Literature DB >> 31747675

EEMCO Guidance for the in vivo Assessment of Biomechanical Properties of the Human Skin and Its Annexes: Revisiting Instrumentation and Test Modes.

Luis Monteiro Rodrigues1, Joachim W Fluhr2.   

Abstract

Biomechanics of the skin is an important subject in skin research. It has been studied for many decades involving various technologies and methods to characterize and quantify mechanical properties of the skin under different in vivo conditions. The present EEMCO paper reviews the current rel-evant information, providing practical orientation to researchers dedicated to in vivo assessment of biomechanics of skin and its annexes. We discuss the available non-invasive instruments, including their principles and variables. A correspondence between the descriptors nomenclature proposed by Agache and the designation for the suction-based standard instruments is proposed. The addressed properties include skin softness/stiffness, firmness, elasticity, elastic and viscoelastic properties, extensibility, resilience, anisotropy, acoustical shock wave hardness, friction (in relation to topographic properties), thickness, fiber/stress mechanics (bending, cyclic, tensile, fatigue, or torsion), and hardness. We provide the relation of these properties to biomechanical descriptors and in some cases to SI units. Practical guidance for the proper use of these instruments, limitations, and possible interpretations are provided, while discussing the meaning of descriptive or "phenomenological" variables. For studies intended to quantify the effect of an intervention with regard to mechanical properties, we recommend a minimum of 30-40 participants, based on normal distribution of the data sets. Some important limitations are recognized, including the lack of standardization of procedures and calibration of instruments, which compromises the relevance and real nature of the descriptors/parameters obtained with these devices. The present work highlights an approach to a better practice and a science-supported biomechanical assessment of human skin, hair, and nails.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anisotropy; Cosmetics efficacy; Elasticity; Hair; Instrumental measurements; Mechanical properties; Nails; Skin; Testing methods; Testing modes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31747675     DOI: 10.1159/000504063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Physiol        ISSN: 1660-5527            Impact factor:   3.479


  3 in total

1.  Longitudinal monitoring and prediction of long-term outcome of scar stiffness on pediatric patients.

Authors:  Bettina Müller; Edoardo Mazza; Clemens Schiestl; Julia Elrod
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-09-30

2.  Towards the Development of a Device for Assessing the Pliability of Burn Scars.

Authors:  Francesco Dalle Mura; Lapo Governi; Rocco Furferi; Marta Cervo; Luca Puggelli
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  Interrelationships between Skin Structure, Function, and Microbiome of Pregnant Females and Their Newborns: Study Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Doris Wilborn; Jan Kottner; Kathrin Hillmann; Sa Xu; Frank Konietschke; Ulrike Blume-Peytavi
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2021-11-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.