Emma Poon1. 1. Clinical Education Development and Research (CEDAR) Group, Psychology: College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Abstract
Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the effectiveness of psychological interventions that involve people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and their informal caregivers, and target improvements in the management of the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD); quality of life; and/or burden reduction for people with either dementia or MCI and their informal caregivers. Methods: Studies were identified through database searches (Cochrane Library, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsychINFO) and clinical trials registers (ClinicalTrials.gov and http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/). Data were pooled for meta-analysis. Results: Database and reference list searches identified 1,878 references, of which fourteen studies were included. Positive effects were found on the anxiety symptoms of people with dementia on the RAID scale; on the quality of life of people with dementia on the self-rated QoL-AD scale; and on informal caregiver burden on the Zarit Burden Interview.Conclusions: Psychological interventions involving whole dyads have some promise for both people with dementia and informal caregivers, but are still far from uniformly effective across BPSD, quality of life, and caregiver burden. Further research directions are discussed.Clinical Implications: The results suggest that clinicians should routinely involve both halves of the dyad when delivering psychological interventions targeting anxiety or quality of life for people with dementia, or burden for informal caregivers.
Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the effectiveness of psychological interventions that involve people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and their informal caregivers, and target improvements in the management of the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD); quality of life; and/or burden reduction for people with either dementia or MCI and their informal caregivers. Methods: Studies were identified through database searches (Cochrane Library, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsychINFO) and clinical trials registers (ClinicalTrials.gov and http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/). Data were pooled for meta-analysis. Results: Database and reference list searches identified 1,878 references, of which fourteen studies were included. Positive effects were found on the anxiety symptoms of people with dementia on the RAID scale; on the quality of life of people with dementia on the self-rated QoL-AD scale; and on informal caregiver burden on the Zarit Burden Interview.Conclusions: Psychological interventions involving whole dyads have some promise for both people with dementia and informal caregivers, but are still far from uniformly effective across BPSD, quality of life, and caregiver burden. Further research directions are discussed.Clinical Implications: The results suggest that clinicians should routinely involve both halves of the dyad when delivering psychological interventions targeting anxiety or quality of life for people with dementia, or burden for informal caregivers.
Authors: Sarah M Bannon; Mira Reichman; Paula Popok; Victoria A Grunberg; Lara Traeger; Melissa V Gates; Erin A Krahn; Katherine Brandt; Megan Quimby; Bonnie Wong; Bradford C Dickerson; Ana-Maria Vranceanu Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2022-02-09
Authors: Eleni Poptsi; Magda Tsolaki; Sverre Bergh; Bruno Mario Cesana; Alfonso Ciccone; Andrea Fabbo; Giovanni B Frisoni; Lutz Frölich; Sara Lavolpe; Anna Giulia Guazzarini; Jacques Hugon; Sara Fascendini; Carlo Alberto Defanti Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Patrick Pui Kin Kor; Clare Tsz Kiu Yu; Justina Yat Wa Liu; Daphne Sze Ki Cheung; Rick Yiu Cho Kwan; Angela Yee Man Leung; Denise Pik Mei Liu; Joan Mo King Hon Journal: Int J Older People Nurs Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 2.471