Literature DB >> 31757715

The mean absolute dose deviation-A common metric for the evaluation of dose-volume histograms in radiation therapy.

Vincent Vinh-Hung1, Nicolas Leduc2, Dirk Verellen3, Claire Verschraegen4, Giovanna Dipasquale5, Nam P Nguyen6.   

Abstract

Radiation therapy needs to balance between delivering a high dose to targets and the lowest possible dose to the organs at risk. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) summarize the distribution of radiation doses in the irradiated structures. The interpretation can however be a challenge when the number of structures is high. We propose the use of a simple summary metric. We define the mean absolute dose deviation (MADD) as the average of absolute differences between a DVH and a reference dose. The properties are evaluated through numerical analysis. Calculus trivially shows the identity of the MADD and the area between curves, between DVH and reference dose. Computation of the MADD is the same regardless of structures' designation, whether organ at risk or target, on the same dose scale. Basic calculus properties open the perspective of applying the MADD to the evaluation of treatment plans.
Copyright © 2019 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Area between curves; Dose volume histogram; Radiation therapy; Treatment planning

Year:  2019        PMID: 31757715     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  4 in total

1.  Two-Level Factorial Pre-TomoBreast Pilot Study of Tomotherapy and Conventional Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer: Post Hoc Utility of a Mean Absolute Dose Deviation Penalty Score.

Authors:  Steve Heymann; Giovanna Dipasquale; Nam P Nguyen; Meymey San; Olena Gorobets; Nicolas Leduc; Dirk Verellen; Guy Storme; Hilde Van Parijs; Mark De Ridder; Vincent Vinh-Hung
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

2.  Is prone free breathing better than supine deep inspiration breath-hold for left whole-breast radiotherapy? A dosimetric analysis.

Authors:  Xinzhuo Wang; Odile Fargier-Bochaton; Giovanna Dipasquale; Mohamed Laouiti; Melpomeni Kountouri; Olena Gorobets; Nam P Nguyen; Raymond Miralbell; Vincent Vinh-Hung
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Prone versus supine free-breathing for right-sided whole breast radiotherapy.

Authors:  Odile Fargier-Bochaton; Xinzhuo Wang; Giovanna Dipasquale; Mohamed Laouiti; Melpomeni Kountouri; Olena Gorobets; Nam P Nguyen; Raymond Miralbell; Vincent Vinh-Hung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A Minimal PKPD Interaction Model for Evaluating Synergy Effects of Combined NSCLC Therapies.

Authors:  Clara Mihaela Ionescu; Maria Ghita; Dana Copot; Eric Derom; Dirk Verellen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.