Literature DB >> 31750112

Three Dimensional Rhinoplasty and Nasal Airway Improvement in Cleft-Nose Deformity.

John Oommen1, Hafiz Muhammed Koyappathody1, Kader Kalathingal1, Chandrabose Vellani Thamunni1, Subin Joseph1, Srivatsa M Shet1, Rajesh Vardhan Pydi1, Anand Sivadasan1, Santhy Mohanachandran Nair1, Srikant Aruna Samantaray1, R S Nithin1, Joe Antony1.   

Abstract

Septorhinoplasty is particularly challenging among revision surgeries for cleft sequelae. The challenge of cleft septorhinoplasty is mainly due to the complex anatomy of nose, deformity of each of its components and the difficulty and lack of clarity in surgical management. From 2014 to 2017, 26 patients with cleft lip nose deformity were operated by the same cleft team. The study was conducted to assess the improvement in nasal airway and appearance following secondary rhinoplasty with extracorporeal septoplasty. Post operatively each patient was evaluated using the standard modified rhinoplasty outcome evaluation questionnaire, a validated instrument that aids in stratifying patients according to their subjective response. All patients reported great relief of nasal obstruction and improved breathing. More than 80% of our patients were satisfied with improved aesthetics and reported better self-confidence. Secondary cleft rhinoplasty with extracorporeal septoplasty surgery significantly improves the cosmesis and nasal airway opening, subsequently giving them improved self-confidence. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cleft rhinoplasty; Congenital cleft deformity; Extracorporeal septoplasty; Functional nasal airway; Rhinoplasty outcome evaluation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31750112      PMCID: PMC6838296          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-019-01690-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  14 in total

1.  Correction of the cleft-lip nasal deformity.

Authors:  Charles W Shih; Jonathan M Sykes
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.446

2.  Prospective Patient-Related Outcome Evaluation of Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty Using a Validated Questionnaire.

Authors:  Adam R Sawyer; Stephen Robinson; Michael Cadier
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2016-07-19

3.  Twenty-five years experience with extracorporeal septoplasty.

Authors:  Wolfgang Gubisch
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.446

4.  Anterior septal reconstruction: outcomes after a modified extracorporeal septoplasty technique.

Authors:  Sam P Most
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2006 May-Jun

Review 5.  Caudal septal deviation.

Authors:  Jason Haack; Ira D Papel
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 6.  Cleft Septorhinoplasty: Form and Function.

Authors:  Tsung-Yen Hsieh; Raj Dedhia; Drew Del Toro; Travis T Tollefson
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.918

7.  Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study.

Authors:  R Alsarraf; W F Larrabee; S Anderson; C S Murakami; C M Johnson
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep

8.  Modification of the maxillary Le Fort I osteotomy in cleft-orthognathic surgery: the bilateral cleft lip and palate deformity.

Authors:  J C Posnick; B Tompson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Secondary correction of nasal deformities in cleft lip and palate patients: surgical technique and outcome evaluation.

Authors:  Gabor Vass; Gabor Mohos; Zsofia Bere; Laszlo Ivan; Janos Varga; Jozsef Piffko; Laszlo Rovo
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Nasal Airway Evaluation After Le Fort I Osteotomy Combined With Septoplasty in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.

Authors:  Zhongying Wang; Peihua Wang; Yixin Zhang; Guofang Shen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.