Literature DB >> 31755626

Urbanization drives cross-taxon declines in abundance and diversity at multiple spatial scales.

Elena Piano1,2, Caroline Souffreau3, Thomas Merckx4,5, Lisa F Baardsen6, Thierry Backeljau1,6, Dries Bonte7, Kristien I Brans3, Marie Cours8, Maxime Dahirel7,9, Nicolas Debortoli10, Ellen Decaestecker11, Katrien De Wolf1,12, Jessie M T Engelen3, Diego Fontaneto13, Andros T Gianuca3,14, Lynn Govaert3,15,16, Fabio T T Hanashiro3, Janet Higuti17, Luc Lens7, Koen Martens8,18, Hans Matheve7, Erik Matthysen6, Eveline Pinseel19,20, Rose Sablon1, Isa Schön8,21, Robby Stoks22, Karine Van Doninck10, Hans Van Dyck4, Pieter Vanormelingen19, Jeroen Van Wichelen19,23, Wim Vyverman19, Luc De Meester3, Frederik Hendrickx1,7.   

Abstract

The increasing urbanization process is hypothesized to drastically alter (semi-)natural environments with a concomitant major decline in species abundance and diversity. Yet, studies on this effect of urbanization, and the spatial scale at which it acts, are at present inconclusive due to the large heterogeneity in taxonomic groups and spatial scales at which this relationship has been investigated among studies. Comprehensive studies analysing this relationship across multiple animal groups and at multiple spatial scales are rare, hampering the assessment of how biodiversity generally responds to urbanization. We studied aquatic (cladocerans), limno-terrestrial (bdelloid rotifers) and terrestrial (butterflies, ground beetles, ground- and web spiders, macro-moths, orthopterans and snails) invertebrate groups using a hierarchical spatial design, wherein three local-scale (200 m × 200 m) urbanization levels were repeatedly sampled across three landscape-scale (3 km × 3 km) urbanization levels. We tested for local and landscape urbanization effects on abundance and species richness of each group, whereby total richness was partitioned into the average richness of local communities and the richness due to variation among local communities. Abundances of the terrestrial active dispersers declined in response to local urbanization, with reductions up to 85% for butterflies, while passive dispersers did not show any clear trend. Species richness also declined with increasing levels of urbanization, but responses were highly heterogeneous among the different groups with respect to the richness component and the spatial scale at which urbanization impacts richness. Depending on the group, species richness declined due to biotic homogenization and/or local species loss. This resulted in an overall decrease in total richness across groups in urban areas. These results provide strong support to the general negative impact of urbanization on abundance and species richness within habitat patches and highlight the importance of considering multiple spatial scales and taxa to assess the impacts of urbanization on biodiversity.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biodiversity; biotic homogenization; diversity partitioning; insect decline; land use; spatial scale; urban ecology

Year:  2020        PMID: 31755626     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  11 in total

1.  Insect decline in the Anthropocene: Death by a thousand cuts.

Authors:  David L Wagner; Eliza M Grames; Matthew L Forister; May R Berenbaum; David Stopak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  A butterfly flaps its wings: Extinction of biological experience and the origins of allergy.

Authors:  Susan L Prescott
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 6.347

Review 3.  Supporting Bees in Cities: How Bees Are Influenced by Local and Landscape Features.

Authors:  Anthony C Ayers; Sandra M Rehan
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.769

4.  Functional diversity and habitat preferences of native grassland plants and ground-dwelling invertebrates in private gardens along an urbanization gradient.

Authors:  Brigitte Braschler; José D Gilgado; Hans-Peter Rusterholz; Sascha Buchholz; Valerie Zwahlen; Bruno Baur
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Environmental DNA captures native and non-native fish community variations across the lentic and lotic systems of a megacity.

Authors:  Shan Zhang; Yitao Zheng; Aibin Zhan; Chunxia Dong; Jindong Zhao; Meng Yao
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Great tits feed their nestlings with more but smaller prey items and fewer caterpillars in cities than in forests.

Authors:  Csenge Sinkovics; Gábor Seress; Ivett Pipoly; Ernő Vincze; András Liker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Urban warming and artificial light alter dormancy in the flesh fly.

Authors:  Ayumu Mukai; Koki Yamaguchi; Shin G Goto
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Human-Wildlife Conflicts in Krakow City, Southern Poland.

Authors:  Sayantani M Basak; Izabela A Wierzbowska; Agnieszka Gajda; Marcin Czarnoleski; Maciej Lesiak; Elzbieta Widera
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Urbanization extends flight phenology and leads to local adaptation of seasonal plasticity in Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Thomas Merckx; Matthew E Nielsen; Janne Heliölä; Mikko Kuussaari; Lars B Pettersson; Juha Pöyry; Juha Tiainen; Karl Gotthard; Sami M Kivelä
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Landscape context and substrate characteristics shape fungal communities of dead spruce in urban and semi-natural forests.

Authors:  Aku Korhonen; Otto Miettinen; Johan D Kotze; Leena Hamberg
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.