Literature DB >> 31756669

Collecting oral fluid samples from due-to-wean litters.

M N Almeida1, H Rotto2, P Schneider2, C Robb2, J J Zimmerman1, D J Holtkamp1, C J Rademacher1, D C L Linhares3.   

Abstract

Oral fluids are a common diagnostic sample in group-housed nursery, grow-finish, and adult swine. Although oral fluids from due-to-wean litters could be a valuable tool in monitoring pathogens and predicting the health status of pig populations post-weaning, it is generally not done because of inconsistent success in sample collection. The objective of this study was to determine the optimum procedure for collecting oral fluid samples from due-to-wean litters. Successful collection of oral fluids from due-to-wean litters using "Litter Oral Fluid" (LOF) or "Family Oral Fluid" (FOF) sampling techniques were compared in 4 phases involving 920 attempts to collect oral fluids. Phase 1 testing showed that prior exposure to a rope improved the success rates of both LOF (33.4%) and FOF (16.4%) techniques. Phase 2 determined that longer access to the rope (4 h vs 30 min) did not improve the success rate for either LOF or FOF. Phase 3 evaluated the effect of attractants and found that one (Baby Pig Restart®) improved the success rate when used with the FOF technique. Phase 4 compared the success rates of "optimized LOF" (litters previously trained) vs "optimized FOF" (litter previously trained and rope treated with Baby Pig Restart®) vs standard FOF. No difference was found between the FOF-based techniques, but both were superior to the "optimized LOF" technique. Thus, FOF-based procedures provided a significantly higher probability of collecting oral fluids from due-to-wean litters (mean success rate 84.9%, range 70% to 92%) when compared to LOF-based methods (mean success rate 24.1%, range 16.5% to 32.2%).
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oral fluids; Surveillance; Swine

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31756669     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  5 in total

1.  Longitudinal piglet sampling in commercial sow farms highlights the challenge of PRRSV detection.

Authors:  Marcelo Nunes de Almeida; Cesar A Corzo; Jeffrey J Zimmerman; Daniel Correia Lima Linhares
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-04-12

2.  Systematic review of animal-based indicators to measure thermal, social, and immune-related stress in pigs.

Authors:  Raúl David Guevara; Jose J Pastor; Xavier Manteca; Gemma Tedo; Pol Llonch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus RNA detection in tongue tips from dead animals.

Authors:  Isadora F Machado; Edison S Magalhães; Ana Paula S Poeta Silva; Daniel C A Moraes; Guilherme Cezar; Mafalda P Mil-Homens; Onyekachukwu H Osemeke; Rodrigo Paiva; Cesar A A Moura; Phillip Gauger; Giovani Trevisan; Gustavo S Silva; Daniel C L Linhares
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-21

4.  Feasibility of pooled oral fluid collection from pre-weaning piglets using cotton ropes.

Authors:  Gwenaël Boulbria; Valérie Normand; Mily Leblanc-Maridor; Catherine Belloc; Pauline Berton; Franck Bouchet; Arnaud Lebret
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-13

5.  The Use of Attractants to Stimulate Neonatal Piglet Interest in Rope Enrichment.

Authors:  Emiline R Sundman; Nicholas K Gabler; Suzanne T Millman; Kenneth J Stalder; Locke A Karriker; Anna K Johnson
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.