Elena Byhoff1, Lauren A Taylor2. 1. Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: ebyhoff@tuftsmedicalcenter.org. 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study is to investigate how community-based organizations perceive Medicaid policy changes to address the social determinants of health. METHODS: This study included 46 key informant interviews, representing 44 community-based organizations across Massachusetts conducted from September 2017 to March 2018. The interviews were designed to collect community-based organizations' perceptions of Medicaid policy changes. An Advisory Board was empaneled for feedback on data collection and analysis. Massachusetts was chosen as a study site in light of explicit policy efforts to incentivize healthcare organizations to take a more active role in social determinants of health, most notably through the creation of Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations. RESULTS: The community-based organizations expressed optimism about future partnerships with healthcare organizations. This optimism existed alongside the recognition that healthcare organizations and community-based organizations can have conflicting agendas, including misaligned outcomes of interest and timelines. Community-based organizations struggled to define a clear strategy for partnership in the face of incomplete information about how the final Medicaid redesign would proceed and what healthcare providers would be looking for in a partner. CONCLUSIONS: Changes to Medicaid policy can catalyze interest in partnership between healthcare organizations and community-based organizations. To minimize the impact of conflicting agendas, policymakers and healthcare leadership should ensure community-based organizations are part of strategy development and social service program implementation. SUPPLEMENT INFORMATION: This article is part of a supplement entitled Identifying and Intervening on Social Needs in Clinical Settings: Evidence and Evidence Gaps, which is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Kaiser Permanente, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study is to investigate how community-based organizations perceive Medicaid policy changes to address the social determinants of health. METHODS: This study included 46 key informant interviews, representing 44 community-based organizations across Massachusetts conducted from September 2017 to March 2018. The interviews were designed to collect community-based organizations' perceptions of Medicaid policy changes. An Advisory Board was empaneled for feedback on data collection and analysis. Massachusetts was chosen as a study site in light of explicit policy efforts to incentivize healthcare organizations to take a more active role in social determinants of health, most notably through the creation of Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations. RESULTS: The community-based organizations expressed optimism about future partnerships with healthcare organizations. This optimism existed alongside the recognition that healthcare organizations and community-based organizations can have conflicting agendas, including misaligned outcomes of interest and timelines. Community-based organizations struggled to define a clear strategy for partnership in the face of incomplete information about how the final Medicaid redesign would proceed and what healthcare providers would be looking for in a partner. CONCLUSIONS: Changes to Medicaid policy can catalyze interest in partnership between healthcare organizations and community-based organizations. To minimize the impact of conflicting agendas, policymakers and healthcare leadership should ensure community-based organizations are part of strategy development and social service program implementation. SUPPLEMENT INFORMATION: This article is part of a supplement entitled Identifying and Intervening on Social Needs in Clinical Settings: Evidence and Evidence Gaps, which is sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Kaiser Permanente, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Authors: Valerie A Lewis; Thomas D'Aunno; Genevra F Murray; Stephen M Shortell; Carrie H Colla Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Arlene S Ash; Eric O Mick; Randall P Ellis; Catarina I Kiefe; Jeroan J Allison; Melissa A Clark Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Seth A Berkowitz; Jean Terranova; Caterina Hill; Toyin Ajayi; Todd Linsky; Lori W Tishler; Darren A DeWalt Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Mary E Larimer; Daniel K Malone; Michelle D Garner; David C Atkins; Bonnie Burlingham; Heather S Lonczak; Kenneth Tanzer; Joshua Ginzler; Seema L Clifasefi; William G Hobson; G Alan Marlatt Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Etsemaye P Agonafer; Savanna L Carson; Vanessa Nunez; Kelli Poole; Clemens S Hong; Maria Morales; Jessica Jara; Sarmen Hakopian; Tiffany Kenison; Ish Bhalla; Francesca Cameron; Stefanie D Vassar; Arleen F Brown Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-03-06 Impact factor: 3.295