Literature DB >> 31749662

Reaching Youth With Sexually Transmitted Disease Testing: Building on Successes, Challenges, and Lessons Learned From Local Get Yourself Tested Campaigns.

Allison L Friedman1, Allison Bozniak2, Jessie Ford3, Ashley Hill2, Kristina Olson2, Rebecca Ledsky2, Derek Inokuchi2, Kathryn Brookmeyer1.   

Abstract

Nine programs were funded across eight states in the United States to customize, implement, and evaluate local campaigns in support of the national Get Yourself Tested (GYT) campaign. Each program promoted chlamydia screening and treatment/referral to sexually active young women (aged 15-25 years) and their partners through accessible, free, or low-cost services. This article documents the strategies and outcomes of these local GYT campaigns, highlighting the diversity in which a national sexual health campaign is implemented at the local level and identifying challenges and successes. Nearly all (n = 7) programs involved target audience members in campaign development/implementation. Youth were linked to free or low-cost sexually transmitted disease testing through community centers, high schools and colleges, community and clinic events; online or text-based ordering of test kits; and community pickup locations. Sites used a combination of traditional and new media, on-the-ground activities, promotional products, and educational and social events to promote testing. With the exception of one site, all sites reported increases in the number of persons tested for chlamydia during campaign implementation, compared to baseline. Increases ranged from 0.5% to 128%. Successes included development of local partnerships, infrastructure, and capacity; use of peer leaders and involvement; and opportunities to explore new innovations. Challenges included use of social media/new technologies, timing constraints, limited organizational and evaluation capacity, and unforeseen delays/setbacks. Each of these issues is explored, along with lessons learned, with intent to inform future sexual health promotion efforts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  STD testing; STD/HIV; local adaptations; sexual health promotion; youth

Year:  2014        PMID: 31749662      PMCID: PMC6866650          DOI: 10.1177/1524500414530386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Mar Q        ISSN: 1524-5004


  18 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of the effect of mediated health communication campaigns on behavior change in the United States.

Authors:  Leslie B Snyder; Mark A Hamilton; Elizabeth W Mitchell; James Kiwanuka-Tondo; Fran Fleming-Milici; Dwayne Proctor
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004

Review 2.  The simplest statistical test: how to check for a difference between treatments.

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-27

Review 3.  Mass media interventions for promoting HIV testing: Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  J Vidanapathirana; M J Abramson; A Forbes; C Fairley
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 4.  A 10-year systematic review of HIV/AIDS mass communication campaigns: Have we made progress?

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Philip Palmgreen; Melissa Chabot; Nicole Dobransky; Rick S Zimmerman
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb

Review 5.  Unveiling the hidden epidemic: a review of stigma associated with sexually transmissible infections.

Authors:  Julia E Hood; Allison L Friedman
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.706

6.  Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  I M Rosenstock; V J Strecher; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1988

7.  An assessment of the GYT: Get Yourself Tested campaign: an integrated approach to sexually transmitted disease prevention communication.

Authors:  Allison L Friedman; Kathryn A Brookmeyer; Rachel E Kachur; Jessie Ford; Matthew Hogben; Melissa A Habel; Leslie M Kantor; Elizabeth Clark; Jamie Sabatini; Mary McFarlane
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  The intersection of youth, technology, and new media with sexual health: moving the research agenda forward.

Authors:  Susannah Allison; Jose A Bauermeister; Sheana Bull; Marguerita Lightfoot; Brian Mustanski; Ross Shegog; Deb Levine
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.012

9.  Gonorrhea and chlamydia in the United States among persons 14 to 39 years of age, 1999 to 2002.

Authors:  S Deblina Datta; Maya Sternberg; Robert E Johnson; Stuart Berman; John R Papp; Geraldine McQuillan; Hillard Weinstock
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Natasha L Pavlin; Jane M Gunn; Rhian Parker; Christopher K Fairley; Jane Hocking
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  1 in total

1.  What is the effectiveness of community-based health promotion campaigns on chlamydia screening uptake in young people and what barriers and facilitators have been identified? A mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Emma Pearce; Kate Jolly; Isobel Marion Harris; Ada Adriano; David Moore; Malcolm Price; Jonathan Ross
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.519

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.