| Literature DB >> 31749470 |
Elżbieta Radziejewska-Kubzdela1, Anna Olejnik2, Róża Biegańska-Marecik1.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to determine the effect of pretreatment with hot water or steaming on glucosinolates, polyphenols contents and antioxidant capacity in obtained raw juices. Moreover, in vitro cytotoxic activity of the raw juice to the cells derived from the gastrointestinal tract, including the small intestine (IEC-6 cell line), colon (Caco-2 cell line) and the liver (HepG2 cell line) were also investigated. The dominant glucosinolates in the wild rocket leaves were glucoraphanin (36%) and dimeric 4-mercaptobutyl (30%), followed by glucosativin and glucoerucin, 11% per each. Glucothiobeinin (6%), glucobrassicin (1%), 4-methoxyglucobrassicin (1%) and two unidentified compounds (4%) were also detected in rocket leaves. In terms of phenolic compounds, quercetin constituted the majority (55%) and the rest composed of hydroxycinnamic acids. In raw juices produced from steamed, pretreatment with hot water and untreated (control) leaves, glucosinolate contents were lower about 21%, 37% and 53%, respectively, than their levels in the raw material. The highest content of polyphenols among the juices tested (45.4 mg/100 g fresh weight) and antioxidant capacity (5.8 µmol Trolox/1 g f.w.) was recorded in the raw juice from pretreated leaves with hot water. The wild rocket raw juice concentrations responsible for a 50% reduction in Caco-2 and HepG2 cell viability were estimated at 1.87 ± 0.08 mg/mL and 3.54 ± 0.29 mg/mL. The viability of the IEC-6 cells was reduced by only 19.04%, at the maximum concentration (3.6 mg/mL) of the raw juice.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant capacity; Glucosinolates; Polyphenols; Wild rocket
Year: 2019 PMID: 31749470 PMCID: PMC6838275 DOI: 10.1007/s13197-019-03992-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Sci Technol ISSN: 0022-1155 Impact factor: 2.701
Glucosinolate profile (mg/100 g f.w.) in mash and obtained juices from wild rocket salad (n = 9, mean ± standard deviation)
| Sample | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| raw material | 75b ± 2 | 12.1a ± 0.1 | 23.9b ± 1.4 | 22.8ab ± 1.5 | 5.2c ± 0.2 | 1.29ab ± 0.03 | 63a ± 4 | 1.23ab ± 0.04 | nd | 5.2c ± 0.3 | 210d ± 7 |
| M (control) | 73b ± 5 | 10.0b ± 1.1 | 22.9b ± 3.2 | 22.9b ± 0.1 | 1.3ab ± 0.1 | 0.87a ± 0.07 | 60a ± 2 | 1.06a ± 0.12 | nd | 7.2d ± 0.5 | 199cd ± 13 |
| MHW | 64a ± 2 | 5.8c ± 0.6 | 9.9d ± 0.9 | 24.0abc ± 1.7 | 1.2a ± 0.3 | 2.20c ± 0.10 | 75d ± 1 | 1.91e ± 0.17 | nd | 3.8b ± 0.7 | 188bc ± 7 |
| MSB | 49e ± 4 | 1.5d ± 0.2 | 5.6a ± 0.7 | 16.0cd ± 3.0 | 1.0d ± 0.2 | 1.27ab ± 0.08 | 60a ± 4 | 1.15ab ± 0.15 | 1.19 ± 0.32 | 1.6a ± 0.2 | 138ab ± 14 |
| Juice from M | 31c ± 3 | 15.2e ± 1.2 | nd c | 12.5d ± 2.8 | nd e | 2.86d ± 0.08 | 36b ± 3 | 0.88d ± 0.07 | nd | nd | 98e ± 9 |
| Juice from MHW | 43d ± 3 | 7.3f ± 0.1 | 6.0a ± 0.8 | 18.5ac ± 3.6 | 1.6b ± 0.0 | 1.17ab ± 0.08 | 51c ± 3 | 1.31bc ± 0.09 | nd | 1.4a ± 0.2 | 131a ± 9 |
| Juice from MSB | 63a ± 1 | 3.6g ± 0.2 | 6.5a ± 1.7 | 22.7ab ± 1.3 | 1.3ab ± 0.0 | 1.61b ± 0.15 | 63a ± 1 | 1.38c ± 0.06 | nd | 3.3b ± 0.1 | 166b ± 4 |
A—glucoraphanin, B-glucothiobeinin, C-glucosativin, D-glucoerucin, E-unknown, F-glucobrassicin, G-7-dimeric 4-mercaptobutyl-GLS, H-4-metoxyglucobrassicin, I-gluconasturtiin, J-unknown
M mash from leaves without additional pre-treatment, MHW mash from leaves after heated treatment in water, MSB mash from leaves after steam blanching
Means within columns marked by the same letter do not differ significantly at P < 0.05, nd—not detected
Phenol compounds content (mg/100 g f.w.) in the mash and the juices from wild rocket leaves (n = 9, mean ± standard deviation)
| Sample | Hydroxycinamic acids | Derivatives quercetin | Total of phenolic compounds content |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw material | 38.5e ± 4.9e | 47.8f ± 1.3 | 86.3b ± 3.6 |
| M (control) | 35.8e ± 0.8e | 47.2f ± 0.2 | 83.0b ± 1.0 |
| MHW | 31.1c ± 0.7c | 52.0g ± 2.3g | 83.1b ± 3.0 |
| MSB | 19.7d ± 0.8 | 38.0d ± 0.4 | 57.7d ± 0.5 |
| Juice from M | 12.3a ± 0.1a | 21.3a ± 0.7a | 33.6a ± 0.8 |
| Juice from MHW | 16.1b ± 1.9 | 29.3c ± 0.9c | 45.4c ± 2.9 |
| Juice from MSB | 13.2ab ± 0.2a | 24.b 1 ± 0.2 | 37.3a ± 0.2 |
M mash from leaves without additional pre-treatment, MHW mash from leaves after heated treatment in water, MSB mash from leaves after steam blanching
Means within columns marked by the same letter do not differ significantly at P < 0.05
Antioxidant capacity (μmol Trolox/1 g f.w.) in the mash and the juices from wild rocket leaves (n = 9, mean ± standard deviation)
| Sample | ABTS |
|---|---|
| Raw material | 9.1de ± 0.3 |
| M | 10.4e ± 0.7 |
| MHW | 7.6cd ± 1.5 |
| MSB | 6.7bc ± 1.4 |
| Juice from M | 3.3a ± 0.1 |
| Juice from MHW | 5.8b ± 0.0 |
| Juice from MSB | 3.9a ± 0.3 |
M mash from leaves without additional pre-treatment, MHW mash from leaves after heated treatment in water, MSB mash from leaves after steam blanching
Means within columns marked by the same letter do not differ significantly at P < 0.05
Fig. 1The effect of wild rocket juice on the cell viability and metabolic activity measured using the MTT test. Statistically significant differences *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 versus control group
Cytotoxic doses of wild racket juice determined in IEC-6, Caco-2 and HepG2 cell cultures (n = 3, mean ± standard deviation)
| Cytotoxic dose | IEC-6 cells | Caco-2 cells | HepG2 cells |
|---|---|---|---|
| EC10 (mg/mL) | 0.66 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0.02 |
| EC50 (mg/mL) | > 3.60/nd | 1.87 ± 0.08 | 3.54 ± 0.29 |
nd—non-detected in the concentration range from 0.03 to 3.60 mg/mL