Literature DB >> 3174982

Prostatic carcinoma: staging with MR imaging at 1.5 T.

M Bezzi1, H Y Kressel, K S Allen, M L Schiebler, H G Altman, A J Wein, H M Pollack.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was used to stage prostatic carcinoma in 81 patients with a proved diagnosis. MR imaging findings were correlated with histologic findings regarding the local extent of disease (37 patieNts) and the presence of nodal metastases (51 patients). Tumor nodules were detected in the peripheral zone (PZ) in 34 of 37 patients and were of low signal intensity compared with the signal of the PZ. Hemorrhage in the PZ represented a problem in tumor detection and in tumor volume measurement. When multiple criteria for local tumor spread were combined, MR imaging had a sensitivity of 72%, a specificity of 84%, and an accuracy of 78% in the differentiation of stage A or B from Stage C or D disease. Assessment of seminal vesicle invasion was more accurate than assessment of direct extracapsular spread. In five patients, microscopic invasion of the capsule (stage C) was classified as stage B with MR imaging; from a clinical standpoint, this should not affect patient treatment and prognosis. The MR imaging sensitivity in the detection of lymph node metastases was 69%, with a specificity of 95% and an accuracy of 88%. In this study MR imaging proved reliable in the comprehensive evaluation and staging of prostatic carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3174982     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.169.2.3174982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  21 in total

Review 1.  Methods for volume assessment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Stefan Corvin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging in oncology.

Authors:  J E Husband; R Guy
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Value of the hemorrhage exclusion sign on T1-weighted prostate MR images for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tristan Barrett; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Oguz Akin; Debra A Goldman; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging before and after radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Westphalen; David A McKenna; John Kurhanewicz; Fergus V Coakley
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Local staging of prostate carcinoma with endorectal coil MRI: correlation with whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  C Bartolozzi; I Menchi; R Lencioni; S Serni; A Lapini; G Barbanti; A Bozza; A Amorosi; A Manganelli; M Carini
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Primary staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  G J Jager; J O Barentz; E T Ruijter; J J de la Rosette; G O Oosterhof
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Localised carcinoma of the prostate: a paradigm of uncertainty.

Authors:  S S Sandhu; A V Kaisary
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 8.  Advancements in MR imaging of the prostate: from diagnosis to interventions.

Authors:  David Bonekamp; Michael A Jacobs; Riham El-Khouli; Dan Stoianovici; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 9.  Target detection: magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Sonn; Daniel J Margolis; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 10.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future.

Authors:  John Kurhanewicz; Daniel Vigneron; Peter Carroll; Fergus Coakley
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.309

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.