Miguel Simancas-Pallares1,2, Mike T John3, Christopher Enstad4, Patricia Lenton5. 1. Division of Pediatric and Public Health, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 2. Division of Oral and Craniofacial Health Sciences, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 3. Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 4. HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 5. Oral Health Clinical Research Clinic, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the 5-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-Sp5). METHODS: Spanish-speaking dental patients (n = 331, response rate = 61%, age: 42.9 + 12.3 years, 59% female) with a scheduled appointment at HealthPartners dental clinics in Minnesota, USA, were investigated. To assess score reliability, we computed Cronbach's alpha, expecting 'good' reliability (alpha > 0.70). To assess score validity, we correlated the OHIP-Sp5 summary score with five OHRQoL measures [49- and 14-item OHIP-Sp, the Spanish version of the General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI-Sp), the Spanish version of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP-Sp) and a Global Oral Health Assessment]. We expected a pattern of 'very large' (r > 0.70) correlation coefficients for OHIP-Sp5 relationships with the two longer OHIP-Sp versions and 'large' (r > 0.50) correlation coefficients for the other three measures. RESULTS: Patients had a mean OHIP-Sp5 score of 3.7 (SD = 4.0). The Instrument's reliability was, as expected, 'good', according to the Cronbach's alpha statistic of 0.83. The Instrument's validity was supported by the expected pattern of validity coefficients. OHIP-Sp5 summary scores correlated with OHIP-Sp14 as well as with OHIP-Sp49 (both r = 0.95: 'very large' effect) and with GOHAI-Sp, OIDP and the Global Oral Health Assessment with r = -0.80, 0.73, and -0.56 (absolute effect magnitude all 'very large' or 'large'), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of OHIP-5 is a brief and psychometrically sound instrument to measure oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in Spanish-speaking populations. It can effectively replace longer OHIP instruments and would be applicable across all settings of clinical practice and research.
OBJECTIVE: To test validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the 5-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-Sp5). METHODS: Spanish-speaking dental patients (n = 331, response rate = 61%, age: 42.9 + 12.3 years, 59% female) with a scheduled appointment at HealthPartners dental clinics in Minnesota, USA, were investigated. To assess score reliability, we computed Cronbach's alpha, expecting 'good' reliability (alpha > 0.70). To assess score validity, we correlated the OHIP-Sp5 summary score with five OHRQoL measures [49- and 14-item OHIP-Sp, the Spanish version of the General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI-Sp), the Spanish version of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP-Sp) and a Global Oral Health Assessment]. We expected a pattern of 'very large' (r > 0.70) correlation coefficients for OHIP-Sp5 relationships with the two longer OHIP-Sp versions and 'large' (r > 0.50) correlation coefficients for the other three measures. RESULTS: Patients had a mean OHIP-Sp5 score of 3.7 (SD = 4.0). The Instrument's reliability was, as expected, 'good', according to the Cronbach's alpha statistic of 0.83. The Instrument's validity was supported by the expected pattern of validity coefficients. OHIP-Sp5 summary scores correlated with OHIP-Sp14 as well as with OHIP-Sp49 (both r = 0.95: 'very large' effect) and with GOHAI-Sp, OIDP and the Global Oral Health Assessment with r = -0.80, 0.73, and -0.56 (absolute effect magnitude all 'very large' or 'large'), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of OHIP-5 is a brief and psychometrically sound instrument to measure oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in Spanish-speaking populations. It can effectively replace longer OHIP instruments and would be applicable across all settings of clinical practice and research.
Authors: Mike T John; Diana L Miglioretti; Linda LeResche; Thomas D Koepsell; Philippe Hujoel; Wolfgang Micheelis Journal: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 3.383
Authors: Sergio Sánchez-García; Erika Heredia-Ponce; Teresa Juárez-Cedillo; Katia Gallegos-Carrillo; Claudia Espinel-Bermúdez; Javier de la Fuente-Hernández; Carmen García-Peña Journal: J Public Health Dent Date: 2010 Impact factor: 1.821
Authors: M T John; K Rener-Sitar; K Baba; A Čelebić; P Larsson; G Szabo; W E Norton; D R Reissmann Journal: J Oral Rehabil Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 3.837
Authors: M T John; M Omara; N Su; T List; S Sekulic; B Häggman-Henrikson; C M Visscher; K Bekes; D R Reissmann; K Baba; O Schierz; N Theis-Mahon; K Fueki; T Stamm; L Bondemark; I Oghli; A van Wijk; P Larsson Journal: J Evid Based Dent Pract Date: 2021-08-10 Impact factor: 5.267
Authors: Fabiana Velasquez; Evelyn Nuñez; Juan Diego Gutiérrrez; Pedro Christian Aravena Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 2.314
Authors: Stephanie Bela Andela; Ragna Lamprecht; Mike T John; Swaha Pattanaik; Daniel R Reissmann Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 3.606