSP alone exhibits a lower accumulation ratio than together with EE. The extent of systemic exposure at steady-state is about 32% less with the new formulation (AUC(0-24h), steady-state geometric mean ratio: 77.8%; 90% confidence interval: 74.6%-81.1%). This PK profile may be caused by EE. IMPLICATIONS: Our results suggest that metabolic pathways of DRSP can be inhibited by EE resulting in higher DRSP plasma concentrations in DRSP/EE formulations than in a DRSP-alone formulation. The enzymes CYP3A4 and SULT1A1 may play a role. Additional drug-drug-interaction studies are needed to better understand these metabolic pathways and their future clinical implications.