| Literature DB >> 31754323 |
Anna A Bannikova1, Paulina D Jenkins1, Evgeniya N Solovyeva2, Svetlana V Pavlova3, Tatiana B Demidova3, Sergey A Simanovsky3, Boris I Sheftel3, Vladimir S Lebedev2, Yun Fang4, Love Dalen5, Alexei V Abramov6.
Abstract
The first genetic study of the holotype of the Gansu short-tailed shrew, Blarinella griselda Thomas, 1912, is presented. The mitochondrial analysis demonstrated that the type specimen of B. griselda is close to several recently collected specimens from southern Gansu, northern Sichuan and Shaanxi, which are highly distinct from the two species of Asiatic short-tailed shrews of southern Sichuan, Yunnan, and Vietnam, B. quadraticauda and B. wardi. Our analysis of four nuclear genes supported the placement of B. griselda as sister to B. quadraticauda / B. wardi, with the level of divergence between these two clades corresponding to that among genera of Soricinae. A new generic name, Parablarinella, is proposed for the Gansu short-tailed shrew. Karyotypes of Parablarinella griselda (2n = 49, NFa = 50) and B. quadraticauda (2n = 49, NFa = 62) from southern Gansu are described. The tribal affinities of Blarinellini and Blarinini are discussed. Anna A. Bannikova, Paulina D. Jenkins, Evgeniya N. Solovyeva, Svetlana V. Pavlova, Tatiana B. Demidova, Sergey A. Simanovsky, Boris I. Sheftel, Vladimir S. Lebedev, Yun Fang, Love Dalen, Alexei V. Abramov.Entities:
Keywords: Blarinellini ; Blarinini ; Parablarinella ; karyotypic variation; molecular phylogeny
Year: 2019 PMID: 31754323 PMCID: PMC6861342 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.888.37982
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zookeys ISSN: 1313-2970 Impact factor: 1.546
List of the original material used in the molecular study and specimens examined in the morphological analysis: species, specimen ID, collection and geographic origin. Samples are stored in the following collections: ZMMU – Zoological Museum of Moscow State University, Russia; ZIN – Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, St.-Petersburg, Russia; NHMUK – Natural History Museum, London, UK. All specimens in the phylogenetic analysis were also included in the morphological analysis, with the exception of those marked thus – #.
|
|
|
|
|
| “ |
| China, Gansu, 68 km SE Taochou (Lintan), Tsingling (Qinling) Mountains, | |
| Chi111 | China, S. Gansu, Taizishan NR, | ||
| China, S. Gansu, Taizishan NR, | |||
| G17-87 | China, N. Sichuan, Ruoergai (Zoige), | ||
| G18-252 | China, N. Sichuan, Songpan, | ||
|
| Bl-1 | Vietnam, Lao Cai, Van Ban, | |
| Bl-2 | Vietnam, Lao Cai, Sa Pa, | ||
| Bl-3 | Vietnam, Lao Cai, Sa Pa, | ||
| Vietnam, Lao Cai, Sa Pa, | |||
| Vietnam, Lao Cai, Sa Pa, | |||
| Bl-5 | Vietnam, Lao Cai, Sa Pa, | ||
| V12-40 | Vietnam, Lao Cai, Sa Pa, | ||
| V12-61 | Vietnam, Lao Cai, Sa Pa, | ||
|
| G17-12 | China, S. Gansu, Huixian, | |
|
| China, S. Sichuan, Omi-San (Emei Shan), | ||
| China, S. Sichuan, Omi-San (Emei Shan), | |||
| China, S. Sichuan, Omi-San (Emei Shan), | |||
| China, S. Sichuan, Omi-San (Emei Shan), | |||
| China, S. Sichuan, Nan-chwan (Nanchuan), | |||
|
| China, Yunnan, Hpimaw, {formerly Upper Burma / Myanmar} (Pianma), 26°N, 98°35’E ( | ||
| Myanmar, Adung Valley, | |||
| China, Yunnan, Mekong – Salwin (Salween) Divide, 28°N (c. | |||
| China, Yunnan, Kiu-Kiang – Salwin Divide, 28°N (c. | |||
|
| Chi11-72 | China, S. Gansu, Lianhuashan NR, | |
| G17-13 | China, S. Gansu, Huixian, |
Figure 2.The phylogenetic relationships in as reconstructed in MrBayes based on cytb data. Numbers above or below branches correspond to Bayesian posterior probabilities and ML bootstrap values (>50%) generated using fast bootstrap algorithm in IQTREE. The genera and are used as outgroups.
