| Literature DB >> 31751311 |
Bekir Cakir1, F Neslihan Cuhaci Seyrek1, Oya Topaloglu1, Didem Ozdemir1, Ahmet Dirikoc1, Cevdet Aydin1, Sefika Burcak Polat1, Berna Evranos Ogmen1, Ali Abbas Tam1, Husniye Baser1, Aylin Kilic Yazgan2, Mehmet Kilic3, Afra Alkan4, Reyhan Ersoy1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite significant improvement in imaging quality and advanced scientific knowledge, it may still sometimes be difficult to distinguish different parathyroid lesions. The aims of this prospective study were to evaluate parathyroid lesions with ultrasound elastography and to determine whether strain index can help to differentiate parathyroid lesions.Entities:
Keywords: atypical parathyroid adenoma; elastography score; parathyroid adenoma; strain index; ultrasound elastography
Year: 2019 PMID: 31751311 PMCID: PMC6933834 DOI: 10.1530/EC-19-0443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endocr Connect ISSN: 2049-3614 Impact factor: 3.335
Figure 1Ultrasound elastography score and strain index measurements in parathyroid lesions.
Figure 2Flowchart of the patients in the study.
Demographical, clinical and biochemical findings of patients with different parathyroid lesions.
| Variables | All patients ( | Hyperplasia ( | Adenoma ( | Atypical adenoma ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 54 (20–82) | 49.5 (26–71) | 54 (20–78) | 52 (34–82) | 0.636 |
| Sex | 0.729 | ||||
| Female | 202 (87.8) | 10 (83.3) | 171 (88.6) | 21 (84) | |
| Male | 28 (12.2) | 2 (16.7) | 22 (11.4) | 4 (16) | |
| Calcium (mg/dL) | 11.3 (9.2–18.5) | 10.8 (10.1–12.1) | 11.3 (9.2–18.5) | 11.4 (10.2–15.3) | |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 4.6 (3.6–5.8) | 4.4 (4.2–4.9) | 4.6 (3.6–5.8) | 4.6 (3.8–4.9) | 0.616 |
| Phosphorus (mg/dL) | 2.6 (1.1–7.0) | 2.5 (1.8–6.1) | 2.6 (1.1–7.0) | 2.3 (1.4–3.9) | 0.171 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.7 (0.3–9.5) | 0.7 (0.5–9.5) | 0.7 (0.3–8.4) | 0.7 (0.4–4.2) | 0.878 |
| ALP (IU/L) | 96 (27–1163) | 104 (61–776) | 93.5 (32–1163) | 117 (27–427) | 0.148 |
| PTH (pg/mL) | 139 (44–2800) | 186 (71.9–2235) | 133.8 (44–2800) | 209 (93–1703) | |
| 25-Hydroxy vitamin D (µg/L) | 15.8 (2.2–101) | 14.4 (7.6–55) | 16.0 (2.2–101) | 9.4 (3.2–51.7) | 0.322 |
| 24-h urinary calcium (mg/day) | 374.5 (55.5–1191) | 400 (152–947) | 375 (55.5–1153) | 358 (113–1191) | 0.929 |
| 24-h urinary phosphorus (g/day) | 735 (0.8–2060) | 850 (490–1320) | 740 (0.8–2060) | 695 (360–1810) | 0.423 |
| BMD | 0.215 | ||||
| Normal | 41 (20.2) | 0 (0) | 36 (21.2) | 5 (23.8) | |
| Osteopenia | 65 (32) | 5 (41.7) | 53 (31.2) | 7 (33.3) | |
| Osteoporosis | 97(47.8) | 7 (58.3) | 81 (47.6) | 9 (42.9) | |
| Nephrolitiasis | 0.117 | ||||
| Present | 57 (26.8) | 5 (55.6) | 45 (24.9) | 7 (30.4) | |
| Absent | 156 (73.2) | 4 (44.4) | 136 (75.1) | 16 (69.6) |
aP = 0.094 for hyperplasia vs adenoma, P = 0.019 for hyperplasia vs atypical adenoma, P = 0.397 for adenoma vs atypical adenoma. bP = 0.461 for hyperplasia vs adenoma, P = 0.773 for hyperplasia vs atypical adenoma, P < 0.001 for adenoma vs atypical adenoma. Bold indicates P < 0.05.
