| Literature DB >> 31747966 |
Dong-Mei Xie1,2, Yuan-Long Li3, Jie Li1,2, Qinglang Li1,2, Guihua Lu2, Yuansheng Zhai1,2, Juhong Zhang1,2, Zhibin Huang4, Xiuren Gao5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Experimental and clinical trials have demonstrated the efficiency of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (bMSCs) in the treatment of myocardial infarction. However, after intravenous injection, the ineffective migration of engrafted bMSCs to the hearts remains an obstacle, which has an undesirable impact on the efficiency of cell-based therapy. Therefore, we attempted to identify a marker that could distinguish a subpopulation of bMSCs with a promising migratory capacity.Entities:
Keywords: CD51; Inflammation; Mesenchymal stem cell; Migration; Myocardial infarction
Year: 2019 PMID: 31747966 PMCID: PMC6865070 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-019-1439-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther ISSN: 1757-6512 Impact factor: 6.832
Primers used for the PCR analysis
| Genes | Forward sequence | Reverse sequence |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3′ | 5′-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3′ |
| PPAR-γ | 5′-GTACTGTCGGTTTCAGAAGTGCC-3′ | 5′-ATCTCCGCCAACAGCTTCTCCT-3′ |
| Adipsin | 5′-ACCTGACAGCCTTGAGGACGAC-3′ | 5′-GGGTTCCACTTCTTTGTCCTCG-3′ |
| Leptin | 5′-GCAGTGCCTATCCAGAAAGTCC-3′ | 5′-GGAATGAAGTCCAAGCCAGTGAC-3′ |
| Osteopontin | 5′-GCTTGGCTTATGGACTGAGGTC-3′ | 5′-CCTTAGACTCACCGCTCTTCATG-3′ |
| Osteocalcin | 5′-GCAATAAGGTAGTGAACAGACTCC-3′ | 5′-CCATAGATGCGTTTGTAGGCGG-3′ |
| PTHR | 5′-TGAAGGACGCTGTGCTCTACTC-3′ | 5′-AGTAGAGGAAGAAGGTCACGGC-3′ |
| Collagen II | 5′-GCTGGTGAAGAAGGCAAACGAG-3′ | 5′-CCATCTTGACCTGGGAATCCAC-3′ |
| Collagen X | 5′-GTACCAAACGCCCACAGGCATA-3′ | 5′-GGACCAGGAATGCCTTGTTCTC-3′ |
| Aggrecan | 5′-CAGGCTATGAGCAGTGTGATGC-3′ | 5′-GCTGCTGTCTTTGTCACCCACA-3′ |
| CCR1 | 5′-GCCAAAAGACTGCTGTAAGAGCC-3′ | 5′-GCTTTGAAGCCTCCTATGCTGC − 3′ |
| CCR 2 | 5′-CAAGTAGAGGCAGGATCAGGCT-3′ | 5′-GCTGTGTTTGCCTCTCTACCAG-3′ |
| CCR3 | 5′-CCACTGTACTCCCTGGTGTTCA-3′ | 5′-GGACAGTGAAGAGAAAGAGCAGG-3′ |
| CCR4 | 5′-GGACTAGGTCTGTGCAAGATCG-3′ | 5′-TGCCTTCAAGGAGAATACCGCG-3′ |
| CCR5 | 5′-CCAAGAGTCTCTGTTGCCTGCA-3′ | 5′-GTCTACTTTCTCTTCTGGACTCC-3′ |
| CCR6 | 5′-CTGGTGTAGGCGAGGACTTTCT-3′ | 5′-ACAGAGCCATCCGAGTCGTGAT-3′ |
| CCR7 | 5′-AGAGGCTCAAGACCATGACGGA-3′ | 5′-TCCAGGACTTGGCTTCGCTGTA-3′ |
| CCR8 | 5′-CTGCGATGTGTAAGGTGGTCTC-3′ | 5′-CCTCACCTTGATGGCATAGACAG-3′ |
| CCR9 | 5′-GCCATGTTCATCTCCAACTGCAC-3′ | 5′-CCTTCGGAATCTCTCGCCAACA-3′ |
| CCR10 | 5′-TCACAGTCTGCGTGAGGCTTTC-3′ | 5′-CAGTCTTCGTGTGGCTGTTGTC-3′ |
| CXCR1 | 5′-CCATTCCGTTCTGGTACAGTCTG-3′ | 5′-GTAGCAGACCAGCATAGTGAGC-3′ |
| CXCR2 | 5′-CTCTATTCTGCCAGATGCTGTCC-3′ | 5′-ACAAGGCTCAGCAGAGTCACCA-3′ |
| CXCR3 | 5′-TACGATCAGCGCCTCAATGCCA-3′ | 5′-AGCAGGAAACCAGCCACTAGCT-3′ |
| CXCR4 | 5′-GACTGGCATAGTCGGCAATGGA-3′ | 5′-CAAAGAGGAGGTCAGCCACTGA-3′ |
| CXCR5 | 5′-ATCGTCCATGCTGTTCACGCCT-3′ | 5′-CAACCTTGGCAAAGAGGAGTTCC-3′ |
| CXCR 6 | 5′-GCAGGAACACAGCCACTACAAG-3′ | 5′-GGTTCTTCCTGCCATTGCTCAC-3′ |
| IL6 | 5′-TACCACTTCACAAGTCGGAGGC-3′ | 5′-CTGCAAGTGCATCATCGTTGTTC-3′ |
Fig. 1Isolation and culture of CD51−bMSCs and CD51+bMSCs. a CD51−bMSCs and CD51+bMSCs were isolated using flow cytometry, and the contaminated cells were excluded by the markers CD45, Ter119 and CD31. b The isolated cells were cultured in the medium, and images were obtained at 12 h and 7 days. c Images of the cells at passage 6 were obtained at 0 h and 72 h after adherence. d Proliferation curves based on the cell numbers from 0 to 72 h. e Cells were stained with 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) at 24 h. f Comparison of EdU-positive cell ratios (n = 3). ***P < 0.001. Scale bars are marked in the figure
