| Literature DB >> 31750427 |
Juha T Silvola1, Saku T Sinkkonen2, Jens Wanscher3, Eva Westman4, Niels H Holm5, Therese Ovesen5,6.
Abstract
There is no unanimous consensus for indications of eustachian tube balloon dilation (ETBD). Nordic countries have relatively similar hospital organizations and treatment guidelines. Therefore, it was logical to organize a consensus meeting of ETBD. The symposium: Nordic Experiences on Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation, in Copenhagen, 30-31 March, 2017. The panellists from Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden and the attendees of the meeting agreed a consensus on the following issues: Candidates, Definition of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction, Diagnostic Work up, Differential Diagnosis, Contraindications, ETBD Procedure, Complications, Follow-up, and Outcomes. The article also presents the status for ETBD in each of these countries. Thereafter the consensus statement has been discussed in the national societies and meetings for ear surgeons in each of these countries. It can be assumed that surgeons in the hospitals of these Nordic countries generally follow the recommendations from the consensus meeting.Entities:
Keywords: Balloon dilation; Eustachian tube; Eustachian tube dysfunction; Nordic consensus
Year: 2019 PMID: 31750427 PMCID: PMC6849347 DOI: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2019.09.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg ISSN: 2095-8811
Fig. 1Number of ETBDs per year in Denmark.
Fig. 2Number of patients treated with ETBD per year in Finland (Source: National Institute for Health and Welfare).
Fig. 3Number of numbers for Spiggle&Theis balloon sold in Norway per year.
Fig. 4Estimated number of patients operated with ETBD, either bi- or unilateral procedures, per year in Sweden from February 2014 to December 2018.