Literature DB >> 31750045

Estimation of Intraoperative Stimulation Threshold of the Facial Nerve in Patients Undergoing Microvascular Decompression.

Rafey A Feroze1, Michael M McDowell1, Jeffrey Balzer1, Donald J Crammond1, Partha Thirumala1, Raymond F Sekula1.   

Abstract

Introduction  Facial weakness can result from surgical manipulation of the facial nerve. Intraoperative neuromonitoring reduces functional impairment but no clear guidelines exist regarding interpretation of intraoperative electrophysiological results. Most studies describe subjects with facial nerves encumbered by tumors or those with various grades of facial nerve weakness. We sought to obtain the neurophysiological parameters and stimulation threshold following intraoperative facial nerve triggered electromyography (t-EMG) stimulation during microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia to characterize the response of normal facial nerves via t-EMG. Methods  Facial nerve t-EMG stimulation was performed in seven patients undergoing microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Using constant current stimulation, single stimulation pulses of 0.025 to 0.2 mA intensity were applied to the proximal facial nerve. Compound muscle action potentials, duration to onset, and termination of t-EMG responses were recorded for the orbicularis oculi and mentalis muscles. Patients were evaluated for facial weakness following the surgical procedure. Results  Quantifiable t-EMG responses were generated in response to all tested stimulation currents of 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mA in both muscles, indicating effective nerve conduction. No patients developed facial weakness postoperatively. Conclusions  The presence of t-EMG amplitudes in response to 0.025 mA suggests that facial nerve conduction can take place at lower stimulation intensities than previously reported in patients with tumor burden. Proximal facial nerve stimulation that yields responses with thresholds less than 0.05 mA may be a preferred reference baseline for surgical procedures within the cerebellopontine angle to prevent iatrogenic injury. © Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMAP; stimulation threshold; t-EMG; trigeminal neuralgia

Year:  2019        PMID: 31750045      PMCID: PMC6864418          DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1677538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  18 in total

Review 1.  Facial nerve monitoring during cerebellopontine angle and skull base tumor surgery: a systematic review from description to current success on function prediction.

Authors:  Marcus André Acioly; Marina Liebsch; Paulo Henrique Pires de Aguiar; Marcos Tatagiba
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  The value of intraoperative facial nerve electromyography in predicting facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Authors:  Michael E Sughrue; Rajwant Kaur; Ari J Kane; Martin J Rutkowski; Gurvinder Kaur; Isaac Yang; Lawrence H Pitts; Andrew T Parsa
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  Prediction of facial nerve function after surgery for cerebellopontine angle tumors: use of a facial nerve stimulator and monitor.

Authors:  P J Kirkpatrick; G Watters; A J Strong; J R Walliker; M J Gleeson
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1991

4.  MRI findings in patients with a history of failed prior microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: how to image and where to look.

Authors:  M A Hughes; B F Branstetter; C T Taylor; S Fakhran; W T Delfyett; A M Frederickson; R F Sekula
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during endoscopic endonasal approach to skull base surgery: analysis of observed changes.

Authors:  Parthasarathy D Thirumala; Amin B Kassasm; Miguel Habeych; Kelley Wichman; Yue-Fang Chang; Paul Gardner; Daniel Prevedello; Carl Snyderman; Ricardo Carrau; Donald J Crammond; Jeffrey Balzer
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Acoustic neuroma surgery outcomes.

Authors:  D M Kaylie; E Gilbert; M A Horgan; J B Delashaw; S O McMenomey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Value of free-run electromyographic monitoring of lower cranial nerves in endoscopic endonasal approach to skull base surgeries.

Authors:  Parthasarathy D Thirumala; Santhosh Kumar Mohanraj; Miguel Habeych; Kelley Wichman; Yue-Fang Chang; Paul Gardner; Carl Snyderman; Donald J Crammond; Jeffrey Balzer
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-05-25

8.  Reduction in high-frequency hearing loss following technical modifications to microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.

Authors:  Parthasarathy Thirumala; Andrew M Frederickson; Jeffrey Balzer; Donald Crammond; Miguel E Habeych; Yue-Fang Chang; Raymond F Sekula
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Prediction of postoperative facial nerve function in acoustic neuroma surgery.

Authors:  J E Fenton; R Y Chin; A Shirazi; P A Fagan
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1999-12

10.  Improved preservation of facial nerve function with use of electrical monitoring during removal of acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  S G Harner; J R Daube; M J Ebersold; C W Beatty
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.