Figure 3.MrBayes tree of genera as inferred from the concatenation of four nuclear genes. Numbers above or below branches correspond to Bayesian posterior probabilities and ML bootstrap values (>50%) generated using fast bootstrap algorithm in IQTREE. is used as outgroup.
Approximate node age estimates (My) in based on nuclear data.
|
|
|
|
| 12.39 | 9.29–15.93 | |
| Tmrca | 5.99 | 3.81–8.12 |
| Tmrca | 9.61 | 6.87–12.74 |
| Tmrca | 1.68 | 0.71–3.25 |
| Tmrca | 1.11 | 0.71–3.25 |
| Tmrca | 0.45 | 0.16–0.89 |
Comparison of dental and cranial morphology of , and .
|
|
|
|
|
| I1 angle of principal to posterior cusp | Moderately shallow > 90° | Moderately acute, approaching or < 90° | Moderately acute |
| Relative size of unicuspids (Fig. | Un1>Un2>Un3>>Un4>Un5 | Un1>Un2>>Un3>>Un4>Un5 or Un1>Un2>>Un3>>Un4>>Un5 | Un1>Un2>>Un3>>Un4>Un5 or Un1>Un2>>Un3>>Un4sub=Un |
| Size of Un3 | Un3 smaller than Un2 | Un3 markedly smaller than Un2 | Un3 markedly smaller than Un2 |
| Height c. 0.6 – 0.75, volume c 0.7 – 0.75 of Un2 | Height c 0.45 – 0.6, volume c 0.5 – 0.6 of Un2 | Height 0.5 – 0.6, volume 0.5 – 0.6 of Un2 | |
| Size of Un4 | Height c 0.4 – 0.45, volume c 0.33 – 0.6 of Un3 | Height c 0.5 – 0.75, volume c 0.5 – 0.75of Un3. | Height c 0.6, volume c 0.5 – 0.75 of Un3. |
| P4 shape | Lingual margin of tooth curved. Ratio of anterior to posterior width moderate, tooth noticeably broader posteriorly than anteriorly. Hypocone absent; narrow trough between anterior of cingulum and protocone. Lingual cingulum forms a shallow semi-circle; postero-lingual margin projects beyond antero-lingual border of M1. | Lingual margin of tooth sub-angular. Ratio of anterior to posterior width relatively low, tooth quadrangular in shape. Hypocone low but distinct, broad trough between hypocone and protocone. Lingual cingulum shallowly curved, postero-lingual margin more or less in line with antero-lingual border of M1. | Lingual margin of tooth shallowly curved. Ratio of anterior to posterior width slightly greater than that of |
| Number cuspids on i1 posterior to principal cusp in unworn dentition | Bicuspid. | Tricuspid. | Tricuspid, one specimen bicuspid. |
| Talonid of m1 and m2 (Fig. | Talonid complete: low distinct mesoconid with oblique crest to hypoconid; low distinct hypoconulid; separate, distinct entoconid with a very low indistinct entoconid crest, scarcely linking to the metaconid. | Talonid with indistinct mesoconid as oblique crest to hypoconid, low hypoconulid, low but distinct entoconid linked by entoconid crest to metaconid. Entoconid in usually more evident on m1 than m2. | Talonid reduced: low mesoconid with low oblique crest to hypoconid, low but distinct hypoconulid but entoconid absent with a low indistinct trace of entoconid crest. |
| Talonid of m3 (Fig. | Talonid incomplete: small but distinct mesoconid with oblique crest to hypoconid. | Talonid incomplete: elements comprise oblique crest to hypoconid. | Talonid incomplete: trace of mesoconid as oblique crest to low hypoconid. |
| Position of Foramen Ovale on Inferior Articular Facet (Fig. | Central. Opens onto the inferior articular facet with a shallow depression towards the anterior. | Anterior. Opens anteriorly into the orbital region; antero-lateral roof formed by the pterygoid. | Anterior. Opens anteriorly into the orbital region; antero-lateral roof formed by the pterygoid. |
| Small foramen on rostrum anterior to infraorbital canal | Above P4, posterior to rostral fossa, within depression leading to infraorbital canal. One specimen with an additional foramen in the antorbital fossa above the junction of Un2 and Un3. | In rostral fossa above junction of P4 and Un4. | In rostral fossa above junction of P4 and Un4. |
