Literature DB >> 31750178

CO2 Laser for De-epithelialization in Tympanoplasty.

Lakshmi Nair1, Neil Gildener-Leapman2, Steven Parnes2.   

Abstract

Tympanoplasty repairs tympanic membrane perforations but also covers an umbrella of procedures characterized by surgery of the mastoid bone. Tympanoplasty is widely regarded as a beneficial procedure with an over 90% graft closure success rate and an over 80% return to normal hearing range. Though surgical technique and graft type are important in determining surgical outcomes of the procedure, results are most greatly correlated with location of the perforation. Marginal perforations are associated with the most complications in reconstruction of the tympanic membrane, lack of vascularization and limited membrane area delaying the healing process (4). Lasers have been used in medical procedures dating back to the 1960s. The advantage of infrared lasers such as CO2 are the precision of cutting and the smooth interaction with tissues (5). The CO2 laser is absorbed by the tympanic membrane and does not damage the middle ear while visible lasers penetrate and can damage the ear drum (6). This retrospective study of 150 patients from 2013-2016 assesses and demonstrates the viability of using carbon dioxide laser as an alternative to the traditional method for de-epithelialization of tympanic perforation margins during tympanoplasty. By comparing closure rates and audiogram data, this study reveals parameters of use, benefits and adverse outcomes on healing and hearing restoration with the CO2 laser-assisted method. Perforation closure rate of 91% and hearing improvement in 66% of patients was observed. Fourteen patients did not undergo closure of the tympanic membrane with an overwhelming majority of the 14 having large and marginal perforations. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laser; Membrane; Perforation; Tympanic; Tympanoplasty

Year:  2018        PMID: 31750178      PMCID: PMC6841804          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-018-1430-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  8 in total

1.  "Window shade" tympanoplasty for anterior marginal perforations.

Authors:  Scott Schraff; Nariman Dash; Barry Strasnick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Revision surgery for chronic otitis media: characteristics and outcomes in comparison with primary surgery.

Authors:  Yang-Sun Cho; Sang Duk Hong; Kyu Whan Chung; Sung Hwa Hong; Won-Ho Chung; Shin Hong Park
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 1.863

3.  Pre-Operative and Post-Operative Assessment of Hearing following Tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Sharankumar Shetty
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-12-07

Review 4.  Tympanoplasty: an up-to-date pictorial review.

Authors:  Matteo Alicandri-Ciufelli; Daniele Marchioni; Alberto Grammatica; Davide Soloperto; Paolo Carpeggiani; Daniele Monzani; Livio Presutti
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 3.447

5.  Use of the flexible fiber CO2 laser in pediatric transcanal endoscopic middle ear surgery.

Authors:  Lukas D Landegger; Michael S Cohen
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Prognostic factors in type I tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Mehti Salviz; Ozlem Bayram; Ali Alper Bayram; Hasan Huseyin Balikci; Tzemal Chatzi; Ceki Paltura; Murat Haluk Ozkul
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 1.863

7.  Outcomes of type I tympanoplasty using a cartilage shield graft in patients with poor prognostic factors.

Authors:  Kyung Wook Heo
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 1.863

8.  Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Surgical Outcome in Tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Masoud Naderpour; Yalda Jabbari Moghadam; Ensieh Ghanbarpour; Nikzad Shahidi
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.