ALP, alkaline phosphatase; BMD, bone mineral density; PTH, parathyroid hormone.
Figure 3Whole slide imaging (WSI) of the (A) parathyroid adenoma; diffuse pattern of parathyroid adenoma consisting of chief and clear cells with normal parathyroid tissue at one side, (B) atypical parathyroid adenoma; thick fibrous bands between the neoplastic cells, cystic spaces and the presence of neoplastic cells in the capsule.
Clinical diagnosis and histopathological findings of the patients.
| Clinical hyper-parathyroidism status | Causative clinical diagnosis | Number of patients with their parathyroid lesions |
|---|---|---|
| Primary hyper-parathyroidism ( | Only primary hyper-parathyroidism | 213 patients with single adenoma |
| MEN-1 | 1 patient with 3 hyperplasia lesions | |
| Tertiary hyper-parathyroidism ( | CRD | 1 patient with 1 hyperplasia lesion |
CRD, chronic renal disease; MEN-1, multiple endocrine neoplasia-1.
Conventional ultrasonography and ultrasound elastography features, Technetium-99m-sestamibi results and histopathological diameter of different parathyroid lesions.
| Hyperplasia ( | Adenoma ( | Atypical adenoma ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Side | 0.518 | |||
| Left | 9 (52.9) | 94 (46.5) | 15 (57.7) | |
| Right | 8 (47.1) | 108(53.5) | 11 (42.3) | |
| Localization | ||||
| Superior | 2 (11.8) | 18 (8.9) | 3 (11.5) | |
| Middle | 3 (17.6) | 38 (18.8) | 4 (15.4) | |
| Inferior | 11 (64.7) | 145 (71.8) | 19 (73.1) | |
| Ectopic | 1 (5.9) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Diameter (mm) | ||||
| Anteroposterior | 8.6 (4.5–20.3)a | 8.8 (2.4–26.5)b | 11.55 (5.2–30)ab | |
| Transverse | 8 (3.2–17.4)a | 7.8 (2.4–22.7)b | 11.4 (3.5–45)ab | |
| Longitudinal | 14 (6.5–28) | 14.6 (3.4–48.5)a | 20.35 (6.9–49.7)a | |
| Volume (mL) | 0.49 (0.06–3.31)a | 0.54 (0.04–14.99)b | 1.51 (0.07–31.6)ab | |
| Echogenicity | – | |||
| Hypoechoic | 17 (100.0) | 186 (92.1) | 23 (88.5) | |
| Isoechoic | 0 (0.0) | 14 (6.9) | 3 (11.5) | |
| Hyperechoic | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Texture | ||||
| Solid | 14 (82.4) | 174 (86.1) | 16 (61.5) | |
| Partial cystic | 3 (17.6) | 28 (13.9) | 10 (38.5) | |
| Blood flow pattern | 0.635 | |||
| Type 0 | 0 (0) | 24 (11.9) | 3 (11.5) | |
| Type 1 | 8 (47.1) | 77 (38.1) | 13 (50.0) | |
| Type 2 | 7 (41.2) | 69 (34.2 | 6 (23.1) | |
| Type 3 | 2 (11.7) | 32 (15.8) | 4 (15.4) | |
| Elastography score | ||||
| Score 1 | 9 (52.9) | 84 (41.5) | 7 (26.9) | |
| Score 2 | 5 (29.4) | 100 (49.5) | 16 (61.6) | |
| Score 3 | 2 (11.8) | 9 (4.5) | 2 (7.7) | |
| Score 4 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Score X | 1 (5.9) | 8 (4.0) | 1 (3.8) | |
| Median strain index | 0.91 (0.26–2.02)a | 1.01 (0.21–8.43)b | 1.5 (0.56–4.86)ab | |
| MIBI | ||||
| Positive | 6 (35.3) | 110 (60.1) | 18 (75) | |
| Negative | 11 (64.7) | 73 (39.9) | 6 (25) | |
| Histopathological diameter (mm) | 1.5 (0.4–3.0)a | 1.5 (0.5–5.5)b | 2 (1.0–5.0)ab |
abGroups are significantly different for corresponding measurement (P < 0.05). cP = 0.710 for hyperplasia vs adenoma, P = 0.140 for hyperplasia vs atypical adenoma, P = 0.004 for adenoma vs atypical adenoma. dP = 0.047 for hyperplasia vs adenoma, P = 0.011 for hyperplasia vs atypical adenoma, P = 0.160 for adenoma vs atypical adenoma. Bold indicates P < 0.05.
