| Literature DB >> 31754380 |
Jianzhi Zhu1,2, Zhicong Li3, Changchang Zhang2, Lizhou Lin4, Shoupeng Cao1, Hailong Che1, Xiangyang Shi2, Han Wang3, Jan C M van Hest1.
Abstract
Constructing nanosystems that synergistically combine therapeutic and diagnostic features is of great interest to the nanomedicine community but also remains a tremendous challenge.Entities:
Keywords: Catalase; chemotherapy.; pH-sensitive PEGylation; polymer shell; ultrasound-guided focused ultrasound ablation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31754380 PMCID: PMC6857069 DOI: 10.7150/thno.37054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Scheme 1(A) Synthetic route for the preparation of PEGylated nCAT. (B) Schematic illustration of the use of PEGylated nCAT for combined US-guided FUS ablation and hypoxia-relieved chemotherapy.
Figure 1(A) Hydrodynamic size distribution of native CAT, nCAT and PEGylated nCAT at two different pH values. (B) SEM image of PEGylated nCAT. (C) TEM image of PEGylated nCAT stained with phosphotungstic acid. (D) Relative enzyme activity of native CAT, acrylated CAT, nCAT and PEGylated nCAT at pH 7.4 and 6.5. (E) Oxygen generation in H2O2 solutions (500 µM) incubated with native CAT, PEGylated nBSA and PEGylated nCAT at pH 7.4 and 6.5. (F) Photographs of O2 bubble generation in H2O2 solutions treated with native CAT, PEGylated nBSA and PEGylated nCAT. (G) Relative enzyme activity of native and PEGylated nCAT at different time points after incubation at 50 oC. (H) Cell viabilities of NIH 3T3 and 4T1 cells treated with PEGylated nCAT at different concentrations for 24 h using CCK-8 assays. (I) Cell viabilities of 4T1 cells incubated with DOX at different concentrations under hypoxic and normoxic culture conditions for 24 h using CCK-8 assays.
Figure 2(A) Fluorescent images of 4T1 cells incubated under different treatment conditions. Calcein-AM and PI were employed to stain the living and dead cells, respectively. Scale bar: 100 µm. (B) CLSM images of 4T1 cells incubated with fluorescent PEGylated nCAT at pH 7.4 and pH 6.5 for 4 h. The nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342. Scale bar: 50 µm. (C) FACS results of the uptake of PEGylated nCAT in 4T1 cells incubated at pH 7.4 and pH 6.5. PEGylated nCAT was labeled with Cy5. (D) FACS results of DOX uptake of 4T1 cells incubated with DOX (2 µg/mL) in the absence (hypoxia) or presence (normoxia) of PEGylated nCAT.
Figure 3(A) Pseudo-colored in vivo photoacoustic imaging of 4T1 tumors before and after intratumoral injection of the PEGylated nCAT (20 µL, 1 mg/mL). (B) IVIS images of 4T1 tumor bearing nude mice at different time intervals after intravenous injection of fluorescent nCAT and PEGylated nCAT (200 µL, 1 mg/mL). (C) The normalized body fluorescent intensity of 4T1 tumor bearing nude mice at different time intervals after intravenous injection of nCAT and PEGylated nCAT (200 µL, 1 mg/mL). (D) In vivo US imaging of 4T1 tumors before and after intratumoral injection of the PEGylated nCAT (20 µL, 1 mg/mL) at different time intervals. (E) In vivo US imaging of 4T1 tumors before and after intravenous injection of native CAT and the PEGylated nCAT (200 µL, 1 mg/mL) at different time intervals.
Figure 4(A) Photograph of tumors after the in vivo therapy. The dosage of DOX and PEGylated nCAT is 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, respectively. FUS was conducted with the settings of 1.5 W/cm2 and 50% duty circle for 3 min. (B) Tumor growth curves after the different treatments. Tumor volumes (V) were normalized to their initial values (V0). (C) Mice body weight changes of different groups over 12 d. (D) Immunofluorescence staining images of tumor slices after different treatments for 48 h. The cell nuclei and hypoxia areas were stained by DAPI (blue) and antipimonidazole antibody (green), respectively. (E) H&E staining of tumor slices taken at day 12 after different treatments.