Literature DB >> 31758479

Concentration of phthalate esters in indoor and outdoor dust in Kocaeli, Turkey: implications for human exposure and risk.

Bilgehan Başaran1, Gizem Nur Soylu1, Mihriban Yılmaz Civan2.   

Abstract

The interest in phthalate esters (PAEs) has increased in recent years because elevated phthalate levels have been detected in environmental matrices and they have certain adverse effects on human health. Indoor dust from 90 homes and outdoor (street) dust from outside these homes were collected in Kocaeli province between February and April 2016 and analyzed for eight PAEs. The total indoor dust concentrations of eight PAEs (Σ8PAEs) ranged from 21.33 μg g-1 to 1802 μg g-1 (median, 387.67 μg g-1), significantly higher than outdoor dust concentrations (0.16-36.85 μg g-1 with median 4.84 μg g-1). Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) was the most dominant pollutant in both indoor and outdoor environments with a median value of 316.02 μg g-1 and 3.89 μg g-1, respectively, followed by di-n-butyl phthalate and butylbenzyl phthalate (BBP). DEHP was measured within the range of 198.54-816.92 μg g-1 and BBP within the range of 15.52-495.33 μg g-1 in homes with PVC coating, significantly higher than the levels in homes with parquet and tiled floor (p<0.05). Monte Carlo simulation was applied to probabilistically estimate exposure to PAEs and associated carcinogenic risk. The Σ5PAE median values of non-dietary ingestion and dermal absorption exposure were estimated as 1.57 μg kg day-1 and 0.007 μg kg day-1 for children and 0.09 μg kg day-1 and 0.04 μg kg day-1 for adults while inhalation route exposure to PAE in dust was at a negligible level for both groups. Children were more exposed to PAEs through ingestion route (92.74% to 99.54% of the total exposure) while adult exposure through ingestion routes (62-68.4%) and dermal absorption (29.74% and 31.87% of the total exposure) were comparable. The mean cancer risk level via non-dietary ingestion of DEHP for children was 2.33×10-6, about eight times higher than the levels for adults. The risk levels of about 16% of adults and 95% of children are greater than the threshold value of 10-6 when the population is exposed to DEHP in indoor dust. Looking from the viewpoint of child health, the most effective method to reduce exposure among the measured PAEs is to keep the release of DEHP under control, especially in indoor environment, and to take precautions to reduce exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exposure assessment; Indoor dust; Monte Carlo simulation; Outdoor (street) dust; Phthalate esters; Risk estimation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31758479     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06815-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  58 in total

1.  Determining source strength of semivolatile organic compounds using measured concentrations in indoor dust.

Authors:  H-M Shin; T E McKone; M G Nishioka; M D Fallin; L A Croen; I Hertz-Picciotto; C J Newschaffer; D H Bennett
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.770

2.  Common SVOCs in house dust from urban dwellings with schoolchildren in six typical cities of China and associated non-dietary exposure and health risk assessment.

Authors:  Guangtao Fan; Jingchao Xie; Hiroshi Yoshino; Huibo Zhang; Zhenhai Li; Nianping Li; Jing Liu; Yang Lv; Shengwei Zhu; U Yanagi; Kenichi Hasegawa; Naoki Kagi; Xiaojing Zhang; Jiaping Liu
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Multi-pathway human exposure assessment of phthalate esters and DINCH.

Authors:  Georgios Giovanoulis; Thuy Bui; Fuchao Xu; Eleni Papadopoulou; Juan A Padilla-Sanchez; Adrian Covaci; Line S Haug; Anna Palm Cousins; Jörgen Magnér; Ian T Cousins; Cynthia A de Wit
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Characteristics and assessment of phthalate esters in urban dusts in Guangzhou city, China.

Authors:  Qing Lan; Kunyan Cui; Feng Zeng; Fang Zhu; Hong Liu; Hongli Chen; Yongqing Ma; Jiaxin Wen; Tiangang Luan; Guoquan Sun; Zunxiang Zeng
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Comparative assessment of human exposure to phthalate esters from house dust in China and the United States.

Authors:  Ying Guo; Kurunthachalam Kannan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Phthalate exposure and risk assessment in California child care facilities.

Authors:  Fraser W Gaspar; Rosemary Castorina; Randy L Maddalena; Marcia G Nishioka; Thomas E McKone; Asa Bradman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Semi-volatile organic compounds in the air and dust of 30 French schools: a pilot study.

Authors:  G Raffy; F Mercier; O Blanchard; M Derbez; C Dassonville; N Bonvallot; P Glorennec; B Le Bot
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.770

8.  Hazardous substances in indoor dust emitted from waste TV recycling facility.

Authors:  Jingjing Deng; Jie Guo; Xiaoyu Zhou; Peng Zhou; Xiaoxu Fu; Wei Zhang; Kuangfei Lin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 9.  Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in the indoor and outdoor environments--a review on occurrence and human exposure.

Authors:  Athanasios Besis; Constantini Samara
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  Modeling Human Exposure to Phthalate Esters: A Comparison of Indirect and Biomonitoring Estimation Methods.

Authors:  Kathryn E Clark; Raymond M David; Richard Guinn; Kurt W Kramarz; Mark A Lampi; Charles A Staples
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 5.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.