| Literature DB >> 31749776 |
Soraya Mezouar1,2, Imene Benammar1,2, Asma Boumaza1,2, Aïssatou Bailo Diallo1,2, Céline Chartier1,2, Christophe Buffat3, John Boudjarane4, Philippe Halfon5, Maria Katsogiannou6, Jean-Louis Mege1,2,7.
Abstract
The intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii is responsible for Q fever, an infectious disease that increases the risk of abortion, preterm labor, and stillbirth in pregnant women. It has been shown that C. burnetii replicates in BeWo trophoblast cell line and inhibits the activation and maturation of decidual dendritic cells. Although tissue macrophages are known to be targeted by C. burnetii, no studies have investigated the interplay between placental macrophages and C. burnetii. Here, CD14+ macrophages from 46 full-term placentas were isolated by positive selection. They consisted of a mixed population of maternal and fetal origin as shown by genotype analysis. We showed that C. burnetii organisms infected placental macrophages after 4 h. When these infected macrophages were incubated for an additional 9-day culture, they completely eliminated organisms as shown by quantitative PCR. The ability of placental macrophages to form multinucleated giant cells was not affected by C. burnetii infection. The transcriptional immune response of placental macrophages to C. burnetii was investigated using quantitative real-time RT-PCR on 8 inflammatory and 10 immunoregulatory genes. C. burnetii clearly induced an inflammatory profile. Interestingly, the production by placental macrophages of interferon-γ, a cytokine known to be involved in efficient immune responses, was dramatically increased in response to C. burnetii. In addition, a clear correlation between interferon-γ production and C. burnetii elimination was found, suggesting that macrophages from full-term placentas eliminate C. burnetii under the control of an autocrine production of interferon-γ.Entities:
Keywords: Coxiella burnetii; inflammation; interferon-γ; macrophages; multinuclear giant cells; placenta
Year: 2019 PMID: 31749776 PMCID: PMC6842979 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
List of genes associated with macrophage polarization.
| Gene symbol | Forward primer (5′-3′) | Reverse primer (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|
| β-actin | GGAAATCGTGCGTGACATTA | AGGAGGAAGGCTGGAAGAG |
| GCTGGAGAGCTACAAGAGGATCA | TCTCTCTTGAGCTTGGTGACAAAA | |
| TTGCAAGCTGATGGTCAAGATC | CAACCCGAGCTCCTGGAA | |
| CCTCCATCCCCCATACTAAATC | GTCTCCAAAAATCAAGGACAGG | |
| GCTCGGGGAAAACAAACC | TTCTTCTGGCATTGGGTGA | |
| TCATCTCACAGACCACAAGTCA | CAAAATAGGAGGCAGTTCCAGT | |
| GAAAATAATCCCCACACGCTAC | GTCACTCTCTCCACCCTCACA | |
| ATCTTCCGTCCCTCATCCTAAC | CTCAGCATCTCTCCCACCTTT | |
| ACACTTGCGGATATTCTGGACT | GGGAGATGGTGTGTAATTGAT | |
| GTTGAAGAGGAAGGGCAAAAC | ACTGGGAAGTTGGAATGAGATG | |
| CATCTATCTGGGAGGGGTCTTC | AGGAGGGGGTAATAAAGGGATT | |
| AACTTCCACCAGGCTTCTCTC | GGGGGCTGAAATAACCAAAG | |
| GAGCAGAGAGGCAAAGAAACA | ATGTGAAGCAGCAAGTAGATGG | |
| CATCTCCTACACCCCACGAA | CATTCTCACGCAAACCTGAACT | |
| GGCATTTCTGGTAGAGTTCACA | ATACTTTCTGAGTGGGCAGGA | |
| AGAACTGTGGCTGGAAAATGAG | GTGGTTGTCGTTGTGTGTGAG | |
| GAGGTTGTGTCTTGTAGCCAGT | CCCCTTTTTGTAGTGGAGGAAG | |
| ACACCTGGAGCAAGAAGGATAA | CCACAGAGTAGACCACACCACT | |
| ACTTGGAGGTGGTATGTGCTG | CTCAGGGCTTGCTTCTTGTAGT | |
| CCCTCAAAACAGTCCTCCTTCT | TTTCCTCATTCTTCTGCTCCTC | |
| GGATACAAGAGCTTAGCAGGGTG | GCGTGAAGGAGAGGAGTTGC | |
Figure 1Characterization of placental macrophages. (A) Placental CD14+ cells from 20 different placentas were analyzed for the expression of CD14 and CD68 by flow cytometry. Representative dot-blots are shown. (B) Placental macrophages from the placentas of male fetuses were analyzed for the expression of X, Y, and 18 chromosomes. Representative pictures show the X chromosome (in green), the Y chromosome (in red), and the chromosome 18 (nucleus in blue, used as control).