Figure 4ROC curves for strain index.
Discrimination performance of the strain index in different parathyroid lesions.
| Adenoma vs hyperplasia | Atypical adenoma vs adenoma | Atypical adenoma vs hyperplasia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | |
| Mean SI | |||
| AUC (95% CI) | 0.597 (0.458–0.736) | 0.690 (0.588–0.792) | 0.773 (0.628–0.917) |
| | 0.198 | ||
| Cut-off point | – | ≥1.0225 | ≥1.40 |
| Sensitivity (95% CI) | – | 0.800 (0.609–0.911) | 0.560 (0.371–0.733) |
| Specificity (95% CI) | – | 0.508 (0.438–0.577) | 0.875 (0.640–0.965) |
AUC, area under curve; SI, strain index. Bold indicates P < 0.05.
Published studies evaluating parathyroid lesions with ultrasound elastography.
| Study | PA ( | PH ( | PC ( | Thyroid nodule/tissue ( | Lymph node ( | ESG technique and medical company | Main finding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azizi | 57 | – | 54 | – | SWE using the virtual touch imaging quantification | Median shear wave velocity was 2.02 m/sn in PAs, whereas 2.77 m/sn in thyroid tissue | |
| Polat | 54 | 33 | 31 | SWE using the virtual touch tissue imaging quantification | Mean shear wave velocity of PAs were higher than PHs or lymph nodes (2.16 ± 0.33 m/sn, 1.75 ± 0.28 m/sn and 1.86 ± 0.37 m/sn, respectively) | ||
| Altinbas and Yagci (4) | 46 | 4 | 52 lymph nodes in HT patients and 51 juguler reactive lymph nodes | Elasticity score measured by real time strain sonoelastography | Elasticity score of parathyroid lesions, lymph nodes of HT patients and reactive jugular lymph nodes were; 2.30 ± 0.91, 2.70 ± 0.93 and 1.88 ± 0.59, respectively | ||
| Unluturk | 59 | 32 | – | – | Strain ratio | Median strain ratio of PAs were higher than PHs (3.56 vs 1.49) | |
| Golu | 21 | 1 | 43 | – | Elasticity index measured by 2D-SWE | Mean elasticity index was lower in parathyroid lesions than thyroid parenchyma (10.2 ± 4.9 vs 19.5 ± 7.6 kPa) | |
| Stangierski | 65 | 51 | Elasticity measured by SWE | PAs were more elastic than benign thyroid nodules (mean elasticity were 5.2 ± 7.2 vs 24.3 ± 33.8 kPa) | |||
| Hattapoğlu | 32 | 4 | 21/36 | SWE using virtual touch tissue quantification method | The mean shear wave velocity of PAs, PHs, benign thyroid nodules and normal thyroid parenchyma were 2.28 ± 0.5 m/sn, 1.46 ± 0.23 m/sn, 2.25 ± 0.51 m/sn and 1.62 ± 0.20, respectively | ||
| Batur | 21 | 71 | 2D-SWE using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging | PAs had significantly higher stiffness than benign thyroid nodules and lower stiffness than malignant thyroid nodules (mean shear wave velocity was 3.09 ± 0.75, 2.20 ± 0.39 and 3.59 ± 0.43 m/sn, respectively) | |||
| Isidori | 15 | 29 | 3 | 18 | 14 | Elastoscan core index with ultrasound elastography | Mean elastoscan core index of PAs were higher than PHs and reactive lymph nodes (1.77 ± 0.54, 1.35 ± 0.61, 1.12 ± 0.58, respectively) and similar to benign thyroid nodules (1.72 ± 0.66) and lower than PCs (3.47 ± 0.77) |
| Chandramohan | 43 | 4 | 93 | SWE using acoustic radiation force impulse technology. Shear wave velocity measured with virtual touch quantification | The mean shear wave velocity of the parathyroid lesion (1.6 ± 0.78 m/s) was significantly lower than benign (2.11 ± 0.8 m/s) and malignant (4.3 ± 2.71 m/s) thyroid nodules |
HT, hashimoto thyroiditis; PA, parathyroid adenoma; PC, parathyroid carcinoma; PH, parathyroid hyperplasia; SWE, shear wave elastography.