Literature DB >> 31756823

Blood lead levels in children in urban and rural areas: Using multilevel modeling to investigate impacts of gender, race, poverty, and the environment.

C M Aelion1, H T Davis2.   

Abstract

Many studies of children's exposure to lead (Pb) are carried out in urban and industrialized environments. This study analyzed blood lead level (BLL) data collected from 2011 to 2016 from approximately 140,000 children ages <1 to 6 years across South Carolina (SC), including urban and rural areas. Individual-level characteristics included children's age, and race/ethnicity. Block group variables examined included population by race and ethnicity, households below the poverty level, median year homes built, urban/rural classification, and percent road coverage. BLL were higher in urban compared to rural children but increased to a greater extent in rural children from age < 1 year to 2 years. Road coverage was strongly associated with higher BLL in urban areas, and with home age more weakly, but neither road coverage nor home age was associated with BLL in rural areas. Young urban children may receive greater exposure to Pb from house dust and outdoor legacy Pb contamination, and young rural children through diet and drinking water. Black children had higher BLL in urban areas than white children, and the converse was true in rural areas. Population data indicated that rural areas had more poverty than urban areas, but strong associations between increased children's BLL and either ethnicity or socio-economic status (SES) at the block group level was not observed, likely due to distinct characteristics of poverty and geographic distribution by ethnicity in urban as compared to rural areas of SC. Individual demographics and environmental characteristics may be more closely associated with BLL than geographically aggregated SES and race/ethnicity characteristics. Interventions to reduce children's exposure to Pb should occur at as early an age as possible, and differences between rural and urban areas should be considered as interventions are developed to reduce children's BLL.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental sources of lead; Lead exposure; Racial differences; Spatial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31756823     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive Impairment Induced by Lead Exposure during Lifespan: Mechanisms of Lead Neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Daniela Ramírez Ortega; Dinora F González Esquivel; Tonali Blanco Ayala; Benjamín Pineda; Saul Gómez Manzo; Jaime Marcial Quino; Paul Carrillo Mora; Verónica Pérez de la Cruz
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-01-28

2.  Neighborhood Poverty in Combination with Older Housing Is Associated with Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Study on Ubiquitous Lead Risk among 1 Million Births in Texas.

Authors:  Bethany Marie Wood; Catherine Cubbin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Childhood Maltreatment, Blood Lead Levels, and Crime and Violence: A Prospective Examination.

Authors:  Cathy Spatz Widom; Xuechen Li; Anthony Carpi
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-28

4.  Rural and Urban Ecologies of Early Childhood Toxic Lead Exposure: The State of Kansas, 2005 to 2012.

Authors:  Deniz Yeter; Deena Woodall; Matthew Dietrich; Barbara Polivka
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2022-08-22

5.  Increased Risk of Sub-Clinical Blood Lead Levels in the 20-County Metro Atlanta, Georgia Area-A Laboratory Surveillance-Based Study.

Authors:  Carmen M Dickinson-Copeland; Lilly Cheng Immergluck; Maria Britez; Fengxia Yan; Ruijin Geng; Mike Edelson; Salathiel R Kendrick-Allwood; Katarzyna Kordas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  The urban lead (Pb) burden in humans, animals and the natural environment.

Authors:  Ronnie Levin; Carolina L Zilli Vieira; Marieke H Rosenbaum; Karyn Bischoff; Daniel C Mordarski; Mary Jean Brown
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 8.431

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.