Figure 2Microbicidal activity of placental macrophages. Placental CD14+ macrophages (2 × 106 cells per assay) were infected or not by C. burnetii (bacterium-to-cell ratio of 50:1) for 4 h. (A) Confocal pictures show placental macrophage infected of not by DID-labeled bacteria. Infected macrophages were illustrated by the sections at the top and the right of the image was bacteria indicated in red, F-actin labeled with phalloidin-488 in green, and nucleus stained with Hoechst 3342 in blue. (B) Placental macrophages were incubated with C. burnetii for 4 h (day 0), then washed to eliminate free bacteria and incubated for 9 days. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) quantification was performed at each time of kinetic time of infection (n = 4 placentas). (C) Pictures of placental macrophages infected by C. burnetii at 0-, 3-, 6- and 9-day post-infection. Bacteria are indicated in red, F-actin labeled with phalloidin-488 in green and nucleus stained with Hoechst 3342 in blue. (D) Every 3 days, the number of bacterial DNA copies was evaluated by qPCR (n = 14 placentas). **p ≤ 0.01 and ***p ≤ 0.001. (E) Percentage of live/dead bacteria number was evaluated per macrophages at each time (ns = not significant).
Figure 3MGC formation and C. burnetii infection. Isolated placental macrophages (2 × 105 cells per assay) from eight different placentas were stimulated by C. burnetii (bacterium-to-cell ratio of 50:1) for 4 h, then washed to eliminate unbound bacteria and cultivated for 9 days. (A) The time course of the number of MGCs was determined by optical determination and the results expressed in percentage of cells presenting at least two nuclei. (B) A representative confocal picture is shown after 3 days with F-actin labeled with phalloidin-488 in green, nucleus stained with Hoechst 3342 in blue, and bacteria in red. Intracellular bacteria were observed in the sections found at the top and the right of the image. (C) The analyses of MGC formation and C. burnetii survival performed using four placentas are correlated (R2 = −0.88, p = 0.043).
Figure 4Polarization profile of placental macrophages stimulated by C. burnetii. Placental macrophages (1 × 106 cells per assay) were incubated with C. burnetii (bacterium-to-cell ratio of 50:1) or 1 μg/ml LPS for 6 h, and their M1/M2 transcriptional response was analyzed by qRT-PCR. (A) A principal component analysis showed the repartition of unstimulated placental macrophages (in green, six placentas), C. burnetii-stimulated (in red, seven placentas), and LPS-stimulated macrophages (in blue, seven placentas) according to the expression of M1 genes (left panel) and M2 genes (right panel). (B) A heat-map analysis showed the modulation of the relative quantity expression of M1 genes (in red) and M2 genes (in blue) when placental macrophages were unstimulated or stimulated by C. burnetii or LPS.
Figure 5IFN-γ release and C. burnetii infection. (A and B) Placental macrophages (1 × 106 cells per assay) were incubated or not with C. burnetii (bacterium-to-cell ratio of 50:1) or 1 μg/ml LPS for 4 h (day 0) and then washed to eliminate free bacteria. The release of IFN-γ was quantified at 0-, 3-, 6-, and 9-day post-infection or unstimulated cells as control when six placentas were used. (C) The release of IFN-γ by placental macrophages was correlated with C. burnetii survival (R2 = −1, p = 0.0417) when four placentas were used. *p ≤ 0.05 and **p ≤ 0.01.