Literature DB >> 31757660

Target region resection in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal metastases-is it necessary in absence of visible disease?

Aditi Bhatt1, Yutaka Yonemura2, Sanket Mehta3, Nazim Benzerdjeb4, Praveen Kammar3, Loma Parikh5, Mita Y Shah6, Sakina Shaikh1, Aruna Prabhu7, Suniti Mishra8, Snita Sinukumar9, Vahan Kepenekian10, Naoual Bakrin10, Guillaume Passot10, Olivier Glehen11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim was to study the patterns of target region (greater omentum, lesser omentum, falciform and umbilical round ligament) involvement in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) from various primary tumors, factors affecting involvement and implications on surgical practice.
METHODS: All patients undergoing CRS from July 2018 to December 2018 were included in this prospective study. The incidence of target region involvement in presence and absence of visible disease and the impact of primary tumor site, PCI and other variables on target region involvement was evaluated.
RESULTS: In 191 patients, greater omentum was involved in over 15% of patients irrespective of the primary tumor type and in 15.7% in absence of visible disease. 75% of these had PCI <20. The involvement of the other three target regions was higher than 20% in ovarian cancer, appendiceal tumors and peritoneal mesothelioma. Involvement of these 3 regions was associated with a higher PCI (p < 0.001 for all) and omental involvement (p < 0.001for all). 2.1% of colorectal cancer patients had umbilical round ligament involvement, 4.2% had falciform ligament involvement and none had lesser omentum involvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Target region involvement varies according to primary tumour site and disease extent. Resection of the greater omentum should be performed during CRS for PM arising from all primary sites. Resection of other target organs may be performed for selected patients with ovarian cancer, peritoneal mesothelioma and mucinous appendiceal tumors in absence of visible disease. For other patients, it should be done only in presence of visible disease.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytoreductive surgery; Ligamentum teres; Omental resection; Target region resection; falciform ligament; lesser omentum

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31757660     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current Trends in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Peritoneal Disease from Appendiceal and Colorectal Malignancies.

Authors:  Megan M Harper; Joseph Kim; Prakash K Pandalai
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Clinical and Radiologic Predictors of a Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: Results of a Prospective Multi-center Study.

Authors:  Aditi Bhatt; Pascal Rousset; Nazim Benzerdjeb; Praveen Kammar; Sanket Mehta; Loma Parikh; Gaurav Goswami; Sakina Shaikh; Vahan Kepenekian; Guillaume Passot; Olivier Glehen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Platinum resistant recurrence and early recurrence in a multi-centre cohort of patients undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Aditi Bhatt; Snita Sinukumar; Vahan Kepenekian; Praveen Kammar; Sanket Mehta; Sakina Shaikh; Witold Gertych; Naoual Bakrin; Olivier Glehen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Patterns of peritoneal dissemination and response to systemic chemotherapy in common and rare peritoneal tumours treated by cytoreductive surgery: study protocol of a prospective, multicentre, observational study.

Authors:  Aditi Bhatt; Pascal Rousset; Dario Baratti; Daniele Biacchi; Nazim Benzerdjeb; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Marcello Deraco; Vadim Gushchin; Praveen Kammar; Daniel Labow; Edward Levine; Brendan Moran; Faheez Mohamed; David Morris; Sanket Mehta; Aviram Nissan; Mohammad Alyami; Mohammad Adileh; Shoma Barat; Almog Ben Yacov; Kurtis Campbell; Kathleen Cummins-Perry; Delia Cortes-Guiral; Noah Cohen; Loma Parikh; Samer Alammari; Galal Bashanfer; Anwar Alshukami; Kaushal Kundalia; Gaurav Goswami; Vincent van de Vlasakker; Michelle Sittig; Paolo Sammartino; Armando Sardi; Laurent Villeneuve; Kiran Turaga; Yutaka Yonemura; Olivier Glehen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Comparison of model fit and discriminatory ability of M category as defined by the 7th and 8th editions of the tumor-node-metastasis classification of colorectal cancer and the 9th edition of the Japanese classification.

Authors:  Dai Shida; Narikazu Boku; Yuya Nakamura; Takefumi Yoshida; Taro Tanabe; Kohei Yasui; Atsuo Takashima; Yukihide Kanemitsu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.