BaoJun Wang1, Jie Gao1, Qing Zhang1, Yao Fu2, Guangxiang Liu1, Jiong Shi2, Danyan Li3, Feng Wang4, Hongqian Guo5. 1. Department of Urology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Institute of Urology Nanjing University, Jiangsu Province, China. 2. Department of Pathology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. 3. Department of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; and. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. 5. Department of Urology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Institute of Urology Nanjing University, Jiangsu Province, China dr.ghq@nju.edu.cn.
Abstract
Our purpose was to explore the value of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT for detection of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-loss prostate cancer. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 75 patients who underwent multiparametric MRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT before radical prostatectomy. Lesions were outlined on pathologic images, and regions of interest were drawn on matched multiparametric MRI and PET/CT images. Imaging parameters, including average apparent diffusion coefficient and SUVmax, were derived. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to evaluate the PTEN status. The diagnostic performance of imaging parameters was analyzed by receiver-operating-characteristic analysis. Univariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between clinical and imaging variables and PTEN status. Results: In total, 103 lesions from 75 patients were analyzed. Of these lesions, 38 of 103 (36.9%) showed PTEN-loss status. Our study showed a strong association between SUVmax and PTEN-loss tumors both in the per-patient analysis (P < 0.01) and in the per-lesion analysis (P < 0.01), yielding sensitivity and specificity of 0.80 and 0.77, respectively, in the per-patient analysis and 0.83 and 0.74, respectively, in the per-lesion analysis. Meanwhile, higher pathologic PSMA expression was found in the PTEN-deficiency tumors. However, there was no significant difference between PTEN-loss tumors and PTEN-intact tumors using parameters such as average apparent diffusion coefficient (P > 0.05) and score on the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, version 2 (P > 0.05). Surprisingly, SUVmax was a significant predictor for detection of PTEN-loss tumors (odds ratio of 7.56 and 95% confidence interval of 2.18-26.24 on per-patient analysis; odds ratio of 13.66 and 95% confidence interval of 4.32-43.24 on per-lesion analysis). Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT could effectively detect aggressive PTEN-loss tumors.
Our purpose was to explore the value of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT for detection of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-loss prostate cancer. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 75 patients who underwent multiparametric MRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT before radical prostatectomy. Lesions were outlined on pathologic images, and regions of interest were drawn on matched multiparametric MRI and PET/CT images. Imaging parameters, including average apparent diffusion coefficient and SUVmax, were derived. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to evaluate the PTEN status. The diagnostic performance of imaging parameters was analyzed by receiver-operating-characteristic analysis. Univariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between clinical and imaging variables and PTEN status. Results: In total, 103 lesions from 75 patients were analyzed. Of these lesions, 38 of 103 (36.9%) showed PTEN-loss status. Our study showed a strong association between SUVmax and PTEN-loss tumors both in the per-patient analysis (P < 0.01) and in the per-lesion analysis (P < 0.01), yielding sensitivity and specificity of 0.80 and 0.77, respectively, in the per-patient analysis and 0.83 and 0.74, respectively, in the per-lesion analysis. Meanwhile, higher pathologic PSMA expression was found in the PTEN-deficiency tumors. However, there was no significant difference between PTEN-loss tumors and PTEN-intact tumors using parameters such as average apparent diffusion coefficient (P > 0.05) and score on the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, version 2 (P > 0.05). Surprisingly, SUVmax was a significant predictor for detection of PTEN-loss tumors (odds ratio of 7.56 and 95% confidence interval of 2.18-26.24 on per-patient analysis; odds ratio of 13.66 and 95% confidence interval of 4.32-43.24 on per-lesion analysis). Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT could effectively detect aggressive PTEN-loss tumors.
Authors: Christos Sachpekidis; Klaus Kopka; Matthias Eder; Boris A Hadaschik; Martin T Freitag; Leyun Pan; Uwe Haberkorn; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss Journal: Clin Nucl Med Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 7.794
Authors: Christian Uprimny; Alexander Stephan Kroiss; Clemens Decristoforo; Josef Fritz; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Dorota Kendler; Lorenza Scarpa; Gianpaolo di Santo; Llanos Geraldo Roig; Johanna Maffey-Steffan; Wolfgang Horninger; Irene Johanna Virgolini Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Isabel Rauscher; Christina Bluemel; Wolfgang P Fendler; Steven P Rowe; Martin G Pomper; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Ken Herrmann; Matthias Eiber Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-07-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Lei Chang; Peter H Graham; Jie Ni; Jingli Hao; Joseph Bucci; Paul J Cozzi; Yong Li Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2015-07-18 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Jeffrey S Ross; Christine E Sheehan; Hugh A G Fisher; Ronald P Kaufman; Prabhjot Kaur; Karen Gray; Iain Webb; Gary S Gray; Rebecca Mosher; Bhaskar V S Kallakury Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Rachel M Squillace; David Miller; Scott D Wardwell; Frank Wang; Tim Clackson; Victor M Rivera Journal: Int J Oncol Date: 2012-05-18 Impact factor: 5.650
Authors: Alec Paschalis; Beshara Sheehan; Ruth Riisnaes; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Bora Gurel; Claudia Bertan; Ana Ferreira; Maryou B K Lambros; George Seed; Wei Yuan; David Dolling; Jon C Welti; Antje Neeb; Semini Sumanasuriya; Pasquale Rescigno; Diletta Bianchini; Nina Tunariu; Suzanne Carreira; Adam Sharp; Wim Oyen; Johann S de Bono Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 20.096