Fig. 2Differentiation of CD51−bMSCs and CD51+bMSCs. a Adipogenic differentiation; cells were stained with oil red O after 14 days of culture. b Osteogenic differentiation; cells were stained with Alizarin Red after 14 days of culture. c Chondrogenic differentiation; sections of cell balls were stained with toluidine blue after 21 days of culture. d Relative mRNA expression of the indicated clusters (adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic); the gene expression levels were normalized to GAPDH (n = 3). e Representative image of CD105 expression of CD51−bMSC and CD51+bMSC was determined by flow cytometry. Red histogram is the negative control. The left side of the blue histogram (in the negative control part) represents the negative expression of CD105 marker; the right side represents the positive expression of CD105 marker. Data in all panels are presented as the mean ± SD, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Scale bars are marked in the figure
Fig. 3Comparison of cell-based therapeutic efficiency mice with MI. a Representative M-mode echocardiographic images of sham-operated, saline-treated, CD51−bMSC-treated and CD51+bMSC-treated mice. b Heart function analysis; quantification of LVEF, LVFS, LVESV and LVEDV (n = 3 or 4). c Triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining of the heart sections (short axis) at 21 days after treatment. d The proportion of the infarct myocardium area was calculated as the percentage of the left ventricular area (the total area of the five heart sections were used for quantification, n = 3). e Masson’s trichrome staining of the heart sections (long axis) at 21 days after treatment. Data in all panels are presented as the mean ± SD, ns P > 0.05, *P < 0.05. LVEF, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction; LVFS, LV fractional shortening; LVESV, LV end-systolic volume; LVEDV, LV end-diastolic volume
Fig. 4Cell labelling with green fluorescent protein (GFP) and tracing in vivo. a Lentivirus-infected cells purified by GFP expression using flow cytometry and cultured in the medium. b, c Measurement of transplanted GFP-positive cells in the whole hearts at 48 h and 8 days after engraftment (n = 3). Data in all panels are presented as the mean ± SD, **P < 0.01. Scale bars are marked in the figure
Fig. 5Migratory capacity of CD51−bMSCs and CD51+bMSCs in vitro. a, b Images of scratch-wound cell migration assays at 0 h and 24 h; the relative repair area was determined by the total area of migrated cells in the wounds (n = 6). c, d Transwell assay; the migratory cells were fixed at 8 h after plating and stained with crystal violet. Bright-field colour images and fluorescence images were randomly taken, and the cell numbers were calculated (n = 8). e, f Relative mRNA expression of the chemokine receptors; the gene expression levels were normalized to GAPDH (n = 3). Data in all panels are presented as the mean ± SD, **P < 0.01, **P < 0.001. Scale bars are marked in the figure
Fig. 6Characteristics of CD51+bMSCs in vivo. The hearts were collected for immunofluorescence staining 10 days after transplantation. a–d The heart sections stained with the listed antibodies Ki67, CD31, α-SMA and α-actinin (red). 4′,6′-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, blue) was used to stain the nuclei. GFP-positive CD51+bMSCs are green. Scale bars are marked in the figure
Fig. 7CD51+bMSC therapy attenuated inflammatory responses in the hearts after MI. a Immunofluorescence staining of IL-1β (red) in the border areas of the heart sections from the CD51−bMSC- and CD51+bMSC-treated mice at day 3 after MI. DAPI was used to stain the nuclei. Scale bars are marked in the figure. b Quantification of IL-1β-positive cells is presented as the percentage per high power field (Hpf) (n = 5). c Representative images of IL-1β expression was determined by flow cytometry in the hearts from cell-treated mice on day 3 after MI. Red histogram is the negative control. The left side of the green histogram (in the negative control part) represents the negative expression of IL-1β marker; the right side represents the positive expression of IL-1β marker. d Measurement of IL-1β-positive cells is presented as the percentage of the total cells in the injured ventricle on day 3 after MI (n = 3). Data in all panels are presented as the mean ± SD, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01