| Extent of reticulation area of the wall of the mesopterygoid fossa | Extends to the base of the mesopterygoid fossa at the level of the hamular processes of the pterygoids and extends posteriorly well beyond hamular processes and close to the level of the vidian foramina. | Area of reticulation smaller than in | Area of reticulation not extending to the base of the mesopterygoid fossa, nor extending posteriorly far beyond the level of the hamular processes and far short of the vidian foramina |
| Mandibular Foramen (MF) opens posteriorly leads anteriorly into the mandibular corpus and is ventral to the Ramal Foramen (RF) which opens dorsally into the postero-internal ramal fossa (or temporal fossa) (Fig. | Mandibular foramen well separated from ramal foramen and clearly visible in lingual view. Ramal foramen posterodorsally positioned, largely concealed within the ventral border of the temporal fossa, not or barely visible in lingual view. | Mandibular foramen and ramal foramen occupy a shared fossa. Mandibular foramen not or barely visible in lingual view. Ramal foramen large and clearly visible in lateral view. | Mandibular foramen and ramal foramen in shared fossa but well separated. Ramal foramen small, posterodorsally positioned and visible in lingual view. |
| Coronoid spicule on buccal face of coronoid process | Prominent, projects posteriorly. | Moderately prominent not projecting far posteriorly. | Stout, not very prominent. |
Figure 4.Skulls from left to right of the holotype of NHMUK 1912.8.5.23; NHMUK 1911.2.1.59; the holotype of NHMUK 1915.2.1.3 (please note that the number written incorrectly as 12.2.1.3 on the skull of this species should read 15.2.1.3). Top row: dorsal view; middle row: ventral view; lower row: left lateral view.
Figure 6.Comparison of lingual view of posterior region of right mandible to show variation in mandibular and ramal foramina. Mandibular foramen: horizontal arrow; ramal foramen: vertical arrow. From left to right: holotype of NHMUK 1912.8.5.23; NHMUK 1911.2.1.59; holotype of NHMUK 1915.2.3. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 7.The female karyotype of (G17-12) with 2n = 49, NFa = 62: routine Giemsa staining (A) and CBG-banding (B).
Figure 8.The male karyotype of (ZMMU S-195179) with 2n = 49; NFa = 50.
Figure 1.Sample localities of specimens used for molecular analyses 1 China, Gansu, Lingtan County (NHMUK 12.8.5.23, holotype of Thomas, 1912) 2 China, Gansu, Taizishan NR (ZMMU S-195179) 3 China, Sichuan, Ruoergai (Zoige) (ZMMU G17-87) 4 China, Sichuan, Songpan (ZMMU G18-252) 5 China, Shaanxi, Mt.Qinling (after He et al. 2018) 6 China, Gansu, Huixian (ZMMU G17-12) 7 China, Sichuan, Baoxing (type locality of (Milne-Edwards, 1872)). Unnumbered localities based on the GenBank data.
Compilation of characters used by Reumer (1998) for definition of the tribes and . Distinctive characters are indicated by bold typeface.
|
|
|
| Horizontal ramus of mandible short and high, making the lower dentition compressed anteroposteriorly and giving the lophs and lophids a compressed W-shaped appearance# | Lower molars W-shaped* |
| Mandible with a broad interarticular area# | Mandible with a broad interarticular area# |
| Mandibular condyle with its articular facets separated* | Mandibular condyle with its articular facets separated# |
| Coronoid spicule well developed# | Coronoid spicule present* |
| Internal temporal fossa of moderate size* | Internal temporal fossa of moderate size# |
|
| |
| M3 with a reduced talonid# | M3 with a reduced talonid* |
| Teeth heavily pigmented# | Pigmented# |
| Upper incisor protruding but not fissident# | Upper incisor not fissident# |
| Upper molariform teeth with a reduced posterior emargination, showing a tendency to develop a continuous endoloph# | Slight emargination* |
| Occlusal surface of M1 nearly square# | Variable sub-square or oblong* |
# Characters specified by Reumer (1998) * Character state not mentioned in Reumer (1998) but observed in specimens of and in this study