Mark Cronshaw1, Steven Parker1, Eugenia Anagnostaki1, Edward Lynch2. 1. Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy. 2. School of Dental Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review of published research evaluates the parameters and reported outcomes in photobiomodulation therapies (PBMTs) used in management of pain and accelerated tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. Background: Consequent to positive in vitro and animal studies, there has been considerable interest in the potential applications of PBMT to ameliorate pain and to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement. Due to the lack of consistency of wavelengths and parameters applied, there is as yet no consensus in respect of guidance for clinical use. Within the limitations of the reported literature, a digest of key outcomes and parameters is presented here to assist researchers and interested clinicians. Materials and methods: Search engines, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane, were applied to identify clinical investigations into the potential benefits of PBMTs in orthodontic management. Keywords used were "low-level laser therapy," "low-level light therapy," "photobiomodulation," "orthodontics," "pain," "tooth movement," and "randomized clinical trial ≥5 years." A total of 35 articles were identified, covering the 5-year period January 2013 to December 2018. Only human clinical trials were considered. Seventeen articles were included in this investigation and the reported parameters and outcomes were assessed and presented for comparison. Results: Seven of nine studies supported the effectiveness of PBMT to reduce or prevent pain. There was no consensus on choice of wavelength and a range of parameters were found beneficial. Of the seven tooth movement studies included, four of the seven were positive, of which two used a home-use light-emitting diode (LED) device, as opposed to a clinician-applied laser. A variety of wavelengths and parameters were found to be effective in accelerating tooth movement in the range of 20-40% compared with control. Conclusions: Due to a lack of consistency in approach, further studies are required to achieve a high level of acceptance. The clinical logistics associated with frequent applications supports the concept of patient home delivery use of LED devices, although there are insufficient studies at present to make an evidence-based determination of this type of appliance. To gain more general professional acceptance of the use of PBMT in orthodontics, a continued effort to extend the number of quality human clinical trials is required. Based on the current evidence base, further positive onward progression can be regarded as inevitable.
Objective: This systematic review of published research evaluates the parameters and reported outcomes in photobiomodulation therapies (PBMTs) used in management of pain and accelerated tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. Background: Consequent to positive in vitro and animal studies, there has been considerable interest in the potential applications of PBMT to ameliorate pain and to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement. Due to the lack of consistency of wavelengths and parameters applied, there is as yet no consensus in respect of guidance for clinical use. Within the limitations of the reported literature, a digest of key outcomes and parameters is presented here to assist researchers and interested clinicians. Materials and methods: Search engines, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane, were applied to identify clinical investigations into the potential benefits of PBMTs in orthodontic management. Keywords used were "low-level laser therapy," "low-level light therapy," "photobiomodulation," "orthodontics," "pain," "tooth movement," and "randomized clinical trial ≥5 years." A total of 35 articles were identified, covering the 5-year period January 2013 to December 2018. Only human clinical trials were considered. Seventeen articles were included in this investigation and the reported parameters and outcomes were assessed and presented for comparison. Results: Seven of nine studies supported the effectiveness of PBMT to reduce or prevent pain. There was no consensus on choice of wavelength and a range of parameters were found beneficial. Of the seven tooth movement studies included, four of the seven were positive, of which two used a home-use light-emitting diode (LED) device, as opposed to a clinician-applied laser. A variety of wavelengths and parameters were found to be effective in accelerating tooth movement in the range of 20-40% compared with control. Conclusions: Due to a lack of consistency in approach, further studies are required to achieve a high level of acceptance. The clinical logistics associated with frequent applications supports the concept of patient home delivery use of LED devices, although there are insufficient studies at present to make an evidence-based determination of this type of appliance. To gain more general professional acceptance of the use of PBMT in orthodontics, a continued effort to extend the number of quality human clinical trials is required. Based on the current evidence base, further positive onward progression can be regarded as inevitable.
Authors: Mohamed Abdulkarim Khwanda; Ahmad S Burhan; Mohammad Y Hajeer; Mowaffak A Ajaj; Steven Parker; Fehmieh R Nawaya; Omar Hamadah Journal: Cureus Date: 2022-06-13
Authors: Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Marina Vitale; Antonio Luiz Barbosa Pinheiro; Paola Gandini; Lorenzo Sorrentino; Ugo Matteo Iarussi; Andrea Scribante Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Marcin Olek; Agnieszka Machorowska-Pieniążek; Wojciech Stós; Janusz Kalukin; Dorota Bartusik-Aebisher; David Aebisher; Grzegorz Cieślar; Aleksandra Kawczyk-Krupka Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 6.321