| Literature DB >> 31749888 |
Mustafa B Sayhan1, Serhat Oguz2, Ömer Salt1, Nuray Can3, Taner Ozgurtas4, Tulın D Yalta3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is a serious clinical condition. There were a lot of experimental studies performed in the treatment of I/R injury. To our knowledge, this is the first experimental study with effects of sesamin on I/R injury model. We aimed to investigate the protective effect of sesamin on mesenteric I/R injury model.Entities:
Keywords: mesenteric ischemia reperfusion; oxidant parameters; rat; sesamin
Year: 2018 PMID: 31749888 PMCID: PMC6855156 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2017.68535
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Intestinal tissue damage assessment scale as defined by Chiu et al.
| Level | Microscopic findings |
|---|---|
| 0 | No mucosal changes |
| 1 | Despite Grunhagen changes in subepithelial region, villous structures are preserved and no cellular damage or inflammation |
| 2 | Lysis at cellular level, increase in gap between villous structures, and formation of Grunhagen in subepithelial region |
| 3 | Destruction of free villous structures, dilation at capillary level and inflammation at cellular level |
| 4 | Inflamed cells, necrotic material, bleeding, and ulceration due to near-total destruction of the villous structures |
| 5 | No visible structure other than amorphous material in the submucosal tissue and the entirely destroyed mucous membrane |
Serum TAS, TOS, and OSI levels of the groups, mean ± SD (median)
| Parameter | Group ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | S | I/R | I/R + S | ||
| TAS [mmol/l] | 1.9 ±0.2 (1.88) | 2.3 ±0.3 | 2.1 ±0.4 | 2.8 ±0.3 | 0.001 |
| TOS [mmol/l] | 21.4 ±6.3 (21.5) | 18.2 ±5.1 (18.3) | 96.8 ±28.7 | 25.6 ±6.5 | 0.002 |
| OSI [arbitrary units] | 11.2 ±3.6 (11.2) | 7.9 ±2.8 (7.9) | 46.1 ±15.2 | 9.1 ±3.2 (8.7) | 0.001 |
SD – standard deviation, C – control, S – sesamin, I/R – ischemia/reperfusion, I/R + S – ischemia reperfusion + sesamin, TAS – total antioxidant status, TOS – total oxidative status, OSI – oxidative stress index, P-values indicate the differences between the groups (Kruskal-Wallis test)
I/R < S, I/R + S
S > C
I/R + S > C,S, I/R
I/R > C, S, I/R + S
I/R + S > S
I/R > C, S, I/R + S (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.005).
Tissue TAS, TOS, and OSI levels of the groups, mean ± SD (median)
| Parameter | Group ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | S | I/R | I/R + S | ||
| TAS [mmol/l] | 2.7 ±0.4 (2.8) | 3.6 ±0.2 | 2.9 ±0.3 (2.9) | 3.9 ±0.2 | 0.002 |
| TOS [mmol/l] | 86.8 ±9.7 (87.3) | 26.2 ±9.3 (26.1) | 218.4 ±79.3 | 105.8 ±25.6 | 0.004 |
| OSI [arbitrary units] | 32.1 ±4.2 (32.9) | 7.3 ±3.4 (7.3) | 75.3 ±21.8 | 27.1 ±8.4 (26.9) | 0.003 |
SD – standard deviation, C – control, S – sesamin, I/R – ischemia/reperfusion, I/R + S – ischemia reperfusion + sesamin, TAS – total antioxidant status, TOS – total oxidative status, OSI – oxidative stress index, p-values indicate the differences between the groups (Kruskal-Wallis test)
I/R < S, I/R + S
S > C
I/R + S > C,S, I/R
I/R > C, S, I/R + S
I/R + S > S
I/R > C, S, I/R + S (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.005).
Figure 1Microscopic appearance of Chiu score (intestinal tissue injury score) (H & E, 200×). A – score 0, B – score 1, C – score 2, D – score 3, E – score 4, F – score 5
Intestinal tissue injury scores of groups according to Chiu et al.
| Number of rats | Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | S | I/R | I/R + S | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
C – control, S – sesamin, I/R – ischemia/reperfusion, I/R + S – ischemia reperfusion + sesamin.
Histopathologic evaluation of intestinal tissue for each group (mean ± SD)
| Group (n = 8) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | S | I/R | I/R + S | ||
| 0.00 ±0.00 | 0.00 ±0.00 | 2.75 ±0.25 | 1.38 ±0.18 | 0.001 | |
S – standard deviation, C – control, S – sesamin, I/R – ischemia/reperfusion, I/R + S – ischemia reperfusion + sesamin, p-values indicates the differences between the groups (Kruskal-Wallis test)
I/R > C, S, I/R + S (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.005).