| Literature DB >> 31751856 |
Margaret L Westwater1, Raquel Vilar-López2, Hisham Ziauddeen3, Antonio Verdejo-García4, Paul C Fletcher3.
Abstract
Overweight and obesity are associated with functional and structural alterations in the brain, but how these associations change across critical developmental periods remains unknown. Here, we examined the relationship between age, body mass index (BMI) and cortical thickness (CT) in healthy adolescents (n = 70; 14-19 y) and adults (n = 75; 25-45 y). We also examined the relationship between adiposity, impulsivity, measured by delay discounting (DD), and CT of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), a region key to impulse control. A significant age-by-BMI interaction was observed in both adolescents and adults; however, the direction of this relationship differed between age groups. In adolescents, increased age-adjusted BMI Z-score attenuated age-related CT reductions globally and in frontal, temporal and occipital regions. In adults, increased BMI augmented age-related CT reductions, both globally and in bilateral parietal cortex. Although DD was unrelated to adiposity in both groups, increased DD and adiposity were both associated with reduced IFG thickness in adolescents and adults. Our findings suggest that the known age effects on CT in adolescence and adulthood are moderated by adiposity. The association between weight, cortical development and its functional implications would suggest that future studies of adolescent and adult brain development take adiposity into account.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent development; Impulsivity; Obesity; Structural MRI
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31751856 PMCID: PMC6913515 DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100728
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dev Cogn Neurosci ISSN: 1878-9293 Impact factor: 6.464
Demographic information by weight class in adolescents.
| Feature | Heathy weight ( | Overweight ( | Obese ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | Range | Range | ||||
| Sex | F = 19, M = 16 | F = 9, M = 8 | F = 7, M = 11 | |||
| Age (y) | 16.7 (1.4) | 14 – 18 | 16.9 (1.6) | 14 – 19 | 16.2 (1.5) | 14 – 19 |
| Education (y) | 10.7 (1.4) | 8 – 12 | 10.9 (1.6) | 8 – 13 | 10.2 (1.5) | 8 – 13 |
| BMI | 21.2 (2.1) | 17.2 – 25.3 | 26.7 (1.4) | 23.9 – 29.4 | 32.3 (2.4) | 26.4 – 36.3 |
| BMI Percentile | 51 (23) | 3 – 84 | 90 (2.7) | 85 – 94 | 98 (1) | 95 - 99 |
| Age-adjusted BMI Z-Score | 0.0 (0.7) | −2.0 – 1.0 | 1.3 (0.2) | 1.0 – 1.6 | 2.1 (0.2) | 1.7 – 2.5 |
| Body fat (%) | 16.1 (7.8) | 3 – 31.3 | 23.4 (10.2) | 3 – 37.9 | 31.5 (9.4) | 14.2 – 44.5 |
| Binge score | 1.2 (1.1) | 0 – 3 | 0.5 (0.7) | 0 – 2 | 1.2 (1.0) | 0 – 3 |
| BDI | 5.7 (5.0) | 0 – 14 | 6.2 (5.8) | 0 – 17 | 4.8 (5.0) | 0 – 14 |
| MCQ | 0.03 (0.03) | 0 – 0.13 | 0.02 (0.03) | 0 – 0.13 | 0.05 (0.08) | 0 – 0.25 |
| MCQ AUC | 0.52 (0.22) | 0.09 – 0.14 | 0.61 (0.26) | 0.14 – 0.98 | 0.56 (0.30) | 0.09 – 0.92 |
F = female; M = male; BMI = Body mass index; AUC = area under the curve; MCQ = Monetary Choice Questionnaire; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory.
