Literature DB >> 31751815

Delayed disengagement of attention from distractors signalling reward.

Poppy Watson1, Daniel Pearson2, Jan Theeuwes3, Steven B Most2, Mike E Le Pelley2.   

Abstract

Attention refers to the set of cognitive mechanisms that facilitate the prioritization of incoming sensory information. Existing research suggests that motivationally salient stimuli, such as those associated with reward, are prioritized by the attention system and that this prioritization occurs independently of an observer's goals. Specifically, studies of visual search have shown that stimuli signalling the availability of monetary reward are more likely to capture eye movements, even when participants are motivated to ignore such stimuli. In the current study we ask whether reward magnitude influences only the likelihood that stimuli will capture spatial attention, or whether reward also influences the ease with which people can disengage attention from a location when they are motivated to move their attention elsewhere. Three experiments examined the time taken to disengage from a centrally presented distractor that signalled the availability of high or low reward. We found that participants took longer to move their eyes away from a high-reward distractor, even though this came at financial cost (Experiment 1), that participants were unable to suppress a high-reward distractor consistently presented at the central location (Experiment 2), that slower responding was not due to behavioural freezing in the presence of a signal of high reward (Experiment 3), and that slower responding persisted even when rewards were no longer available (Experiment 4). These results indicate that reward modulates attentional disengagement: signals of high reward hold attention for longer, even when this is counterproductive for performance of ongoing tasks. Our findings further highlight the role of reward in the conflict between automatic and goal-directed attentional processing.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Attentional capture; Cognitive control; Disengagement; Reward

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31751815     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  6 in total

1.  Reduced attentional capture by reward following an acute dose of alcohol.

Authors:  Poppy Watson; Daniel Pearson; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Neural Connectivity Underlying Reward and Emotion-Related Processing: Evidence From a Large-Scale Network Analysis.

Authors:  Ala Yankouskaya; Toby Denholm-Smith; Dewei Yi; Andrew James Greenshaw; Bo Cao; Jie Sui
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-07

3.  Learning to avoid looking: Competing influences of reward on overt attentional selection.

Authors:  Daniel Pearson; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-10

4.  Cognitive decline in Huntington's disease in the Digitalized Arithmetic Task (DAT).

Authors:  Marine Lunven; Jennifer Hamet Bagnou; Katia Youssov; Alexis Gabadinho; Rafika Fliss; Justine Montillot; Etienne Audureau; Blanche Bapst; Graça Morgado; Ralf Reilmann; Robin Schubert; Monica Busse; David Craufurd; Renaud Massart; Anne Rosser; Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluative distractors modulate attentional disengagement: People would rather stay longer on rewards.

Authors:  Minmin Yan; Qing Li; Quanshan Long; Liang Xu; Na Hu; Antao Chen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

6.  On the Influence of Spatial and Value Attentional Cues Across Individuals.

Authors:  Kelly G Garner; Michelle Lovell-Kane; Luke Carroll; Paul E Dux
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-06-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.