C Rolli Salathé1, W Kälin2,3, S Zilse2, A Elfering2,3. 1. Department of Psychology, Institute for Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012, Bern, Switzerland. cornelia.rolli@psy.unibe.ch. 2. Department of Psychology, Institute for Psychology, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012, Bern, Switzerland. 3. National Centre of Competence in Research, Affective Sciences, CISA, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This longitudinal study followed 10- to 13-year-old adolescents for 5 years to investigate the effects of juvenile musculoskeletal (MSK) pain and psychosocial risk factors on future pain. We further predicted that increased MSK pain at follow-up would be positively related to current school pressure at follow-up and negatively related to current sleep quality. Sleep quality was tested as a potential mediator of the link between school pressure and MSK pain at follow-up after controlling for baseline MSK pain. METHODS: The baseline sample comprised 189 adolescents, and 5-year follow-up resulted in 107 15- to 18-year-old adolescents who had completed mandatory education. Adolescents responded to an online questionnaire about psychosocial stressors, MSK pain, school achievement and leisure activities. A longitudinal hierarchic linear regression including all significant baseline predictors was run to assess their impact on MSK pain 5 years later. Mediation analysis was used to investigate sleep quality as a potential mediator of the relationship between school pressure and MSK pain at follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline MSK pain predicted MSK pain over a time lag of 5 years (ß = .26, p = .02). The relationship between follow-up school pressure and current MSK pain was mediated by sleep quality at follow-up (B = .17, SEB = .07, 95% CI .06-.34) when baseline MSK pain was controlled. CONCLUSIONS: Juvenile MSK pain predicts MSK pain in adolescence. A psychosocial mediation model including school pressure and sleep impairments has the potential to explain MSK pain mechanisms in adolescents. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
PURPOSE: This longitudinal study followed 10- to 13-year-old adolescents for 5 years to investigate the effects of juvenile musculoskeletal (MSK) pain and psychosocial risk factors on future pain. We further predicted that increased MSK pain at follow-up would be positively related to current school pressure at follow-up and negatively related to current sleep quality. Sleep quality was tested as a potential mediator of the link between school pressure and MSK pain at follow-up after controlling for baseline MSK pain. METHODS: The baseline sample comprised 189 adolescents, and 5-year follow-up resulted in 107 15- to 18-year-old adolescents who had completed mandatory education. Adolescents responded to an online questionnaire about psychosocial stressors, MSK pain, school achievement and leisure activities. A longitudinal hierarchic linear regression including all significant baseline predictors was run to assess their impact on MSK pain 5 years later. Mediation analysis was used to investigate sleep quality as a potential mediator of the relationship between school pressure and MSK pain at follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline MSK pain predicted MSK pain over a time lag of 5 years (ß = .26, p = .02). The relationship between follow-up school pressure and current MSK pain was mediated by sleep quality at follow-up (B = .17, SEB = .07, 95% CI .06-.34) when baseline MSK pain was controlled. CONCLUSIONS: Juvenile MSK pain predicts MSK pain in adolescence. A psychosocial mediation model including school pressure and sleep impairments has the potential to explain MSK pain mechanisms in adolescents. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Authors: Thomas Andersen; Finn B Christensen; Kristian W Høy; Peter Helmig; Bent Niedermann; Ebbe S Hansen; Cody Bünger Journal: Spine J Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Anna Huguet; Michelle E Tougas; Jill Hayden; Patrick J McGrath; Jennifer N Stinson; Christine T Chambers Journal: Pain Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Juha P Auvinen; Tuija H Tammelin; Simo P Taimela; Paavo J Zitting; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Anja M Taanila; Jaro I Karppinen Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2009-11-20 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Maria Wiklund; Eva-Britt Malmgren-Olsson; Ann Ohman; Erik Bergström; Anncristine Fjellman-Wiklund Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-11-16 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Steve J Kamper; Nicholas Henschke; Lise Hestbaek; Kate M Dunn; Christopher M Williams Journal: Braz J Phys Ther Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 3.377