Demographic information by weight class in adults.
| Feature | Heathy weight ( | Overweight ( | Obese ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | Range | Range | ||||
| Sex | F = 20, M = 14 | F = 11, M = 10 | F = 11, M = 9 | |||
| Age (y) | 32.9 (6.5) | 25 – 45 | 35.0 (6.3) | 25 – 45 | 32.2 (2.6) | 25 – 45 |
| Education (y) | 18.6 (3.7) | 12 – 25 | 17.9 (3.6) | 9 – 25 | 17.0 (4.0) | 10 – 24 |
| BMI | 22.1 (1.7) | 19.0 – 24.8 | 27.6 (1.6) | 25.2 – 29.9 | 33.5 (2.6) | 30 – 38.3 |
| Body fat (%) | 20.4 (6.1) | 12.2 – 34.4 | 29.3 (7.7) | 15.7 – 40.9 | 34.6 (8.8) | 16.7 – 44.4 |
| BDI | 5.8 (5.4) | 0 – 16 | 3.4 (4.4) | 0 – 15 | 3.7 (4.3) | 0 – 16 |
| MCQ | 0.02 (0.02) | 0 – 0.11 | 0.02 (0.03) | 0 – 0.13 | 0.01 (0.01) | 0 – 0.04 |
| MCQ AUC | 0.59 (0.21) | 0.14 – 0.93 | 0.50 (0.20) | 0.14 – 0.93 | 0.69 (0.19) | 0.29 – 1 |
F = female; M = male; BMI = Body mass index; AUC = area under the curve; MCQ = Monetary Choice Questionnaire; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory.
Fig. 1Combined effects of age and BMI-measures on global cortical thickness.A) Excess-weight adolescents show increased global CT between ages 14 and 19 relative to lean adolescents. X-axis values were jittered for improved visualisation. B) Increasing age and BMI are related to decreased global CT in adults. Data have been plotted by weight group for improved visualisation.
Increased BMI Z-score relates to greater cortical thickness across age in frontal, temporal and occipital regions in adolescents.
| FreeSurfer Region | Side | Cluster Size | Peak MNI Coordinates | Peak Score | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vertices | Size (mm2) | X | Y | Z | t | |||
| Pars orbitalis | L | 7603 | 4326.1 | −44.8 | 36.0 | −13.6 | 4.80 | .0002 |
| Lateral occipital | R | 1231 | 952.7 | 22.7 | −87.6 | −6.4 | 3.43 | .024* |
| Fusiform | L | 1145 | 854.6 | −27.9 | −78.8 | −7.6 | 2.78 | .04* |
| Superior frontal | R | 5956 | 3382.8 | 6.8 | 52.2 | 31.6 | 2.56 | .001 |
Notes: p-values <.05, *p-values <.01 for Monte Carlo Null-Z simulations for multiple comparisons correction.
Fig. 2Combined effects of age and adiposity relate to altered local cortical thickness in adolescents and adults.A & C) In adolescents, increased BMI Z-score and age related to greater CT in the left orbitofrontal cortex, left fusiform area, right superior frontal gyrus and right lateral occipital cortex. B & D) A significant age-by-BMI interaction was associated with reduced bilateral parietal CT in mid-adulthood. All scatterplots show peak CT values of significant clusters (Monte Carlo Null-Z simulation corrected p < .05). To improve visualisation, the continuous age by BMI measure interaction has been plotted by weight group.
Increased age and BMI relates to reduced cortical thickness in adults.
| FreeSurfer Region | Side | Cluster Size | Peak MNI Coordinates | Peak Score | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vertices | Size (mm2) | X | Y | Z | t | |||
| Inferior parietal | R | 20073 | 9979.7 | 47.4 | −63.4 | 30.5 | −4.13 | .0002 |
| Superior parietal | L | 5385 | 2295.2 | −25.9 | −49.5 | 60.3 | −3.60 | .023 |
Notes: p-values <.05 for Monte Carlo Null-Z simulations for multiple comparisons correction.
Fig. 3Delay discounting is related to decreased IFG thickness in both adolescents and adults with greater adiposity. A) DD moderated the relationship between BMI and left IFG thickness in adolescents and B) adults; participants with elevated adiposity and DD had reduced IFG pars triangularis thickness. C) DD was negatively correlated with right pars opercularis thickness in adults only. Area under the curve (AUC) was used to measure degree of discounting, where lower AUC represents higher DD. For illustration purposes, data have been plotted by weight group (HW = healthy weight, OB = obese, OW = overweight).