Dong-Han Lee1, Sang-Youp Lee2, Minhyung Lee1, Jungirl Seok1, Sung Joon Park3, Young Ju Jin2, Doh Young Lee1, Tack-Kyun Kwon1. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital, Wonkwang University College of Medicine, Iksan, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yeouido St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
Importance: Permanent surgical treatment for unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) should be performed when further neural recovery is improbable. Conservative delay of the surgical procedure may cause unnecessary deterioration of the patient's quality of life. Knowledge of the natural course of UVFP is important for better management and counseling. Objective: To evaluate the natural course of UVFP, focusing on the recovery time according to the injury level to assess the optimal timing for permanent surgical intervention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective case series enrolled 1264 patients with UVFP who visited the voice clinic of Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, from November 1, 2005, through December 31, 2016. Medical records and stroboscopic video images were reviewed to obtain data on demographic characteristics, vocal fold movement, onset and recovery time, follow-up duration, and cause. Cases of UVFP were classified into 5 groups based on the location of injury: distal to the thyroid level, thyroid level, esophagus and mediastinum level, heart and lung level, and proximal to the thorax level. Data analysis was performed from January 23, 2018, to May 21, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Recovery of vocal fold movement defined as more than vocal fold twitching confirmed by stroboscopy video images, estimated injury level, and start time of recovery. The recovery time was analyzed according to age, sex, paralytic side, and 5 injury levels. Results: Of 1264 eligible patients with UVFP (655 [51.8%] male; median age, 56 years [range, 1-90 years]), 208 had evidence of recovery with the recovery time relatively accurate. The maximum recovery time for the group with distal to the thyroid-level injury was 120 days; the group with thyroid-level injury, 157 days; the group with esophagus and mediastinum-level injury, 244 days; the group with heart and lung-level injury, 328 days; and the group with proximal to the thorax-level injury, 333 days with the exception of 1 outlier value (482 days). Recovery time did not differ according to age, sex, or paralytic side. As distance between the vocal fold and injury level increased, the maximum recovery time increased, plateauing at 1 year. Among the patients who showed recovery of the vocal fold movement, most patients with injuries distal to or at the level of the thyroid recovered within 6 months, whereas those with injury more distant from the vocal fold recovered within approximately 1 year. Conclusions and Relevance: A linear association between injury level and maximum recovery time was observed. The findings suggest that the decision to proceed with permanent phonosurgical treatment should be based on the level of injury associated with UVFP.
Importance: Permanent surgical treatment for unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) should be performed when further neural recovery is improbable. Conservative delay of the surgical procedure may cause unnecessary deterioration of the patient's quality of life. Knowledge of the natural course of UVFP is important for better management and counseling. Objective: To evaluate the natural course of UVFP, focusing on the recovery time according to the injury level to assess the optimal timing for permanent surgical intervention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective case series enrolled 1264 patients with UVFP who visited the voice clinic of Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, from November 1, 2005, through December 31, 2016. Medical records and stroboscopic video images were reviewed to obtain data on demographic characteristics, vocal fold movement, onset and recovery time, follow-up duration, and cause. Cases of UVFP were classified into 5 groups based on the location of injury: distal to the thyroid level, thyroid level, esophagus and mediastinum level, heart and lung level, and proximal to the thorax level. Data analysis was performed from January 23, 2018, to May 21, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Recovery of vocal fold movement defined as more than vocal fold twitching confirmed by stroboscopy video images, estimated injury level, and start time of recovery. The recovery time was analyzed according to age, sex, paralytic side, and 5 injury levels. Results: Of 1264 eligible patients with UVFP (655 [51.8%] male; median age, 56 years [range, 1-90 years]), 208 had evidence of recovery with the recovery time relatively accurate. The maximum recovery time for the group with distal to the thyroid-level injury was 120 days; the group with thyroid-level injury, 157 days; the group with esophagus and mediastinum-level injury, 244 days; the group with heart and lung-level injury, 328 days; and the group with proximal to the thorax-level injury, 333 days with the exception of 1 outlier value (482 days). Recovery time did not differ according to age, sex, or paralytic side. As distance between the vocal fold and injury level increased, the maximum recovery time increased, plateauing at 1 year. Among the patients who showed recovery of the vocal fold movement, most patients with injuries distal to or at the level of the thyroid recovered within 6 months, whereas those with injury more distant from the vocal fold recovered within approximately 1 year. Conclusions and Relevance: A linear association between injury level and maximum recovery time was observed. The findings suggest that the decision to proceed with permanent phonosurgical treatment should be based on the level of injury associated with UVFP.
Authors: F Rubin; A Villeneuve; L Alciato; L Slaïm; P Bonfils; O Laccourreye Journal: Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 2.080
Authors: Giannicola Iannella; Giuseppe Magliulo; Milena Di Luca; Andrea De Vito; Giuseppe Meccariello; Giovanni Cammaroto; Stefano Pelucchi; Anna Bonsembiante; Antonino Maniaci; Claudio Vicini Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Luca Revelli; Pierpaolo Gallucci; Maria Raffaella Marchese; Nikolaos Voloudakis; Sofia Di Lorenzo; Claudio Montuori; Lucia D'Alatri; Francesco Pennestri; Carmela De Crea; Marco Raffaelli Journal: World J Surg Date: 2022-10-12 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Chang Hwan Ryu; Seung Jin Lee; Jae-Gu Cho; Ik Joon Choi; Yoon Seok Choi; Yong Tae Hong; Soo Yeon Jung; Ji Won Kim; Doh Young Lee; Dong Kun Lee; GIljoon Lee; Sang Joon Lee; Young Chan Lee; Yong Sang Lee; Inn Chul Nam; Ki Nam Park; Young Min Park; Eui-Suk Sung; Hee Young Son; In Hyo Seo; Byung-Joo Lee; Jae-Yol Lim Journal: Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.372