Literature DB >> 31754780

Will the EU stay out of step with science and the rest of the world on plant breeding innovation?

Petra Jorasch1.   

Abstract

Innovations in plant breeding like genome editing methods raised questions about the adequacy of established regulatory policies for plant breeding and biotechnology in view of these new breeding methods and the resulting products. Most countries follow the principle approach that only those plants will be regulated under biotech regulations that include a novel combination of genetic material following the Cartagena protocol. In contrast to this, the European Court of Justice interpreted the current EU biotech regulations in a way that these also apply to plants resulting from new mutagenesis breeding, even if these plants are indistinguishable from conventionally bred plants. This ruling created strong reactions and concerns stating that recent technical developments have made the EU GMO Directive no longer fit for purpose. The article describes ongoing policy developments on EU level that might result in an update of current regulations.

Keywords:  Crispr; GMO; Genome editing; Mutagenesis; Plant breeding

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31754780     DOI: 10.1007/s00299-019-02482-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Rep        ISSN: 0721-7714            Impact factor:   4.570


  4 in total

1.  Regulatory aspects of gene editing in Argentina.

Authors:  Martin Alfredo Lema
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  The global need for plant breeding innovation.

Authors:  Petra Jorasch
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  A novel governance framework for GMO: A tiered, more flexible regulation for GMOs would help to stimulate innovation and public debate.

Authors:  Sigrid Bratlie; Kristin Halvorsen; Bjørn K Myskja; Hilde Mellegård; Cathrine Bjorvatn; Petter Frost; Gunnar Heiene; Bjørn Hofmann; Arne Holst-Jensen; Torolf Holst-Larsen; Raino Se Malnes; Benedicte Paus; Bente Sandvig; Sonja Irene Sjøli; Birgit Skarstein; May B Thorseth; Nils Vagstad; Dag Inge Våge; Ole J Borge
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Russia joins in global gene-editing bonanza.

Authors:  Olga Dobrovidova
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 49.962

  4 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Genome editing and beyond: what does it mean for the future of plant breeding?

Authors:  Tien Van Vu; Swati Das; Goetz Hensel; Jae-Yean Kim
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.540

Review 2.  Gene Editing Regulation and Innovation Economics.

Authors:  Agustina I Whelan; Patricia Gutti; Martin A Lema
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-15

Review 3.  Global Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops Amid the Gene Edited Crop Boom - A Review.

Authors:  Crystal Turnbull; Morten Lillemo; Trine A K Hvoslef-Eide
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Vision, challenges and opportunities for a Plant Cell Atlas.

Authors:  Suryatapa Ghosh Jha; Alexander T Borowsky; Benjamin J Cole; Noah Fahlgren; Andrew Farmer; Shao-Shan Carol Huang; Purva Karia; Marc Libault; Nicholas J Provart; Selena L Rice; Maite Saura-Sanchez; Pinky Agarwal; Amir H Ahkami; Christopher R Anderton; Steven P Briggs; Jennifer An Brophy; Peter Denolf; Luigi F Di Costanzo; Moises Exposito-Alonso; Stefania Giacomello; Fabio Gomez-Cano; Kerstin Kaufmann; Dae Kwan Ko; Sagar Kumar; Andrey V Malkovskiy; Naomi Nakayama; Toshihiro Obata; Marisa S Otegui; Gergo Palfalvi; Elsa H Quezada-Rodríguez; Rajveer Singh; R Glen Uhrig; Jamie Waese; Klaas Van Wijk; R Clay Wright; David W Ehrhardt; Kenneth D Birnbaum; Seung Y Rhee
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 8.140

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.