| Literature DB >> 31749580 |
Johanes Nugroho1,2, Wiwik Misaco Yuniarti3, Ardyan Wardhana4, Cornelia Ghea4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Several difficulties are involved in creating models for myocardial infarction (MI) in animals, such as low survival rates after acute MI, complicated techniques in creating animal models, complexities in confirming acute MI incidence, and complex surgical tools needed in the process. This study aimed to develop an animal model for acute MI using Wistar rats utilizing simple instruments that are readily available in standard animal laboratories.Entities:
Keywords: left anterior descending coronary artery ligation; myocardial infarction; rat model
Year: 2019 PMID: 31749580 PMCID: PMC6813610 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.1448-1453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Figure-1Intubation process: (a) Direct laryngoscopy was performed using a neonatal laryngoscope. A wire was inserted inside a 14-gauge intravenous catheter. (b) Insertion of the intravenous catheter with the help of an assistant to place the head into the “floating” position. (c) The wire was then detached from the intravenous catheter after ensuring that the intravenous catheter had entered the lumen of the trachea. (d) Once the intravenous catheter was inside the lumen of the trachea, the intravenous catheter was connected to a three-way stopcock and an oxygen cannula attached to an oxygen tank.
Figure-2Coronary artery ligation and extraction of the heart: (a) exposing the heart during coronary artery ligation procedure; (b) closing the surgical area after artery ligation; (c) heart extraction for sacrifice procedure; (d) the extracted heart showing the ligation 1-2 mm distal of the left atrial appendage.
Figure-3Myocardial infarction size measurement of groups (a) I, (b) II, (c) III, and (d) IV (hematoxylin and eosin stain, 40× magnification).
Figure-4Macroscopic measurement of the infarcted area using graphic software.
Mean weight of the subjects.
| Group | n | Weight (g) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | 6 | 237.5±25.05 | 0.60 |
| II | 6 | 231.67±16.33 | |
| III | 6 | 242.50±19.43 | |
| IV | 6 | 245.67±10.89 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation
SGOT and CKMB levels.
| Group | n | SGOT | CKMB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±SD | p-value | Mean±SD | p-value | ||
| Ligation | 18 | 435.22±168.56 | <0.01 | 2476.54±957.21 | 0.09 |
| Sham | 6 | 162.84±39.12 | 1589.53±729.91 | ||
CKMB=Creatine kinase isoenzyme muscle–brain, SD=Standard deviation, SGOT=Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase
Infarcted area of the ligation groups.
| Group | Infarct size (%) | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| I | 35.0±5.7 | <0.01[ |
| II | 56.5±2.5 | <0.01[ |
| III | 44.3±2.9 | |
| IV | 0±0 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
Differences among Groups I, II, and III,
Differences between Groups II and III