| Literature DB >> 31749784 |
Benoît Bergk Pinto1, Lorrie Maccario1, Aurélien Dommergue2, Timothy M Vogel1, Catherine Larose1.
Abstract
The effect of nutrients on microbial interactions, including competition and collaboration, has mainly been studied in laboratories, but their potential application to complex ecosystems is unknown. Here, we examined the effect of changes in organic acids among other parameters on snow microbial communities in situ over 2 months. We compared snow bacterial communities from a low organic acid content period to that from a higher organic acid period. We hypothesized that an increase in organic acids would shift the dominant microbial interaction from collaboration to competition. To evaluate microbial interactions, we built taxonomic co-variance networks from OTUs obtained from 16S rRNA gene sequencing. In addition, we tracked marker genes of microbial cooperation (plasmid backbone genes) and competition (antibiotic resistance genes) across both sampling periods in metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. Our results showed a decrease in the average connectivity of the network during late spring compared to the early spring that we interpreted as a decrease of cooperation. This observation was strengthened by the significantly more abundant plasmid backbone genes in the metagenomes from the early spring. The modularity of the network from the late spring was also found to be higher than the one from the early spring, which is another possible indicator of increased competition. Antibiotic resistance genes were significantly more abundant in the late spring metagenomes. In addition, antibiotic resistance genes were also positively correlated to the organic acid concentration of the snow across both seasons. Snow organic acid content might be responsible for this change in bacterial interactions in the Arctic snow community.Entities:
Keywords: competition; cooperation; networks; organic acids; snow
Year: 2019 PMID: 31749784 PMCID: PMC6842950 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02492
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Principal component analysis biplot from the snow chemical analyses of the samples used in this study. The different chemical variables considered in this PCA are represented by vectors. The samples [black dots (early spring samples) and triangles (late spring samples)] are represented based on their respective projections.
Comparison of the different co-inertia calculated with the snow chemistry of the different snow samples and the different datasets such as 16S rRNA sequence clusters and the metagenomes/metatranscriptomes annotations determined with the Eggnog mapper.
| Metagenomes | Genes id | 0.44 | 0.033 |
| GO terms | 0.45 | 0.003 | |
| Kegg pathways | 0.59 | 0.0002 | |
| Metatranscriptomes | Genes id | 0.43 | 0.072 |
| GO terms | 0.44 | 0.023 | |
| Kegg pathways | 0.37 | 0.064 | |
| 16S rRNA sequencing | OTU 97% id | 0.48 | 0.01 |
FIGURE 2Co-variance networks built from the OTU normalized counts from early spring (ES) and late spring (LS). Each dot represents an OTU (the colors represent different phyla) and each black line represents a positive co-variance (considered as a surrogate of cooperation) and the two red lines in the ES networks represent two negative co-variances (interpreted as a possible competitive interaction). The red circles highlight the interactions that both networks shared. The average connectivity (average amount of positive co-variance a node possesses in a network) is higher in the ES network (=4) compared to the LS network (=1.82). The modularity was higher in the LS network (0.72) than in the ES network (0.532).
The main network properties observed in the two co-variance networks build from OTU clusters of 16S rRNA gene sequencing data.
| Average node connectivity | 4 | 1.82 |
| Modularity | 0.532 | 0.72 |
| Graph density (group adhesion) | 0.14 | 0.18 |
| Networks connectivity (group cohesion) | 1 | 0 |
| Transitivity | 0.48 | 1 |
| Average node closeness (normalized) | 0.28 | 0.11 |
| Average edge betweenness | 36.62 | 0 |
FIGURE 3Venn diagrams displaying the functional overlap from the metagenomes (MG) and the metatranscriptomes (MT) from the early spring (ES) and the late spring (LS) periods based on two different levels of annotations (using EGGNOG-mapper) retrieved using UNIPROT: (A) protein name level and (B) GO (gene onthology) categories.
FIGURE 4Volcano plot displaying the protein names significantly enriched in early or late spring metagenomes compared to the other period. The log10 of the p-value significance of the differential abundance study retrieved from edgeR is plotted as a function of the logFold change observed for the respective protein names used in the study (filtered out for occurrences lower than two samples). The cutoff of p-val > 0.05 (log10(0.05) = 1.3) has been used in this study. The plasmid structural protein names (replication proteins and toxin anti-toxin complex, considered as surrogate of bacterial cooperation) identified are plotted as blue dots, the antibiotic resistance/synthesis protein names (surrogate of bacterial competition) are plotted as red dot. We plotted protein names related to viruses in black and protein names related to chemotaxis and sensors as orange dots.
Protein names related to plasmid structure genes determined by edgeR as being significantly enriched in metagenomes from early spring (logFC < 0) or late spring (logFC > 0).
| Replication initiation protein (Protein E) (Protein rep) | −9.193 | 12.645 | 1.62 × 10–15 |
| Rep protein (Fragment) | −7.600 | 11.182 | 1.288 × 10–11 |
| Putative plasmid maintenance system antidote protein, XRE family | −5.240 | 9.607 | 3 × 10–5 |
| XRE family plasmid maintenance system antidote protein | −4.397 | 9.255 | 0.001 |
| Plasmid maintenance system killer | −3.300 | 9.107 | 0.007 |
| Plasmid recombination protein | −2.041 | 10.565 | 0.027 |
| Plasmid recombination protein.1 | −2.041 | 10.565 | 0.027 |
| Replication protein | 3.517 | 11.551 | 0.0005 |
Protein names related to antibiotic resistance or synthesis genes returned by edgeR as being significantly enriched in metagenomes from early spring (logFC < 0) or late spring (logFC > 0).
| Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (EC 2.3.1.28) | −11.509 | 14.915 | 5.50 × 10–21 |
| Transcriptional regulator, TetR family | 1.922 | 11.399 | 2.2 × 10–2 |
| Beta-lactamase | 2.168 | 10.564 | 2.4 × 10–2 |
| Penicillin-binding protein 1B (PBP-1b) (PBP1b) (Murein polymerase) | 2.471 | 9.616 | 0.036 |
| Penicillin-binding protein 2 | 3.301 | 9.189 | 0.043 |
| Glyoxalase/bleomycin resistance protein/dioxygenase | 3.393 | 9.801 | 0.011 |
| Macrolide export ATP-binding/permease protein MacB (EC 3.6.3.-) | 3.807 | 9.312 | 0.017 |
| Penicillin-binding protein | 3.873 | 9.338 | 0.017 |
| Putative amidase | 6.663 | 10.997 | 3.15e – 06 |
FIGURE 5Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGD) transcription annotated from the metatranscriptome datasets (MT) vs. the total sum of organic acids amounts measured in the snow samples (black dot, early spring samples and black triangle, late spring samples). The numbers display the amount of different ARGD genes annotated in each sample. A Spearman correlation between ARGD transcription and total organic acids concentration had a rho = 0.57 and a p-value = 0.010.